'Outside the Bedroom, Women Must Wear a Scarf'-Mullahs force France to impose Islamic dress code

The Mullahs force France to impose Islamic dress code.

April 15, 2016

The Islamist mullahs of Iran are meticulously spreading their Sharia laws to other countries and cultures through various methods.

If they cannot conquer the world with their military and convert everyone to their radical version of Islam, they will do it in other shrewd ways.

The Islamic Republic succeeded in forcing Air France, with the silent compliance of the socialist French government, to force its women flight attendants to comply with Iran’s Sharia law, including wearing a scarf, long trousers (instead of skirts), and wide garments (to hide the shape of their bodies) even though these women would not set foot in Iran and even if they are only in a layover and would not set foot outside the plane. Once they leave France, the female flight attendants have to comply with the dress code of Iran. They are not even allowed to smoke, even though the French men are allowed too.

Air France has told its stewardesses that: ‘Outside the bedroom, women must wear a scarf and a wide and long garment to conceal their shapes.”

As the pressure against such policy is mounting in France, Air France has agreed to give the female air hostesses and pilots the choice to opt out of flights to the Islamic Republic.

Nevertheless, Air France officials pointed out that they would not change their current policy at this moment. What Air France is failing to recognize is that it is basically following the Islamic Republic’s Sharia and Islamist law that views women as non-human, objects created to only satisfy men in bed.

Air France's decision and the acquiescence of the French government pose a significant danger to principles of democracy. The Islamist state of Iran, and other Islamist countries and militia groups, view this act as a victory for Islam and spread of Islamism.

Once you give them an inch, they want a mile. Concessions mean weakness for them.

Iranian leaders are already emboldened. They are asking all Western countries to remove un-Islamic things, such as wine, statues, posters which depict women without their hair covered, etc, when Iranian politicians visit their country. France previously accepted such Islamist requests by eliminating wine and other un-Islamic objects at the arrival of Iranian mullahs in Paris.

The underlying issue is mutual respect. The ignorant and foolish Iranian mullahs want other countries to follow their Sharia law whether they are on the soil of the Islamic Republic of Iran or in their own country. So why are the Iranian politicians unable to respect other countries' values? Why do Iranian leaders threaten to cancel their trip to Paris because wine is going to be served at dinner? Why does France succumb? Why does the West follow the mullahs' demands to become “Islamic” in their own countries? Why does the West not tell the Islamist regime of Iran that if you want us to respect your rule, you have to respect ours too? The Islamist regime of Iran should not have it both ways.

The intriguing issue is that the current government of France, which is run by the socialist party and President François Nicolas Hollande, has not made any objections towards Air France’s decision. The socialist party is pursuing the same appeasement policies that President Obama is following regarding the Islamic Republic.

When the Islamist state of Iran was established, the mullahs began exporting their radical Islamist ideology to other countries in the region. It was the belief of the Islamic Republics's founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and the current ruling politicians, that Iran’s version of Islam will conquer the world. Khomenei and his successor Khamenei are the other side of the coin of Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State.

The ruling clerics began imposing their Sharia law on other countries through wars and financing, training, and arming Shiite Islamist militia groups. After all, they strongly believe that they are following Muhammad’s route of conquering the world and imposing Islam on everyone. The exportation of Iran’s Islamist principles was not limited to the region.

By forcing its female citizens to wear hijab, France is basically assisting the Islamic Republic in spreading its jihadist, Islamist rules, and Sharia law to other Western countries. In addition, by imposing hijab on its female crewmembers, France is sacrificing the fundamental human rights, civil liberties, and freedoms that are the underlying pillars of a democratic nation-state system.

The fact is that, unshackled from the United Nations Security Council’s economic sanctions, the Islamist mullahs of Iran are more blatantly exporting their radical Islam into the West. As shown above, some liberal politicians are assisting them in doing so. These revolutionary and Islamist ideals are critical dangers and should not be allowed to penetrate democratic Western societies.

It troubles me to say it but the EUROWEENIES are hoist on their own petard!

There’s only one way to deal with these muslim killers: BOMB THE CRAP OUT OF THEM!
To end WWII and save the lives of perhaps another hundred thousand or more American troops, we dropped nukes on two Japanese cities directly killing over a quarter of a million men, women, CHILDREN and BABIES, nearly all of them CIVILIANS who just happened to be governed by a gang of militaristic maniacs bent on dominating the world. Many more of them perished in the months and years following. Some of those civilians probably disagreed with their rulers but they died just the same.
And our historically ignorant citizens have forgotten the February, 1945 FIREBOMBING of Dresden as the war in Europe was winding down. In what has correctly been called vindictive “payback” for the London Blitz, the allies suffocated and incinerated more than 150,000 mainly civilian German men, woman, children and babies. An exact count of the dead could never he determined as most of the bodies were reduced to ashes. .
How do THOSE situations differ from how we should deal with these muslim murderers? And, if it came to it, would we get grief from the OTHER nuclear powers, Russia and China – who ALSO have problems with muslim murderers of their own?
All those dead Japanese and German CIVILIANS are today called “collateral damage”.
And if the Pakistanis who also have nukes and and have been siding with the murderers for decades – even SHELTERING BIN LADEN! – take active exception to our making Raqqah and Mosul – and now, thanks to Clinton’s destabilization of Libya, parts of that country as well – glow in the dark, we probably have a few nukes – and incendiary devices – in the arsenal with their name on them.

Here’s how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States — Muslim 1.8%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 5.2%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77..5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.