Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six Aspects Of Donald Trump’s Pro-Gun Push
Breitbart ^ | May 5, 2016 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 05/05/2016 11:39:00 PM PDT by monkapotamus

Presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has a plan to defend gun rights in general and the Second Amendment in particular. The plan is visible in the policies set forth by Trump as well as his understanding of the value of the Second Amendment and the freedoms it guards.

Here are six aspects of his plan.

National Reciprocity for Concealed Carry...

Understands Concealed Carry As ‘A Right, Not A Privilege...’

Opposes ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban...

Opposes Expansion of Background Checks...

Supports ‘Harsh Penalties’ For Gun Crime...

Arm U.S. Troops On Military Bases...

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2ndamendment; awrhawkins; banglist; breitbart; election2016; guncontrol; guns; newyork; rtkba; secondamendment; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Jim Noble
...A reciprocity bill that could pass this Congress will likely take the form of a "national permit", or "national standards" state permits must meet in order to be honored.

Right now, I have NH, Massachusetts Class A, Virginia and Florida CCW. Residents of at least 40 states have CCW requirements less stringent than a "national standard" would look like.

In order to get a permit under Congressional mandate that would be honored in NY and CA, the residents of those 40 states would be substantially inconvenienced...

I disagree. A national "shall issue" permit would be just fine. The problem is that a few states have "may issue", or "no issue" laws and policies. This is the real "inconvenience", and it is far more than an inconvenience. It is an infringement on an enumerated right.

And, there is nothing preventing a state from issuing its own permits, which could be significantly more lenient than the national one. By your own admission, you have permits from 4 jurisdictions. Reducing this to just a state and a national permit would be more convenient for you.

Exactly what inconvenience would a national permit have? A waiting period? I have already waited decades, 90 days would be a miracle to most of us. Training? There are already court decisions on that -- if you require training you must allow ranges.

Go ahead, bring on a national permit. it would be a great improvement.

21 posted on 05/06/2016 7:52:20 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Look here for what you want.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=trump+guns


22 posted on 05/06/2016 3:14:51 PM PDT by B4Ranch (https://www.22kill.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson