[ameribbean expat]

Well, well, well.

[beethovenfan]

Let there be three bathrooms: one for men who know they are men, one for women who know they are women, and one for those who are confused.

[Sacajaweau]

Single stall bathrooms are the solution. Absolutely no reason to do harm to innocents (mind or body) in the name of LGBTL...or whatever they are.

[Bogie]

Allen Ginsburg?

[PGR88]

Ginsberg probably doesn’t now agree with her earlier statements - because leftists have no bedrock principles. They are always prepared to be swayed by the times they live in, and do whatever is politically necessary.

[Mike Darancette]

Nothing worse than seeing hairy legs through the bottom of the stall, whew some other woman.

[R_Kangel]

.... What if my Dog has to go to the bathroom? Wouldn’t it be cruel and inhumane to make her go outside with everybody watching her? I’m getting a lawyer!

[80skid]

Trough urinals, bring it back. Ends this lunacy.

[Amendment10]

Regarding the referenced article, I had forgotten all about the ERA.

Equal Rights Amendment

Are patriots aware that the failure of the ERA basically nullifies PC, pro-gay interpretations of the 14th Amendment’s (14A) Equal Protections Clause (EPC) imo, state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices now using PC interpretations of EPC to justify gay “marriage."

In other words, if 14A’s EPC was intended to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex as activist justices have now argued concerning gay “marriage” for example, then there would have been no need for the EPA imo.

Insights, corrections welcome.

[jwalsh07]

Any doubt in your mind that she has “evolved”?

[Yaelle]

Senator Larry Craig promises to fight with all he's got against single entry restrooms.

[Cboldt]

I can't think of a single instance where deviating from old "rigid norms" hasn't evolved into absurd rulings. Whenever a judge says it is absurd that their pet ruling won't eventually result in some defined absurdity, it is prudent to assume that the absurdity is a near certain eventuality. Some other judge will insist on it, and they will circle the wagons and defend the absurdity.

In short, the courts are transparently inconsistent and arbitrary. Their claim to legitimacy based on logic and "rule of law" is worthless.