And put Glenn Beck and Mark Levin at the top of that list. This chick should lose her CNN gig for her brown shirt tactics. Normally I give her a Not Guilty but not this time.
Guilty
Posted on 03/18/2016 11:48:18 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Blacklisted: Drudge, Coulter, Hannity, Carson, Breitbart, O’Reilly, Christie Make GOP Smart Set’s List of ‘Ideological Hustlers’
Conservative movement professionals in Washington, D.C. are plotting to form a “blacklist” of Donald Trump supporters that they can kick out of the movement, never to return.
Several conservative talking heads and Beltway consultant types have been very angry about the rise of businessman Trump, who is pushing for American sovereignty, a reversal of neoconservative foreign policy, and competitive bidding for pharmaceuticals even though the drug companies that fund the Republican Party would take a financial hit.
So far, anti-Trump think pieces referencing William F. Buckley have been ineffective. Memes comparing Trump to Hitler haven’t worked. So these Republicans are getting more Nixon-y. They’re coming out with an Enemies List.
CNN contributor and former Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) spokeswoman Amanda Carpenter volunteered to take the lead in writing the list.
Has anyone compiled the definitive list of conservatives who should be blackballed for supporting Trump? I will if it doesn't exist.
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) March 16, 2016
But Carpenter, who once got called an “idiot” by Donald Trump, did not mention that she formerly defended Trump on numerous occasions. Luckily, savvy Twitter users pointed it out for her in the responses below her tweet.
Carpenter later explained the terms for inclusion on her “blacklist.”
My blacklist is limited to people who have formally endorsed Trump. Not those who simply explain the phenomenon. https://t.co/KrbutWYesO
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) March 17, 2016
Carpenter is not alone in calling for a blacklist. Red State contributing editor Ben Howe said that he has the resources to get a high-tech “blacklist” off the ground, as well as seed money from God knows who in the donor class.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Just replying to your anonymous trash-talk, and noting that you PRETEND that you're going to hold your nose and vote for Trump if it comes to it - but your Trump-bashing posts on this thread clearly show you mean to do no such thing.
You must be some sort of Very Special Snowflake who thinks that another freeper rebutting his obnoxious gasbag posts on a SINGLE Free Republic thread is "stalking" him...
Maybe you should show us all ANOTHER thread where I followed you and "stalked you" over this current thread.
Post it up, VSS. LOL! :)
“...I followed you and “stalked you”...”
Exactly! And that’s *TWO* more replies to the same post where I have you so unhinged you are stalking me! Amazing, how little is required to take up full-time residence in the immature head of a trump-pet!! LOL!
I’ll bet you are checking your pings every 5 minutes to see if you need to jump after I yank your chain! Heh!
But an analysis of your Trump-bashing posts on this thread [the only thread I've exchanged posts with you, BTW, contrary to your fake "stalking" charges] shows that you mean to do as much damage to Trump the candidate on Free Republic as you can, while pretending you'll vote for him if he gains the nomination.
Don't post to me, or about me, any more. I'll have to report you to the mods for ACTUAL stalking, if you do.
What you are talking about is irrelevant. We don’t have a progressive or an elitist running against Trump. We have a constitutional conservative (Cruz) running against a non-ideologue, anti-establishment populist (Trump). I choose not to vote for someone who has not proven himself to be conservative and who in fact has proven himself financially supportive of liberals. I’m not going to put my reliance on a candidate who has shown himself to be so inconsistent and unprincipled it would be like putting my money on black on the roulette wheel. Being against the establishment is not enough. Only candidates that are reliable on conservative issues get my vote. Relying on Trump is no better than Romney on testosterone. If you wouldn’t vote for Romney for being a RINO, you shouldn’t vote for Trump, because that’s exactly what he is.
And put Glenn Beck and Mark Levin at the top of that list. This chick should lose her CNN gig for her brown shirt tactics. Normally I give her a Not Guilty but not this time.
Guilty
“What you are talking about is irrelevant.”
Well you’re the one who brought up the topic of populism, not me.
“...Don’t post to me, or about me, any more. I’ll have to report you to the mods for ACTUAL stalking, if you do...”
Then simply stop stalking me AND replying to me and you won’t hear from me again, cupcake.
Look, I realize you have “issues” and that I have unhinged you to where you can’t control yourself, but your posting history reveals who the stalker is. It’s *you* cupcake! It is YOU who slings the personal attacks. It is *YOU* who replies to my posts. You can’t scrub your posting history either! At least quit whining to me because you can’t control yourself.
One more time, stop stalking me; stop replying to me and you won’t hear from me again, cupcake. We clear?
Knock it off.
Forgive the run on sentence, but that is the almost certain reality so far as Hillary is concerned.
“...when a committee of Bill Clinton’s loyalest supporters will call on her and carefully but firmly demand that she face reality, to protect the Clinton legacy, etc...”
Well, we can hope.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.