Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Majority Threshold ‘Unfair’ in G.O.P. Nomination Process, Donald Trump Complains
New York Times ^ | March 20, 2016 | Nick Corasaniti

Posted on 03/20/2016 1:47:32 PM PDT by reaganaut1

With the prospect of a contested convention looming over the Republican presidential primary, Donald J. Trump on Sunday complained about the party’s rules requiring a candidate to have a majority of delegates to clinch the nomination outright.

Asked by George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week” why he should be “guaranteed the nomination” if he failed to amass the 1,237 delegates needed to win it on the first ballot, Mr. Trump said that he might be unable to clear that threshold. But he blamed the number of contenders in the Republican field.

“If I’m a little bit short – and one of the reasons was we had so many candidates,” he said. “I mean, we started off with 17 candidates.”

He added: “There are so many candidates, so it’s very hard to get over that number. It’s very unfair.”

He said that denying him the nomination under those circumstances would “disenfranchise” people who voted for him.

But the party’s national chairman, Reince Priebus, appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union,” defended the system for how Republicans choose their standard-bearer as a “delegate-driven process.” He noted that his own floor battle to win the chairmanship went to the seventh ballot, and said that a plurality alone would not be treated as a majority.

“History would show, whether it be Walter Mondale, Gerald Ford, when someone’s a little bit short, you know, you let the process play out,” he said. “And generally if it’s that close, generally that’s what happens. But certainly what I would say is that the minority of delegates doesn’t rule for the majority.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aawwwdonniesezunfair; aawwwhaveahankie; amnestypimpsonfr; angertrolling; concerntrollalert; consensuscracking; demagogicparty; election2016; forumsliding; hitandrunposter; inyourheadrentfree; memebuilding; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; nickcorasaniti; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; presidentdonaldtrump; reincepriebus; robertsrules; rule40b; stephanopoulos; tdsafternoonshift; topicdilution; trump; unipartynarrative; whinertrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Bobalu

Romney had 1473 of the 2286 delegates. He was way, way over the majority threshold.


21 posted on 03/20/2016 2:10:53 PM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Kasich is mathematically eliminated from reaching 1237.

Soon Cruz will also be mathematically eliminated.

If either drops out, Trump will easily exceed 1237.

If they stay in, it will only be to deny Trump the nomination. This would then be a hit job, not an election.

I don’t think Priebus understands just how pissed people are. I don’t think he understands how unglued people will become and what actions they will take to kill the republican party for good.

But I do think he doesn’t care because his future has been assured by the corrupt cartel.


22 posted on 03/20/2016 2:11:33 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What is problematic is the ‘elites’ plotting stop a single candidate.

What’s even worse is they are not openly supporting a candidate who is actually in the running.

They are looking for an opportunity to install a plan F or G or whatever version they are on now, and force on the party regulars a candidate who has possibly not even competed for the ‘prize’.

I understand that a plurality is not a majority. However, a plurality much more closely reflects the will of the voters than does a back room deal with someone who didn’t even have their hat in the ring through the grind, the endless debates, and most importantly, the voting.

I am hoping on one hand the GOP does not commit suicide through elitism, and on the other hand wondering if maybe it’s not about time we let them fall...


23 posted on 03/20/2016 2:11:46 PM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Exactly.

Trump has far more delegates than both Romney and McCain at the same time in history. The GOPe always, along with media allies, convinces all to drop out for "the good of the party" and coalesce around the leader. Now they're doing the exact opposite.

Further, Trump is on pace to have more votes than McCain and Romney COMBINED.


24 posted on 03/20/2016 2:12:47 PM PDT by nhwingut (Trump-Palin 2016 - Blow Up The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jobim
I was talking about delegates, in a contested convention, who are not Trump delegates deciding to go with Trump or Cruz. I am pretty sure Lil Marco, Lying Ted, Pedophile Ben and whatever he called Kasich delegates may not think of Trump too fondly.
25 posted on 03/20/2016 2:14:00 PM PDT by Iowa David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

>> So these rules didn’t exist before Trump decided to run? <<

Silly question. Mr. Trump should not be bound by any rules that he doesn’t like, regardless of when they were put into effect. Only his strong willpower can make America great again.


26 posted on 03/20/2016 2:18:51 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

As I recall those rules get changed often. Last time they were changed to prevent Ron Paul from getting to a floor fight with mitt


27 posted on 03/20/2016 2:19:53 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David

Yes, I knew what you referred to. My point is that Trump is spontaneous and wins supporters because of this, without regard to pleasing anyone for their delegates later. He may the price, or he may not; we shall see.


28 posted on 03/20/2016 2:20:10 PM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Say hello to president Clinton then


29 posted on 03/20/2016 2:20:54 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

He’ll arrive with more than enough.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/rule40b/index

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/robertsrules/index


30 posted on 03/20/2016 2:22:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Perhaps when candidates drop out, the delegates they have should not count towards the frontrunners 50% quota. Or have those delegates subtracted from the 1237 value.

That would seem fairer and a way to deal with so many people running just to deny anyone a decent chance at 50% or 1237.


31 posted on 03/20/2016 2:23:47 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Not nominating the clear frontrunner is a big FU to the millions who voted for him. There will be long term consequences if it happens. But I don’t think it will.


32 posted on 03/20/2016 2:24:35 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil

He didn’t say it wasn’t fair to him. Trump said it wasn’t fair to his voters

And Reince can go pound sand. Delegates are elected by voters. If he wants to be that petty and snarky I am sure folks would be happy to have him replaced


33 posted on 03/20/2016 2:25:00 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Great post!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3411557/posts?page=24#24


34 posted on 03/20/2016 2:25:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Perhaps it would be better if at the 1/3 way point only the top two candidates would be allowed to go on.

Only to those who live in the first few states. The rest generally get an abbreviated ticket due to drop outs, which is bad enough.

Keep in mind I support Cruz, who could certainly have used the delegates other candidates (Rubio, Kasich) soaked up which I do not think would have gone to Trump because of the differences between those candidates and Trump.

It's funny, but for years I have said it would be nice to be in an election year where the moderate (elite) GOP had to hold its nose and vote for a Conservative.

35 posted on 03/20/2016 2:29:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

I think that’s a good idea. For next time.

I have a few principled objections to changing rules mid-game.


36 posted on 03/20/2016 2:33:37 PM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Trump currently has Missouri, Georgia, Alabama, Illinois, Florida, Mississippi, Hawaii, Tennessee and Masssachussets, so he clearly has 8.

Cruz already has Wyoming, Texas, Idaho, Maine, and Kansas.

However, the number of states is determined by a certificate signed by the majority of delegates of the state submitted one hour before the nominations start. If Rubio’s delegates go for Cruz, he adds DC, Arkansas, Minnesota, Oklahoma and Louisiana, perhaps North Carolina as well, easily making the eight state threshold.


37 posted on 03/20/2016 2:36:50 PM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

They keep talking about a brokered convention, but I just don’t see it.

Shortly after Trump started his campaign, he told the story of his early days as a boxing promoter. He liked to hold out-of-town matches because the purse was larger. But he also know that the referees favored the local fighter. So he told his boxers, “Win with a knockout or come home a loser.” Trump said that was how he was approaching his “fight” for the presidency.

He is on track to meet all of the first round requirements, but it is close. But if he is only close, the Trump will make a deal. Deal-making is his specialty, and he will not come up short.

Get use to “President Trump”!


38 posted on 03/20/2016 2:40:58 PM PDT by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

39 posted on 03/20/2016 2:41:56 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

These were the rules when he started...he didn’t say they were unfair then. He’s saying that now because he knows he’s not going to get 1237.

Sorry Charlie he needs to work the delegates now if he plans to be the nominee. Either he hits 1237 (which he can do) or he needs to wheel and deal on the delegate game to get that number. If he doesn’t like it he can endorse Ted Cruz and be Ted’s VP now so he doesn’t get his feelings hurt later.


40 posted on 03/20/2016 2:43:57 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson