Skip to comments.
Trump Just Attacked Scott Walker For Being Too Conservative
The Daily Wire ^
| March 31, 2016
| Aaron Bandler
Posted on 03/31/2016 2:40:50 PM PDT by DrewsDad
Real estate mogul Donald Trump continues to reveal his true leftist colors, smearing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) for being too conservative.
After Walker endorsed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Trump unleashed a barrage of leftist talking points against Walker.
"Theres a $2.2 billion deficit and the schools were going begging and everything was going begging because he didnt want to raise taxes cause he was going to run for president," Trump said. "So instead of raising taxes, he cut back on schools, he cut back on highways, he cut back on a lot of things."
Townhall's Guy Benson points out that Trump had previously leveled this smear towards Walker in September, even though The Washington Post, PolitiFact and FactCheck.org all of which are leftist fact-checkers all discredited the attack. Wisconsin had a projected $2.2 billion deficit at one point in 2014, but there was never an actual deficit since state law requires the budget to be balanced, which is what Walker did. Radio host Charlie Sykes confronted Trump on his lie, and Trump put the onus on Time Magazine, even though the magazine got the number from Trump himself.
But what's even more disturbing is that Trump's criticism of Walker suggests that Trump's first instinct is to raise taxes to balance the budget rather than conservative spending, which used to be a cardinal sin in Republican primaries. It's also bad economics, as economist Thomas Sowell explains:
In 1920, when the top tax rate was 73 percent, for people making over $100,000 a year, the federal government collected just over $700 million in income taxes-- and 30 percent of that was paid by people making over $100,000. After a series of tax cuts brought the top rate down to 24 percent, the federal government collected more than a billion dollars in income tax revenue-- and people making over $100,000 a year now paid 65 percent of the taxes.
How could that be? The answer is simple: People behave differently when tax rates are high as compared to when they are low. With low tax rates, they take their money out of tax shelters and put it to work in the economy, benefitting themselves, the economy and government, which collects more money in taxes because incomes rise.
High tax rates which very few people are actually paying, because of tax shelters, do not bring in as much revenue as lower tax rates that people are paying. It was much the same story after tax cuts during the Kennedy administration, the Reagan administration and the Bush Administration.
With conservatives growing increasingly distrustful of Trump, this smear against Walker will only continue to drive a wedge between Trump and conservatives going forward.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; cruz; cruzcorkerbill; cruzh1b; cruzsoccerball; cruztpa; globalistcruz; moosebitsister; noteligiblecruz; openboarderscruz; scottwalker; scottwalkerpimp; trump; unipartyposter; wi2016; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161 next last
To: T. P. Pole
Again that is not my experience
101
posted on
03/31/2016 3:41:32 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: kiryandil
I think we fall on different sides, but I can respect your reasoning. I love my country, but it is sliding away...
102
posted on
03/31/2016 3:43:33 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: nickcarraway; neocon1984
I heard him say something about reading Time. Let’s make sure he gets a copy before the morning briefing.
103
posted on
03/31/2016 3:43:48 PM PDT
by
huldah1776
( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
To: T. P. Pole
I get that.
I see that you're a Cheesehead. Are you well-versed on the state's economics? Such things make most people's eyes glaze over.
To: fatez
The story of my voting life. My guy never seems to win either.
To: fatez
Fatez, IMO Cruz is nothing more than Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain, and Romney.
Up until Cruz, those types were not working out for us.
We both agree with that.
Trump is different in that he hasn’t been working in Washington, D. C. off and on for 17 years. While he did donate to buy face time, I’ve not heard of him demanding anything from Hillary that I would object to.
We can argue over stuff like that until the cows come home. It won’t do any good.
Trump is a businessman with a proven record of producing.
Our nation needs a producer right now.
Since 1992, we have been unable to beat the likes of Clinton by more than the skin of our teeth. And when we did, that person let us down terribly.
So yes, some of us are backing someone different. The folks we settled on in the past have led us to where we are now.
Trump may not be the best man we’ve very had. He’s certainly going to be better than Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain, and Romney.
Cruz having worked for bush, now teaming up with the Bushes, Rubio, Romney, and most likely Kasich too, I’m very comfortable with backing Trump.
What can I say.
I played along to vote Bush in the second time. How did the nation benefit? It came very close to going belly up.
I think Trump is what the good doctor ordered.
Every medication has side effects. Trump will too. They also frequently get the job done.
Trump will too. IMO.
106
posted on
03/31/2016 3:45:44 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: fatez
You and I agree on that. I feel exactly the same way you do on it.
For his family’s sake, I hope he didn’t. I sure wish he could have just said that the other night. I have never cheated on my wife.
He couldn’t. That went over like a lead balloon.
107
posted on
03/31/2016 3:48:20 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: fatez
I have gone through the same thought process and my answer is no, I will not vote in the Presidential election if Trump is the Republican candidate.
I live in Washington state which will not go red under any circumstances. Even though I have voted in the 4 last presidential elections here, my vote has never really meant anything when it came to our electoral votes. So not voting for him doesn’t really matter as my vote is only the exercise of my own personal opinion.
I will vote in all other down ticket races where my vote will matter and hopefully oust that moron Inslee from the governor’s office.
The last time my vote mattered in a Presidential election was in 1980, 1984, and 1988 when I lived and California and the state went to Reagan and then to GHW Bush.
108
posted on
03/31/2016 3:48:55 PM PDT
by
CityCenter
(Suz for Cruz)
To: kiryandil
He and I are having a dialogue right now.
It remains to be seen how productive that will be.
I’m willing to reach out to people who show signs of being willing to discuss the issues.
109
posted on
03/31/2016 3:49:51 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: Reaper19
The way I read it, Trump painted Walker as a selfish conservative - more concentrated on his political image than on his state. As many politicians are.
Trump is also appealing to conservative democrats to cross-over. People relate to schools with stained ceiling tiles which property taxes/state income taxes are supposed to support. And then there’s potholes on the way to work, unemployment, etc. All cross-over topics.
and you should also take into account that we are day 3 into a 100-day campaign to sink Trump. If he sneezes into the wrong color or brand hankie, it will become some sort of issue.
110
posted on
03/31/2016 3:50:09 PM PDT
by
blueplum
(March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?)
To: Durbin
111
posted on
03/31/2016 3:51:08 PM PDT
by
Mechanicos
(Attend a Trump Rally and get to "Punch a Commie for Mommy.")
To: DoughtyOne; fatez
I think we’re all starved for reasonable dialogue, after the bot deluge of the last couple of months.
To: blueplum
conservative democrats = jumbo shrimp
113
posted on
03/31/2016 3:52:13 PM PDT
by
CityCenter
(Suz for Cruz)
To: Mechanicos
He's a #NeverTrumper disruptor/troller.
Ignore him. :)
To: dsc; DoughtyOne
You have not done anything to warrant any abuse and I don't think I have. And I get some Cruz supporters are obnoxious and probably self-righteous. If you see that in me, I am sorry. But I think I didn't deserve any of the garbage that other Trumpsters have dealt me. If you have read thru this thread today and saw all of my posts, this is as far as I take it.
Believe it or not, I am trying to make some points through humor, even if they are not funny. They are never meant to hurt. DoughtyOne is a big boy and gives as good as he takes and I respect that...
And BTW, I use Trumpsters affectionately and I think I may have been the first on FR to use it...
115
posted on
03/31/2016 3:52:54 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: fatez
There is a lot of name calling going back and forth (I find it much more common when dealing on forums that include leftists than here, even with the current battle of candidates). We each have an individual choice to react in kind or to try to handle it another way.
Currently I am trying to train myself to always respond calmly and with reason rather than getting my ire up. So far the other people have either calmed back down after losing some credibility, or gotten mad that they could not get a rise out of me, and went on to lose more credibility.
To: fatez
Thanks for your comments Fatez.
117
posted on
03/31/2016 3:53:54 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: AndyTheBear
Currently I am trying to train myself to always respond calmly and with reason rather than getting my ire up. So far the other people have either calmed back down after losing some credibility, or gotten mad that they could not get a rise out of me, and went on to lose more credibility. ++
To: CityCenter
So I live in Colorado, so I may have to vote because it is purple. If Hillary looks like she will win my state, then I will vote for the Constitutional Party and guess who the candidate is???
Tada, I don't know either...
119
posted on
03/31/2016 3:58:35 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: Slyfox
If Cruz doesn’t win Wisconsin which it looks that way. He will have won 1 contests out of 10. To me that means he should drop out. He has a bunch of 3rd places coming up in the northeast. He’s done Wednesday. He should have left after he lost the entire south, but Wednesday is fine.
120
posted on
03/31/2016 3:59:22 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson