Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is There Not Cause to Fight for Conservatism?
Conservative Review ^ | 04/20/16 | David Serenda

Posted on 04/20/2016 6:52:40 PM PDT by writer33

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: Cats1
Legal immigration is allowed last I checked.

The "good ones" have already violated US immigration law. How will the be eligible for legal immigration unless they're given amnesty?

81 posted on 04/21/2016 10:37:31 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Don’t know the laws about allowing them in versus keeping them out. Guess the people that do know the laws will have to decide.


82 posted on 04/21/2016 10:52:25 AM PDT by Cats1 (Trump supporter till the bitter end because I don't support thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Cats1
Don’t know the laws about allowing them in versus keeping them out. Guess the people that do know the laws will have to decide.

So we could very well still end up granting amnesty to millions of them.

At best, we'll have a wall but unless something happens to reign in executive power the next President can decide to just leave the doors standing open and we're not much better off than we are now.

83 posted on 04/21/2016 11:02:08 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

unless something happens to reign in executive power the next President can decide to just leave the doors standing open and we’re not much better off than we are now.
~~~~~~

Yup. Hill, Bern, or GOP.


84 posted on 04/21/2016 11:09:15 AM PDT by Cats1 (Trump supporter till the bitter end because I don't support thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Cats1
Yup. Hill, Bern, or GOP.

What we need is a leader who can rally and organize the people and the states to reclaim their authority and take control of the mess, but Donald Trump is not that man.

85 posted on 04/21/2016 11:12:58 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Your successful destruction comment tells me you want some kind of measurable end date. If you knew it would never be done you wouldnt ask it that way. The success is by purging out the known existing and their enablers, and then keeping out those that would try to weasel back in, and it always has to be monitored and measured and dealt with. Success is measured continuously because it requires eternal vigilance.


86 posted on 04/21/2016 11:18:46 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Your successful destruction comment tells me you want some kind of measurable end date. If you knew it would never be done you wouldnt ask it that way. The success is by purging out the known existing and their enablers, and then keeping out those that would try to weasel back in, and it always has to be monitored and measured and dealt with. Success is measured continuously because it requires eternal vigilance.

How was I supposed to know it would never be done? You never answered the question when I asked. Someone else stepped up and offered and explanation, and apparently you don't agree with it.

87 posted on 04/21/2016 11:27:32 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Twice now i have explained it.


88 posted on 04/21/2016 11:31:30 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Twice now i have explained it.

But the comment you're complaining about came before those explanations, and was directed to someone else.

89 posted on 04/21/2016 11:35:49 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Actually I see now that what you're complaining about was my initial comment to you.

Applying your explanation in the context of the original question - "Is There Not Cause to Fight for Conservatism?", the answer is that "Destroying the uniparty is what this is all about.".

In response to the question of when then uniparty will be destroyed, the answer to that is "Never".

So now, and forever more the answer to the question ""Is There Not Cause to Fight for Conservatism?" is going to be "Destroying the uniparty is what this is all about."

It will never be "Yes.".

90 posted on 04/21/2016 11:51:38 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLnxSjg5ywA


91 posted on 04/22/2016 5:48:31 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson