Posted on 03/16/2016 5:47:11 PM PDT by SkyPilot
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. – White lives do not matter, according to a student debater/activist from the University of West Georgia.
Miguel Feliciano, along with fellow West Georgia student Damiyr Davis, reportedly participated in a recent debate with other students at Harvard University.
During an exchange with their opponents, Feliciano suggested that white people should kill themselves because of their “white privilege.”
The exchange was caught on video and posted on YouTube. “White life is wrong,” Feliciano was quoted as saying by Infowars.com. “Our argument is that we should never affirm white life. White life is based off black subjugation.”
When a white debater asked Feliciano whether he should commit suicide, Feliciano said “I don’t see why not, it’s ethical.”
When the white debater suggested that it might be better to remain alive and fight the social forces that promote “white privilege,” Feliciano rejects the notion.
“Struggling against the structure means putting yourself on the line, putting your body on the line, do it. Affirmative suicide, that’s cool, it’s one little step in the right direction,” Feliciano said, according to Infowars.com.
Ironically, the debate topic was supposed to be about renewable energy.
“The black debaters simply ‘chose’ to point out their opponents’ skin color and begin advocating genocide,” reported InvestmentWatchdogBlog.com. “They expressly stated that these were their ‘sincere beliefs,’ not just an argument to win a debate.”
Feliciano and Davis are not some anonymous student crackpots posing as serious debaters.
They form a respected two-person debate team that took second place at the 2013 Cross-Examination Debate Association Nationals, according to Infowars.com.
(Excerpt) Read more at eagnews.org ...
Everyone should kill themselves immediately...end human prvilege!!!
I say yes, most of the student body and professors should kill themselves
“If what you say is true, that this is how minorities debate today, and they’re allowed to get away with it, it’s the fault of 1) their debate opponents, and 2) the judging (which may not be to the same standard of yesteryear, either.)”
Here is a link to an article about contemporary debating.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/how-to-speak-gibberish-win-a-national-debate-title/
Go back to Africa and tell us how better you have it then.
Very interesting. Clearly the standards of content and dress have declined. But I still would have had the head of anybody (rhetorically speaking) who brought the subject of race into a debate topic that dealt with something else entirely.
bump... thanks for that link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.