Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why can’t three get married?
Mercatornet ^ | 3/21/16 | Michael Cook

Posted on 03/21/2016 8:23:58 AM PDT by wagglebee

You might think that this is grotesque. I certainly think it is grotesque. But should we be so judgemental about the unorthodox connubial arrangements of Anna and Lucy Decinque, 31-year-old identical twins who are sharing a bed with their 32-year-old electrical mechanic boyfriend Ben Byrne?

The trio have lived together for the last four years in Perth, Western Australia, with the girls’ mother.

The girls are inseparable, so much so that they have spent A$240,000 on various cosmetic improvements to look even more alike. They imitate each other and share everything. Even their boyfriend.

When Anna and Lucy appeared on the SBS current affairs program Insight last week, they announced that they wanted to become pregnant at the same time, even if one or the other had to use IVF. "[We] just have to be pregnant at the same time," one said. "Yeah, we just want to be the same in everything," the other chimed in.

Relationships with separate boyfriends had always failed, they said, "because we're with each other 24/7, every single day, every minute of our life together". So Ben treats them equally and they form a happy family.

So the question is: if the Australian Marriage Act is amended to allow homosexuals to marry, why can’t Anna, Lucy and Ben have their sincere love and tested commitment for each other recognised? It seems outrageously unfair to leave them unhitched and unhappy. After all, unless their polyamorous love is recognised by the majesty of the law, they will always be regarded as a freak show.

To a certain extent, still untested in the courts, they already are a de facto thruple. They have been living in a “marriage-like relationship” for more than two years, which is the condition for constituting a de facto couple in Western Australia. Ordinarily, a third woman (or man) in such a relationship would enter it later and the law would probably insist that only the original pair possesses the rights arising from a de facto relationship.

But because the Decinque twins have insisted on doing everything together, their relationships with Ben began simultaneously. It seems unfair that only one of them can have access to property, government benefits or care of children in the event of death or a relationship breakdown. Surely authentic equality means giving even this peculiar ménage a trois an opportunity to get married.

The bigwigs of the marriage equality movement in Australia say that they are absolutely -- cross their hearts and hope to die -- opposed to everything poly except Polynesia. But isn't it time that they woke up to the reality of diverse family structures in Australia today? Surley the lived experience of Anna, Lucy and Ben suggests that society needs to move beyond the antiquated dyadic hegemony they are promoting in their campaign for same-sex marriage.

A grotesque prospect? I agree. But that is the inexorable logic of the push for same-sex marriage. If all love is equal, why not polyamory?


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barfalert; gaymarriage; gaystapo; homofascism; homosexualagenda; islam; lavendermafia; moralabsolutes; polyamory; polyandry; polygamy; polygyny; rop; sexslavery; slipperyslope; ssm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: wagglebee

Laz would hit it TWICE!!!!


21 posted on 03/21/2016 8:43:09 AM PDT by ken5050 (Trump: "I'm no conservative, but I sure can play one on TV")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kenny500c

I have known several pairs of identical twins over the years (all girls/women, oddly enough) ... none of them needed any surgery to look like her twin.


22 posted on 03/21/2016 8:43:11 AM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kenny500c

I’ve known identical twins. There are usually slight variations that one can notice, particularly after a period of time. Some are more easily seen.


23 posted on 03/21/2016 8:45:17 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

I meant being legalized, but you make a good point. In fact, your point makes my prediction more likely.


24 posted on 03/21/2016 8:46:53 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Prayer for Victory is the ONLY way to support the troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

A quick glance at the vid indicated to me they did the cosmetic more to look Hollyweird than identical (duck lips, etc). Not cute...


25 posted on 03/21/2016 8:46:55 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Not my idea of beauty.


26 posted on 03/21/2016 8:48:39 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

all one of the sisters has to do is tell the courts that she self-identifies as the other sister (IE She believes, in her sick twisted adulterous mind, that she is her sister)- that way it will be a normal two person marriage because now anyone can identify as anything or anyone they choose and society has no right to question it apparently


27 posted on 03/21/2016 8:48:48 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

They must have lotsa dough to spend a quarter mil to look nasty, LOL.


28 posted on 03/21/2016 8:50:23 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

The Man marries one sister and she marries her sister

Since the man is married to only one woman, it is legal. A sister wedding a sister might be incesteous but there is thus no bigamy


29 posted on 03/21/2016 8:51:31 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Yes. It sounds like narcissism combined with obsession. What a waste of money.


30 posted on 03/21/2016 8:51:46 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bert

There’s still bigamy, being committed by the sister who’s married both to her sister and to the guy.


31 posted on 03/21/2016 8:54:55 AM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Thanks. I didn’t want to bother with the link.


32 posted on 03/21/2016 8:55:38 AM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I wonder if they get headaches at the same time?


33 posted on 03/21/2016 8:57:31 AM PDT by cowboyway ("Give me a beer or two and I'll be fine, at least that's worked every other time....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
But that is the inexorable logic of the push for same-sex marriage. If all love is equal, why not polyamory?

Polygamy is an ancient and quite stable social arrangement, as long as you have large land armies to soak up all the leftover young men. I am certain polygamy will be legal in the US as soon as the Supreme Court takes an on-point case.

Polyandry, on the other hand, has never worked and cannot ever work, because the men involved will kill each other or commit suicide in short order.

34 posted on 03/21/2016 9:00:53 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown, are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Or as Groucho Marx would say:

“Bigamy? Why, thatsa big a-you!”


35 posted on 03/21/2016 9:00:57 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bert

That’s still bigamy because the one sister is married to two people- but if she self identifies as a poodle, then the other two would only be charged with bestiality- but hey- who are we to judge? And at least there will be no icky bigamy going on- Perhaps one woman could self-identify as a deceased person- that way it would only be necrophilia- (and as in the days of Noah- everyone did what was right in their own eyes)


36 posted on 03/21/2016 9:03:59 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
They're looking for a "reality" show, no question.

Have to say they don't look very real, at this point.

Some greedy Outback veterinarian probably did it with instructions off youtube.

37 posted on 03/21/2016 9:05:57 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Nor might that be construed as ‘incestuous’, as the sisters cannot ‘formally’ fornicate/reproduce. More stigma opposition than biological.

I mean, if we’re going to take bizzaro logic to its bizarro conclusion...


38 posted on 03/21/2016 9:06:10 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

SMH, coming to a legislature near you.


39 posted on 03/21/2016 9:06:35 AM PDT by Jaded (Pope Francis? Not really a fan... miss the last guy who recognized how Islam spread... the sword.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I think a man who had to live with two wives might come close to killing himself...not everything is what it’s cracked up to be ;-)

-JT


40 posted on 03/21/2016 9:08:00 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson