Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor Helps Puerto Rico Argue Its Bankruptcy Case [Worst Ever Supreme Court Appointment!]
YahoNews ^ | March 23, 2016 | Noah Feldman

Posted on 03/23/2016 6:42:06 PM PDT by Steelfish

Sotomayor Helps Puerto Rico Argue Its Bankruptcy Case Noah Feldman

Before Tuesday, I’d have said that Puerto Rico had no chance to win its legal fight to let its municipalities and utilities declare bankruptcy. That's how the island hopes to resolve its overwhelming debt problems, but the federal bankruptcy code says that it can't.

That's what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held last summer, unanimously. The statute seemed so clear that even Judge Juan Torruella, the appellate court’s only Puerto Rican member, concurred in an outraged separate opinion criticizing the federal law.

Then Sonia Sotomayor stepped in. Oral arguments before the Supreme Court rarely change the outcome of a case, yet Tuesday's session may turn out to be the exception. In a fascinating and unusual argument, Justice Sotomayor, who is herself of Puerto Rican descent, spoke by my count an astonishing 45 times. Sotomayor left no doubt that she was speaking as an advocate.

The interpretation of the law she favored would make the system fairer to Puerto Rico, allowing the commonwealth to create its own emergency bankruptcy measures outside federal law. But it depends on a highly doubtful reading of the statute, one that stretches credulity when read into the text. Ideally, Congress will hear what happened at the oral argument and pass one of the reform proposals it’s currently considering that would spare the court from having to decide the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; puertorico; scotus; sotomayor; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Steelfish

Case will probably be “affirmed by an equally divided Court.” That would mean PR loses.


21 posted on 03/23/2016 7:13:38 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

She needs be impeached


22 posted on 03/23/2016 7:18:07 PM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Is anyone surprised that an Obama SCOTUS pick would blatantly flaunt United States Law??? And some dufus Republicans want to go ahead with Garland??? Appalling!!


23 posted on 03/23/2016 7:26:26 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Puerto Rico is what happens when you give a perfectly good island to Mexicans. It is a wonder it hasn’t capsized yet


24 posted on 03/23/2016 7:29:23 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Impeachment is easy, only need a majority of the House. Conviction is very hard, need two-thirds of the Senates. The Senate Democrats wouldn’t vote to convict her even she murdered of the Justices in open court. So she won’t be removed and impeachment is futile.


25 posted on 03/23/2016 7:32:47 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

C U Next Tuesday.


26 posted on 03/23/2016 7:42:32 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

She’s that “wise Latina” doncha know, just sharing her expertise with the side she advocates. Pathetic.


27 posted on 03/23/2016 8:05:30 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I don’t see what the problem is.

if PR wants to stop paying interest on its bonds,
just stop.


28 posted on 03/23/2016 8:37:37 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
It's no longer a Supreme Court.

It's a friggin' bastion for defending "politically correct" ideologies.

29 posted on 03/24/2016 12:26:04 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

That argument can be extended to most places. Imagine what Camden NJ would be like if the population were entirely Swiss.


30 posted on 03/24/2016 2:29:29 AM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

“La Federal government syndrome”

She is of Puerto Rican descent,she should be abstaining from the Case.


31 posted on 03/24/2016 11:09:15 AM PDT by Del Rapier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson