Posted on 05/23/2016 2:58:54 PM PDT by detective
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has received more than $21 million in just two years for giving speeches to large banks and corporations, and that could be the key factor in her potential political plunge, according to talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh.
I think this is shocking, Limbaugh declared on his Monday broadcast, citing a New York Post report on Sunday documenting the massive amount of money the former secretary of state raked in.
Im telling you, folks: $21 million over two years for 20 or 25 minutes? Theres nothing that screeches out of touch more than that, he said.
I dont think youre gonna see this story in the New York Times or the Washington Post. I dont think any of the nightly newscasts are gonna make a big deal of it. Its gonna be the kind of thing that, if she loses, in their postmortems theyre gonna go back to and say, You know what? We missed this when this happened, but the exit polling will show it, that people thought she was inexorably tied to corporate America.'
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Trump wasn’t my top choice in the primaries, but I look forward to supporting him in the general - despite the fact that so many of his fans on this board appear to have little more than contempt for those who don’t find him to be the new promised one.
And so far as Rush is concerned, he’s been a major force, if not the major source in advancing conservatism over the past three decades, bringing more people into the fold while a certain other individual was trying to decide how big a check to cut for the likes of Charlie Rangel, Chuckie Schemer, Harry Reid, and Teddy Kennedy. But I don’t expect the level of perfection that some in this forum apparently do - I’m happy to back Trump despite some of his poor choices in the past.
Dude, you know what a neocon is, don't you? A neocon is a Democrat who left the party because the left is too antiwar.
So it's not like he's hiding who he is.
excellent point
hardly anyone really wants to hear Shrillary speak, free or paid
the payments are for influence and back-scratching, not for the (non existent) quality of her discourse
I am of the understanding that Levin’s fiancee’s son worked on Cruz’ campaign.
The reason I left out Savage is because as recently as last Friday’s show he was complaining and criticizing Trump for catering too much to the establishment, citing some of his recent campaign operatives. He ranted about Trump moving too much toward the middle.
I acknowledge he has been a key Trump advocate, although there have been a few bumps in the road.
Hopefully, his issues with Trump will be smoothed over soon and he will be fully aboard the Trump Train again.
His motto: Border, Language, Culture is indeed a blueprint for Trump’s campaign themes and it has been great to listen to his frequent Trump interviews.
Again, if not for the recent aforementioned conflict, I would have included Michael Savage (with Hannity and Ingraham).
P.S.
I plan to continue listening to The Savage Nation for the time being. I hope he won’t have any more misgivings about supporting Mr. Trump!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3370003/posts?page=15#15
I called Jeff Kuhner ( WRKO 680am Boston ) a day or so later and told him my theory and he said "I never thought of that". I think I need my own radio show ;-)
Savage is the architect of Trump’s message.
I disagree.
TRUMP IS THE ARCHITECT OF TRUMP’S MESSAGE!
Trump and Savage just happen to see many things the same way.
I have listened to plenty of Savage since the mid 90’s; I have also heard Trump occasionally since the 80’s - and have read excerpts from some of his books much more recently.
I agree with Savage’s “Border-Language-Culture” message - I always have.
My problem - my great problem - is that he claims to have invented virtually all aspects of patriotism and intellection.
Trump has been holding some of these views since long before Savage was ever on the air; I myself have been holding some of these views since long before Savage was ever on the air.
I agree with Savage more than with Limbaugh, Levin, et cetera, but I am absolutely sick of the gargantuan egomania of these talk show hosts - especially of Levin and Savage.
Savage has a radio program to get his message out. That doesn’t mean that he invented everything in that message!
I am therefore sick of Savage trying to take credit for every worthwhile idea extant.
Truth...the new hate speech.
You can use any bathroom you “feel” like. But there are those that HAVE to vote for Hillary because she has a vagina.
Rush is a great band.
Another Hillary supporter outted. If shit was electricity, Rush would be a powerhouse. He like you is Establishment Republican and would prefer Hillary in the White House instead of Donald.
Trump wins in landslide.
She knows she cannot win it, so it is not surprising that she has let herself go.
“I think Trump would beat Bernie, but I think he would just MOP THE FLOOR with Hitlery.”
I want Trump vs. Hillary just to see him pummel her so bad she has to be involuntarily admitted to rehab.
“She should be hitting the treadmill three hours a day”
That would interfere with her hitting the bottle three hours a day.
In the age of the “smartphone”, that voter fraud stuff is going to be very hard to pull off.
Hillary has the globalist money bags in her pockets. Voters, not so much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.