Supreme Court Rejects DC Madam Case (appeal to Justice Thomas filed)

The Daily Bail ^ | 2 hours ago

[drewh]

Ted Cruz breathes a huge sigh of relief, for now. Sibley has another plan.

Chief Justixe Roberts made his decision late yesterday:

Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts, the justice assigned to emergency appeals from the Washington, D.C. area. Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party, a sign of how little merit Roberts found in the application.

Undeterrred, Sibley writes on his blog that he will now appeal to Clarence Thomas:

Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to be relieved from the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing any of the D.C. Madam Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service Records.

Before I simply release the records in my possession, I must exhaust all judicial remedies. Accordingly, invoking Supreme Court Rule 22.4, I am renewing the Application with a second Justice, the estimable Clarence Thomas. I will wait to see what he says before taking my next step.

Anyway, it’s not like Sibley’s gonna let a little thing like the law get in his way, especially since he’s already lost his license to practice. He's biding his time to see what Clarence Thomas thinks (let's hope his name isn't implicated), before releasing the names himself. That's the end game here. Also, Mr. Sibley would like us to focus on Judge Garland.

Below is Sibley's complete response to CLG.

***

By Montgomery Blair Sibley

As you asked me to keep you in the loop, here is the latest on the D.C. Madam's records:

Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to remove the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing the D.C. Madam's Escort Service Records I believe relevant to the Presidential Election. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, I am now renewing that Application to Justice Thomas - a procedural second bite at the apple so to speak. I will wait upon his decision - which in the normal course should come by the middle of next week - beforetaking any further action regarding those Records. The Renewed Application can be found on my blog.

I have reviewed the putative D.C. Madam records released on-line and can state they are not the Records I seek to release. Instead, they appear to be those that I released publicly in 2007... [See also: CLG's 'DC Madam' Phone Records posted September 2007.]

Respectfully, I have sought to answer all your questions, so now I am going to ask you a few of my own: With the Wisconsin Primary now in the books and more primaries on the horizon:

1. Will the Press begin to "press" Chief Justice Roberts as to why he denied my Application in Supreme Court Case No. 15A1016? Is he a Caesar at the Coliseum turning his thumb up or down as the whim strikes him or does he have to account-through-legal-analysis for his decision to allow my First Amendment Political Speech to be muzzled by explicitly approving the refusal of the lower courts in his administrative jurisdiction to allow me to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order? (I trust you know for time sensitive or urgent questions, reporters can contact the Supreme Court Public Information Office at 202-479-3211, press 1.)

2. When will the Press begin to "press" D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland as to why his Court has refused – since March 9, 2016 – to address my Petition which seeks an order directing the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order. Notably, in Case No.: 16-3007, I requested Expedited Consideration which the Circuit Court also has refused to grant or deny creating in effect a judicial pocket veto without explanation and thus denying me the ability to appeal such a decision. (Such an inquiry can be directed to: Tracy Hauser Scarrow, (202-216-7460) Special Assistant to Chief Judge Garland.)

Background reading:

BAD NEWS FOR LYIN' TED: Supreme Court Adds DC Madam Case To Official Docket

[HLPhat]

>>Most of them have losses

It's not the losses that are the problem - but the character displayed when they're owned, or NOT.

http://www.amazon.com/Extreme-Ownership-U-S-Navy-SEALs-ebook/dp/B00VE4Y0Z2

 

(*) The leader is always responsible. (This is what they call "extreme ownership." Basically, leaders must always "own" the mistakes and shortcomings of their teams.)

THE LEADER IS ALWAYS RESPONSIBLE.

[DoughtyOne]

After a while there is just so much noise that I tune most of this stuff out.

I have studied Trump and believe he will make the best candidate based on his experience.

If you have something you don’t like, great. Cruz is not going to be the nominee. Enjoy not supporting anyone.

[MIA_eccl1212]

I dropped ALL support for W, when he said and I quote “Islam... means peace, its a religion of peace” about 4 days after 9/11...
New York was not even started on finding and burying her dead.

Anyone who believes that “Islamics are good people with a good and peaceful faith” are FOOLS. Islam and middle easterners other than persecuted Jews, Christians or extensively screened victims, must NEVER BE ALLOWED in this country... and should be hunted down and expelled before they can purchase the materials they need to bomb the next “gun free zone” they can isolate.

Islam is NOT Peace. it is a war plan. and as a fake phony religion, it must be excised from the American people, life, land, economy, ideals or opportunities this land offers.

The Bush’s and guys like them just don’t think that way... and they own Ted’s backside. period. If he was NOT one of theirs to begin with, he is now.

[HLPhat]

>>I have studied Trump and believe he will make the best candidate based on his experience.

Trump’s experience makes it plainly self-evident that he’s an amoral liberal who repeatedly FAILS to take responsibility and ownership for his failures.

That would be why my conservative neighbors in Colorao Springs voted against him in our caucus precinct 22-6.

But, he’s real popular in the rest of American culture... where homosexual perversity is “the law of the land”.

Good luck with that.

[HLPhat]

>>Anyone who believes that “Islamics are good people with a good and peaceful faith” are FOOLS.

 

Islam is a fraud like Mormonism and the Roman state-establishment are - and can only be exposed as such, and neutralized, by Truth Logic and Reason.

 

Jefferson knew that when he and America's founders made their republic a haven for "infidels of every denomination"

"...in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of it's protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination."

http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/connections/thomas-jefferson/history3.html

"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;

 

...

 

 that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. "

 

"I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"

--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786

https://www.google.com/webhp?#q=truth%20is%20great%20and%20will%20prevail%20if%20left%20to%20herself

 

 

Those sorts of historicaly relevant facts should be the substance of political debate - not the size of some mortgage shyster's hands.

[DoughtyOne]

Trump won’t need luck, and that reveals the difference between him and Ted.

Trump is qualified with a great platform.

Ted is not qualified with a great carbon copy platform.

[HLPhat]

>>Trump is qualified

 

“Talk to My Mortgage Professionals now!”

 “I think it’s a great time to start a mortgage company,”  Trump told a CNBC interviewer in April 2006, adding that “the real estate market is going to be very strong for a long time to come.”

“who knows more about financing than me”

--Donald Trump

http://www.google.com/#q=%22who+knows+more+about+financing+than+me%22+Trump+Mortgage

 

That Trump?

 

Please enumerate the conservative principles that constitute Trump's moral character?

[DoughtyOne]

Just tell us. We’ll make the call.

I’m sure there are some facilities near your location where you can get excellent medical treatment.

There’s no need to go this alone. Great physicians are nearby.

Just reach out. We’d be glad to help.

[HLPhat]

>>We’d be glad to help.

Great. Please enumerate the conservative principles that constitute Trump’s moral character?

[DoughtyOne]

You’ve had ten months to figure that out on your own.

Once again you demonstrate deficiencies that indicate you may need intervention.

Tell us. We’re here for you.

[HLPhat]

>>You’ve had ten months to figure that out on your own.

Yep and here’s the list:

{null}

[DoughtyOne]

I’m sorry, we were talking list, not your IQ.

[HLPhat]

"Null is a special marker used in Structured Query Language (SQL) to indicate that a data value does not exist in the database."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_(SQL)

SELECT Concepts FROM Trump WHERE ConceptType = 'CONSERVATIVE'

Given the above Query, please enumerate the resulting set of conservative concepts that would be returned Trump's moral database?

 

SELECT Wives FROM Trump

{Wife1,Wife2,Wife3}

See, that's a set that can be enumerated.

[DoughtyOne]

Wow, thank you...

Who would have known that?

Everyone!

The heck you say...

Your IQ is a null set.

[HLPhat]

IQ isn’t measured as a set.

{Null} is the set of Trump’s conservative precepts you’ve been able to enumerate.

Let’s look at another interesting Trump result set:

SELECT Consultants FROM Trump WHERE Establishment = True

{RoyCohn,RogerStone,...}

Shouldn’t that set be empty?

[DoughtyOne]

You poor thing.

You think nobody understood what I was saying.

The one thing all you CruzBots have in common, is that you live in a fantasy world, thinking your guy is actually qualified, that he is actually a Conservative, that he does actually have achievements...

Like I said, please let us know. We’ll make the call for you.

So far you’re firing blanks. I’m sure you think you’ve really scored too.

LOL

[HLPhat]

>>The one thing all you CruzBots have in common,

Except I’m not a CruzBot.

I’m an American citizen who’s wondering - Given the following Query:

SELECT Consultants FROM Trump WHERE Establishment = True AND MoralCharacter = ‘Pervert’

 

{RoyCohn,RogerStone,...}

 

Why isn’t that result set empty?

I suspect the nature of your disingenuous “answers” is probably a clue about why the candidate database has become systemically corrupt and is returning such an abhorrent result.

[caww]

Trumps new man “Manafort”... who Trump took on to manage his entire campaign now, has strong ties with the old guard elite members...Ford, Dole to name a few. He's a hard hitter when it comes to his role and no doubt Trump would not have taken him on if he wasn't..... The man represented Putins favored Ukrainian President that was deposed during the revolution there . ....Wonder if Putin recommended the guy HAHAHAHA!

At any rate...this now moves to a very serious higher stakes game and all involved know this. It will now be all about how they maneuver on the board and make their plays....mind-bending ahead! You can bet those who are movers and shakers, all heavy hitters, are working behind the scenes big-time, advising etc.......we will only see the actual results of how they move the candidates on this board as the game continues...

Absolutely a fascinating and engaging election to be sure!

[DoughtyOne]

I’ll give people a chance at a sane dialogue.

After a point, I just write them off.

Continue to spew. I don’t mind.

Folks have moved so far beyond what you are focused on.

It’s pointless to treat what your saying as something serious enough to respond to.

[HLPhat]

>>Folks have moved so far beyond what you are focused on.

Well, that’s the attention span of Reality TeeVee sheeple for ya.

Enjoy the Bread and Circuses you’ll get from that {null} list of conservative principles.