Really?
I wouldn't use that final word even about a democrat I despise.
I have seen nothing in the news that would justify the absurdly optimistic Cruz Rising tonne of this article, but I also have seen nothing in this thread or anywhere that would justify the attack you chose (or any attack against either Trump or Cruz, or their wives).
Personal attacks are both unnecessary and unhelpful. Does anyone benefit other than Hillary, Bernie, Jeb, Rubio, Kasich, and others who consistently support Amnesty, who consistently support Obamacare, and who consistently support restrictions on our individual, God-given right to keep and bear arms?
Decent Americans are better off with a real truce, and not just a “I’ll stop when every person who even pretends to support the other side stops” gesture toward a truce that will never happen.
The nonsense is not helping us to elect the best possible conservative in November. I want 99% or more of Cruz supporters to vote Trump, when he is nominated, even if they hold their noses. In the event that Cruz wins the nomination, I want 99% or more of Trump supporters to vote Cruz, even if they hold their noses. Offending the other side does not encourage them to vote Trump (or Cruz) in November.
I cannot help wondering how many of those who stir up the Trump-Cruz wars are actually paid trolls taking Jeb/Hillary/Soros money to cause trouble - not all of them but probably enough to set the toxic tone.
I stand by my recurring statement:
Cruz and Trump are both imperfect but they agree far more than 80% of the time (see my tagline from Ronald Reagan). They should be friends and allies, and we should treat both of them as such.
Then you know little about Goldman Sachs work the last few decades.
Good points. Let us hope that others will take heed.
You can always count on the Trumpets to sink to vile, disgusting language, much like their chosen one. At this point it is the Trumpet who doesn’t use nasty postings that is the standout and actually catches my attention.
>>Cruz and Trump are both imperfect but they agree far more than 80% of the time...<<
Are you kidding? Trump doesn’t agree with himself even 80% of the time. How is Cruz supposed to best that?
Do you think, for instance, Cruz considers Putin a “strong leader” in the sense that Trump means it?
I would wager that if you could actually get Trump to write down what he would do in terms of policy on 100 issues, he would be incoherent on well over half of them, and that Cruz would disagree with him most of the time.
For starters, Trump is not a constitutional conservative. As soon as the Constitution gets in the way of a President Trump, it will be treated as toilet paper, exactly the way he’s been treating the state delegate rules that have been getting in his way lately. Cruz, however, is the epitome of a constitutional conservative. The difference between the two is stark, and it amazes me how many people in here fail to realize that fact.