Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/09/2016 5:24:24 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: Kaslin

5.56


2 posted on 04/09/2016 5:25:24 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

wouldn’t surprise me if he tried it. it further wouldn’t surprise me if the court that he packed then upheld his crime.


3 posted on 04/09/2016 5:27:18 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

More DIM/LIB criminality. Justice needs to arrive for these traitors to the Constitution.


4 posted on 04/09/2016 5:28:20 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So then they need to consider him,wait as long as possible then reject him. Start over, repeat as necessary.


5 posted on 04/09/2016 5:28:44 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The president can only make recess appointments.


6 posted on 04/09/2016 5:29:34 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

LOL! Gregory L. Diskant has an opinion and like (you know what) everybody has one.


7 posted on 04/09/2016 5:29:54 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Pretty sound argument.


9 posted on 04/09/2016 5:31:05 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“If you do not consent, I will interpret that as consent.”

Just try it.


10 posted on 04/09/2016 5:31:11 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking, but I know what I'm thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It is never a good tactic to telegraph your true intent to the enemy unless you have overwhelming power.

Especially when dealing with anenemy as unscrupulous and as scurrilous as the democrats.

What the republicans should have done is kept their mouths shut about their intent.

Just say “We will perform our constitutional duties.”
and just drag out the process.

If it comes down to the wire and they have to start holding hearings just do it.

Then Bork the heck out of the vetting process.


11 posted on 04/09/2016 5:32:28 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Noah: 'When the animals began to pair up by specie and stand in line, I really took notice.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sounds like the way Cruz operates.


12 posted on 04/09/2016 5:32:50 PM PDT by dforest (Ted took your money and is laughing all the way to Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Obamatization of Amerika continues in overdrive. Stalin would be proud.


14 posted on 04/09/2016 5:40:07 PM PDT by Polyxene (Out of the depths I have cried to Thee, O Lord; Lord, hear my voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nope.

But this is much more possible. Under the 20th Amendment, the new Congress takes office on January 3 but the new President does not take office until January 20.

If the Democrats retake the Senate (which is fairly likely at this point), then regardless of who the next President is, Senate Majority Leader Chuckie Schumer will have almost 3 weeks to easily push through confirmation of all of Obama’s nominees on a party line vote, from the Supreme Court to the district courts. There will not be a damned thing that the minority Republicans will be able to do to stop it.


15 posted on 04/09/2016 5:42:30 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

> “...what to make of things when the Senate simply fails to perform its constitutional duty”

The Senate has no time limit to perform such ‘duty’. It has withheld advice and consent for now, that in itself translates to disapproval for a time, and the Senate has already declared that the matter will be taken up after the new President is sworn in. So the Senate will indeed perform its ‘duty’ on their own schedule, not Obama’s.


16 posted on 04/09/2016 5:43:08 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Will the general consensus become apparent that we no longer live in a Democratic-Republic, but are now watching an incremental coup d’ėtat before the election? What else needs to happen? What else does our wanabe emperor have in store? Do not doubt even the most far fetched speculation, as he has already given it thought, if not planned it. This will not end well for us, or him.
19 posted on 04/09/2016 5:45:51 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (The March to the Abyss is speeding up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Let them try it.


22 posted on 04/09/2016 5:50:05 PM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If they start down this sh!tty road we’ll have to burn every building in DC and kill ‘em all.


23 posted on 04/09/2016 5:50:25 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is why McConnell has been so “opposed”. They’re once again in this together, just figuring out how to con the people yet again.


24 posted on 04/09/2016 5:52:33 PM PDT by Kenny (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Wow they really want cwii to start.

Wonder why this jackwagon didnt mention this power when bush ii was in office and the biden said no scotus hearings the last couple years of term 2.

Try it and lets just get cwii going right now.


25 posted on 04/09/2016 5:53:03 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Real easy folks.

Senate committee considers appointment until January 19th, 2017.

Senate committee votes to reject appointment on January 19th, 2017.


30 posted on 04/09/2016 6:02:33 PM PDT by struggle (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bring his name up to the full Senate on December 31 and vote him down.


32 posted on 04/09/2016 6:08:01 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson