Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clarice Feldman: The War On Women Moves to Restrooms
American Thinker ^ | April 10, 2016 | Clarice Feldman

Posted on 04/10/2016 10:48:43 AM PDT by jazusamo

To accommodate the perceived wishes of a very small number of people, the federal government and many states are placing women and girls at risk of rape and assault in restrooms.

There are about a mere 700,000 transgender individuals in the U.S., or 0.3% of the adult population. As John Hinderaker correctly notes -- that makes them almost as rare as unicorns.

It doesn’t take a genius to realize that allowing men who decide they really want to be women to use women’s restrooms is a dangerous idea: not to the wise men of Charlotte, North Carolina who passed an ordinance allowing men to use women’s’ restrooms if they believed they were mistakenly inhabiting men’s’ bodies. Wiser heads in the North Carolina legislature prevailed and passed a law “barring cities from adopting anti-discrimination laws that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the laws in effect at the state level, which already cover race, religion, national origin, color, age, biological sex and handicaps.”

Mark Dayton, Andrew Cuomo, Apple, Pay Pal and Bruce Springsteen Gird for the Restroom Battle

To signal their belief that the transgendered have more rights than women and girls who want to be free of assault, rape, and child molestation when at their most vulnerable, the governors of New York and Minnesota, responded by banning nonessential travel state employee travel to that state. (One wonders why they just didn’t ban all non-essential out of state travel, but that would be too fiscally responsible, I suppose.) PayPal cancelled a planned center in Charlotte. Apple’s CEO Tim Cook was one of several high-profile tech CEOs who signed a letter to Republican Gov. Pat McCrory calling on him to repeal the legislation.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: civilrightsdivision; claricespieces; colleges; doj; educationdept; holder; homosexualagenda; jarrett; lgbt; lhamon; lorettalynch; obama; radialleft; schools; trannies; transgender; unisex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: All; jazusamo

“..Andrew Cuomo, Apple, Pay Pal and Bruce Springsteen Gird for the Restroom Battle ..”

These pervert supporters are OK having little girls in the same bathrooms as men.

Any parent, or grandparent, need to boycott (or campaign against) these NUTS, and so should all of us.


61 posted on 04/10/2016 1:34:07 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; upchuck
Thanks for the ping jazusamo.


Clarice Feldman ping.

If you'd like to be on or off the Clarice Feldman ping list, drop me a FReepmail.

62 posted on 04/10/2016 1:52:33 PM PDT by upchuck (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable. ~ JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Comment in Houston Chronicle after Annise Parker Hero ordinance is defeated:

Harold J. Norfleet · Prairie View A&M University
All I can say is good riddance to Annise Parker and her hero ordinance. To take something like a hero ordinance and hide it inside of proposition 1 which by itself was a pretty good deal in my opinion but the hero ordinance which would have allowed men to go into women's bathrooms and locker rooms is a bunch of BS. And if it was such a harmless ordinance then why all of the campaign ads about proposition 1? They never stated the fact that men who dressed as women would be able to go into women's dressing rooms was ok. They did not and still Annise Parker, with her wacky way of thinking forced her displeasure in it not passing and the only thing she was concerned with was the fact that men who think they are women cannot go into women's bathrooms and locker rooms freely. Once again Annise Parker adios to you and your bs.
Reply · 3 · Nov 4, 2015 4:13am

63 posted on 04/10/2016 2:01:47 PM PDT by Mr Apple (No to transgenders in women's restrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

It was a wonderful thing when the people shot down pervert Parker and her Hero fiasco, her tantrums were hilarious.


64 posted on 04/10/2016 2:08:42 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
...pervert Parker and her Hero fiasco, her tantrums were hilarious.

I know. I saw the nasty lesbian Parker on tv after the election and she was fit to be tied. Also, the Houston Comical the next morning showed closeup shots of Parker, insanely wailing her hands in the air and then for some reason, began pointing a finger at the sky, roflmao. (what that was all about, who knows, haha)

65 posted on 04/10/2016 2:22:50 PM PDT by Mr Apple (No to transgenders in women's restrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Why does Andrew Cuomo, the current Governor of New York, want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms? Is it because Cuomo himself has transgender tendencies.

Why does Mark Dayton, the current Governor of Minnesota, want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms? Is it because Dayton himself has transgender tendencies?

Why does Daniel Schulman, CEO of PayPal, want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms. Is it because Schulman himself has transgender tendencies?

Why does Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms? Is it because Cook himself has transgender tendencies?

Why does Bruce Springsteen want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms? Is it because delusional Springsteen himself has transgender tendencies? .

Why do the Civil Rights Divisions in the Department of Justice want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms? Is it because these folks in the Obama administration have transgender tendencies?

Why do Federal education authorities in the Department of Education want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms? Is it because these folks also in the Obama administration have transgender tendencies?

Why does Loretta Lynch want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders, into women's bathrooms? Is it because nasty scumbag Lynch herself has transgender tendencies?

Why does the most powerful woman in American politics, Valerie Jarrett, want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders, into women's bathrooms? Is it because nasty, scumbag Muslim Jarrett has transgender tendencies?

Finally, why does our Muslim President Obama want to allow nasty freaks of nature, transgenders -into women's bathrooms. I'd say it's because Obama himself has transgender tendencies?

66 posted on 04/10/2016 2:37:43 PM PDT by Mr Apple (No to transgenders in women's restrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
This whole public bathroom controversy is a bunch of nonsense. Go in there, do your business, and get out. Is that so difficult? I never understood the need to have separate bathrooms in the first place.

If all restrooms were stalls only, I might agree, but I don't want my 12 and 14 year old daughters to use a men's restroom with urinals....nope.

67 posted on 04/10/2016 4:03:05 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I’ve got three bathrooms in my house. Never had the need to make them gender specific. Then again, I don’t have any special snowflakes living with me.

I assume that all three of your restrooms are single user home types.....no problem with anyone using them but would you want your 14 and 15 year old daughters to use the men's room, urinals and all, at the local Wal-mart???????

68 posted on 04/10/2016 5:09:01 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
What you posted has nothing to do with separate bathrooms. Of course a boy should not be allowed to play on a girl’s team. That’s just common sense. Was that what we were talking about here?

There is an article on T.V. right now concerning a female transgender with a scholarship to Harvard who decided to , instead of starring on the women's swim team, to swim on the men's team....didn't do too well, tried to beat at least 1 opponent in each race (seldom did) and Harvard allowed it.....SICK.

69 posted on 04/10/2016 5:31:50 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
What is it with urinals? You are the second person to mention them and you make it sound like they are something dirty.

Actually, I was once thinking of putting one in my downstairs bathroom for guests. Just seems like a more hygienic way to handle it as otherwise, it gets all over the toilet seat and around the floor. However when I asked my plumber for a price, it was prohibitive. Not the urinal itself but the plumbing that would have to be done to hook it up. If I ever build a new house though, I'm putting one in.

70 posted on 04/10/2016 6:10:25 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

bmfl


71 posted on 04/10/2016 10:35:33 PM PDT by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

>>> Wow, it would be weird for me to go to a Walmart bathroom with men. Weird. Better start carrying my gun.

Yup. To me, the restroom whether at home or away is like Vegas (What happens in...). So the fellas should have privacy from us gals, & vice versa. An expectation to be able to let one’s hair down & get some, well... rest. Or relief, if that’s the better term. *sheesh*

I realize men are under no physical threat from wimmin in the restroom/locker, yet I deplored the decision to allow female sports reporters in what used to be exclusively male spaces. Mind you, that was well before cell phone cameras even became a common thing. Just horrible.

Funny how this state often muddles its politics but thank you to NC for getting one thing right. What if we still had Bev Purdue?


72 posted on 04/11/2016 12:48:06 AM PDT by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

IF I owned any commercial properties, I would take the multi-person use sized restrooms & remodel them into storage areas for supplies. Then I would take the SUPPLY CLOSET & remodel it into a ONE PERSON AT A TIME restroom.

I do not want any person of a questionable gender in any restroom with me at any time-—and I am pretty able to take care of myself.


73 posted on 04/11/2016 6:11:04 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I’ve got three bathrooms in my house. Never had the need to make them gender specific. Then again, I don’t have any special snowflakes living with me.

You're not addressing the issue. The LGBT crowd is demanding that they be allowed to go into one of your three bathrooms AT THE SAME TIME as when your wife or daughter go in. Got it?

74 posted on 04/12/2016 11:33:34 AM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Nope. That won’t happen in my house!


75 posted on 04/12/2016 12:15:41 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Nope. That won’t happen in my house!

LMAO!!

Mine either sir!

76 posted on 04/12/2016 4:34:34 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson