Posted on 03/22/2016 7:55:37 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
Things reveal themselves passing away, wrote W. B. Yeats.
Whatever one may think of Donald Trump, his campaign has done us a service exposing the underbelly of a decaying establishment whose repudiation by Americas silent majority is long overdue.
According to the New York Times, super PACs of Trumps GOP rivals, including PACs of candidates who have dropped out, are raising and spending millions to destroy the probable nominee.
Goals of the anti-Trump conspirators: Manipulate the rules and steal the nomination at Cleveland. Failing that, pull out all the stops and torpedo any Trump-led ticket in the fall. Then blame Trump and his followers for the defeat, pick up the pieces, and posture as saviors of the party they betrayed.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/the-rule-or-ruin-republicans/#FOpAKU8JDqAzPyhu.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
This was obvious long before Trump ran for President. The GOP establishment views the Democrats and Sorosites as well-meaning political opponents, a loyal opposition with whom they disagree with on the details while sharing the big picture of multiculturalism, political correctness, open borders, and internationalism. The mutual enemies of both the "liberal" Sorosites and the "conservative" GOP establishment are those who don't share their Davos transnational ideology.
The Uniparty is determined that the citizens will not be allowed to keep the rule of law or their country.
This whole exercise is about keeping The Cheap Labor Express running.
Flooding the country with fraudulently documented foreigners is the top priority of BOTH the R and D divisions ofthe Uniparty.
Support for open borders and amnesty (either outright or by stealth) have become THE litmus test for membership among the political establishment's elites. It's partly for the cheap labor, but it has also become an ideological point.
IMO, Pat is the best pundit writing today. He says it best:
“if the oligarchs, neocons and Trump-loathers, having failed to stop him in Cleveland, collude to destroy the GOP ticket in the fall, they have a chance of succeeding. And Clintons super PACs would surely be delighted to contribute to that cause.
But, again, what will they have accomplished?
Do they think that Republicans who stay loyal to the ticket will not see them for the selfish, rule-or-ruin, wrecking crew they have become? Do they think that if a Trump-led ticket is defeated, they will be restored to the positions of power and pre-eminence that a majority of their fellow Republicans have voted to strip away from them?
The Beltway has to come to terms with reality. It has not only lost the country; it has lost the party. It is not only these elites themselves who have been repudiated; it is their ideas and their agenda.
The American people want their borders secured, the invasion stopped, the manufacturing plants brought back and an end to the conscription of our best and bravest to fight wars dreamed up in the tax-exempt think tanks of neoconservatives.
Trump is winning because he speaks for the people. Look at those crowds.”
Buchanan was born for this moment ...
Patrick J. Buchanan: Trump Is Right on Trade [outstanding!]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3399142/posts
[Hard to find a single ‘pull quote’, will post entire column to ‘all’]
Trump Is Right on Trade
http://buchanan.org/blog/trump-is-right-on-trade-124822
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3399142/posts
Friday - February 19, 2016 at 4:24 am
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Republican hawks are aflutter today over Chinas installation of anti-aircraft missiles on Woody Island in the South China Sea.
But do these Republicans, good free-traders all, realize their own indispensable role in converting an indigent China into the mighty and menacing power that seeks to push us out of Asia?
Last year, China ran up the largest trade surplus in history, at our expense, $365 billion. We exported $116 billion in goods to China. China exported $482 billion worth of goods to us.
Using Census Bureau statistics, Terry Jeffrey of CNSNEWS.com documents how Beijing has, over decades, looted and carted off the greatest manufacturing base the world had ever seen.
In 1985, Chinas trade surplus with us was a paltry $6 million. By 1992, when some of us were being denounced as protectionists for raising the issue, the U.S. trade deficit with China had crossed the $10 billion mark.
In 2002, it crossed the $100 billion mark. In 2005, the $200 billion mark. In each of the last four years, Communist China has run an annual trade surplus at the expense of the United States in excess of $300 billion.
Total trade deficits with China in the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama era? $4 trillion. Total U.S. trade deficit in 2015 $736 billion, 4 percent of our GDP.
To understand why Detroit look as it does, while the desolate Shanghai Richard Nixon visited in 72 is the great and gleaming metropolis of 2016, look to our trade deficits.
They also help explain Americas 2 percent growth, her deindustrialization, her shrinking share of the world economy, and the stagnation of U.S. wages as manufacturing jobs are replaced by service jobs.
Those trade deficits also explain the rise of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.
Yet, with the exception of Trump, none of the GOP candidates seems willing to debate, defend or denounce the policies that eviscerated America and empowered the Peoples Republic.
Workers, however, know what our politicians refuse to discuss.
They are being sold out for the benefit of corporate elites who pay off those politicians with the big cash contributions that keep the parties flush.
Politicians who play ball with Wall Street and K Street know they will be taken care of, if they are defeated or when they retire from public office, so long as they have performed.
Free trade is not a zero-sum game. The losers are the workers whose jobs, factories and futures are shipped abroad, and the dead and dying towns left behind when the manufacturing plants shut down.
America is on a path of national decline because, while we have been looking out for what is best for the global economy, our rivals have been looking out for what is best for their own nations.
Consider OPEC, which is reeling from the oil price collapse. Russia is colluding with Saudi Arabia and Iraq to cut production to firm up the market and prevent prices from falling further.
This is pure price fixing, but we all understand self-interest.
What might a U.S. national-interest-based trade policy look like?
Controlling the largest market on earth, we might impose on foreign producers a cover charge, an admissions fee, a tariff, to get into our market.
Example: Impose a 20 percent tariff on foreign cars entering the USA. This might raise the cost of a Lexus or Mercedes produced and assembled abroad from $50,000 to $60,000.
However, if Lexus or Mercedes buys or makes all their parts in the USA and assembles all their cars here, no tariff. Their cars could still sell for $50,000. This would be a powerful incentive to shift production here. As an added incentive, all tariff revenue could be used to reduce or eliminate corporate taxes in the USA.
Between the Civil War and World War I, under Republicans, the U.S. became the worlds greatest industrial power and a wholly self-sufficient nation. How? We taxed foreign goods entering the United States, but did not tax the profits of U.S. companies or the incomes of U.S. workers.
The difference between economic patriots and globalists who inhabit corporate-funded think tanks and public policy institutes is that the latter think of what is best for their corporate benefactors and the global economy. The former put America and Americans first.
Academics revere Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Richard Cobden.
But none of them ever built a great nation. Patriots look to Alexander Hamilton and those post-Civil War Republicans who built the greatest national industrial powerhouse the world had ever seen.
Indeed, what great nation did free trade ever build?
As father of a united Germany, Chancellor Bismarck said, when he decided to build Germany on the American and not the British model, I see that those countries which possess protection are prospering, and that those countries which possess free trade are decaying.
So it is true today. Unfortunately, it is America, now wedded to the fatal dogma of free trade, that is decaying.
Pat Buchanan was anti-establishment before being anti-establishment was cool.
Unfortunately, 16 years ago people were too taken in by Team Bush to listen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.