“Gross Negligence” is a phrase that is important to an espionage case.
Our girl Hillary is in deep trouble.
She’s just destroying the Democrat Party.
This isn't an espionage case, and you discredit the investigation by calling it that. Clinton may have "sold secrets", but even she isn't stupid enough to leave around evidence of it.
Setting aside the potential for conflict of interest (the donations to the Clinton Foundation while she was SoS), this is really about her failure to safeguard the secrets that were entrusted to her. That's "gross negligence", not espionage (which requires intent).
Clinton is trying to misrepresent it as "not marked classified" (it doesn't matter), and as "mistakes were made" (an admission of guilt, in this case). But, only a relative handful of people have worked in the national security field, and know it's a smokescreen. She is counting on the media to carry her water and convince the rest of her version of the "truth".
>Our girl Hillary is in deep trouble.<
.
Wishful thinking.
Evil people are never in trouble in this country.
Correct, at least on the face of it. Unfortunately for our country, there is no doubt a back story involving a presidential pardon.
P.S. My recommendation is that you avoid spending time debating with folks who are unable to discern between dogs and humans. The former often rely heavily on assumptions; such as, if there is no public evidence there is no case.