Posted on 05/16/2016 8:43:19 AM PDT by Biggirl
On Sundays MediaBuzz on the Fox News Channel, The Kelly File host Megyn Kelly discussed meeting with presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump at Trump Tower to clear the air after feuding since the first GOP debate.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
No...it is proof that most viewers went to public school.
If you believe Megyn Kelley is conservative, you're the idiot.
I am a Trump supporter, but he screwed up when he attacked her. Some conservatives are upset because she asked Trump a perfectly legitimate question in the debate, a question he did not want to answer.
If you question her conservative credentials, watch the interviews she did with Bill Ayers and Ward Churchill. She destroyed them both.... while all America watched.
The leading conservatives on Talk TV are:
Hannity
Dobbs
Perro
Kelly
Goldberg
Hume
Gretta
Wallace
Who would you hold out as more conservative, (someone with a sizable TV audience, who has higher ratings than the taxicab dispatching radio in Toledo)?
The Crybaby Conservatives who love to rant: “Oh. he/she is not conservative enough” will be attacking Trump soon.
“Word on the street is she got her big break on Fox News by sitting on Brit Hume”
Complete trash mouth BS. You don’t even make up things very well. I represented FOX in a matter when she came on board. She earned it with skill and hard work.
Yeah, it clearly was the end of him, Mr. Conventional Wisdom.
MK is a boring, lightweight egoist.
The fact that you're so impressed with her is all I need to know about you.
I watched who attacked her for years during her legal years at Jones Day. It was always one group, usually women.
She lead the legal representation of Experian, which was always in the sights of regulators and plaintiff’s litigators. One does not get that job as a lightweight.
Did you ever take an hour and review her interviews of Bill Ayers or Ward Churchill? She destroyed them both on the air.
Did you ever take a moment and watch the video of her asking the question of Trump, and his response? It was a perfectly legitimate question, and he did not answer it.
I am very much in favor of Trump over Hillary, but would rather he had answered the question rather than “blaming” the question on her monthly cycle. It was no secret that he was going to go after at least one moderator, but Chris Wallace would have been a much better target.
By the way, the women who always went after her? It was almost always fat ugly women, often power dykes, of which DC is full.... or the occasional male wimps who could not stand a strong woman.
Wonder if there are any of those here.
Trump is NOT the one who said anything about Maggie's monthly. Some Cruz supporting, half baked wordsmith is the one who said that is what Trump said.
I saw what mad-hatter Maggie did in that debate when she launched on Trump. I think you are trolling.
I love when all you Alynskyites always attack the poster, not the post.
Everyone who doesn’t drink the Kool Aid is a “troll.”
Wow.
I do NOT give a rat's behind what you love. You misrepresented what actually took place. I called you out... IF you want to label that an Alysnkyite move, no surprise... I would call your whole post right out of the Rules for Radicals. I watched Maggie show her ass and she earned every ounce of ridicule she got. You just got to be a lawyer!!!
By the way, watch the question and answer at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y9_LJj7A68
Since the question was completely factual, what was wrong with it?
Her questions simply was, how are you going to deflect Hilary’s criticism we “war on women?”
He could have given a great answer, but he chose to refuse to answer it. I’m a maxed-out $ Trump supporter, but “fat pigs” and “disgusting animals” was far from his best moment.
Of course I’m an attorney. No one likes lawyers, until they need one.
Please, go have your temper tantrum elsewhere.
I do not have discussions with profane, crass, unthinking people. Good evening.
“Why on earth would a supposed smart woman Maggie even give credence to lies from Hillery?”
Because some of the voters do, and in asking the question, she was giving Trump a chance to defuse the situation. He should have picked up on it. Not his best moment.
EOS
Could it be that because you are an 'attorney', you are programmed to take Maggie's side? That was a supposed debate, and I personally found Maggie to be offensive and childish. Ah, I have had my fair share of exposure to how the trained attorney's mind works... I use to work with and for several. One of my children is an attorney. It is NOT about 'hate', liberals favorite go to word these days. You and I see differently the same exchange. AND it is just plain NOT factual that Trump referred to Maggie's monthly.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/redstate-erickson-disinvite-trump/2015/08/08/id/669124/
“His comment was inappropriate,” said Erickson.
“It is unfortunate to have to disinvite him. But I just don't want someone on stage who gets a hostile question from a lady and his first inclination is to imply it was hormonal. It just was wrong,” he said.
lol, reminds me of a friend who uses the line “it’s your lie, tell it how you want”.
Ah Megyn, so trite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.