Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama says 'dangers are real' in debate over encryption (Sides with the FBI)
Yahoo Finance ^ | March 12, 2016 | By DARLENE SUPERVILLE

Posted on 03/12/2016 9:30:03 PM PST by Swordmaker

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — President Barack Obama sided with law enforcement Friday in the debate pitting encryption and personal privacy against national security, arguing that authorities must be able to access data held on electronic devices because the "dangers are real."

Appearing at an annual tech festival in the Texas capital, Obama delivered his most extensive comments to date on an issue currently being played out in federal court. Apple, one of the world's largest technology companies, is challenging the government's request that it help the FBI access data on a cellphone that was used in the San Bernardino, California, attack that killed 14 people.

The issue has roiled the tech industry and divided Obama's advisers, but the president appeared to side Friday with law enforcement despite also saying the matter would not be settled by adopting an "absolutist view."

Obama restated his commitment to strong encryption but also raised the question of how would authorities catch child pornographers or disrupt terrorist plots if smartphones and other electronic devices are designed in ways that keep the data on them locked away forever.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apple; applepinglist; fbi; obama; tyranny; tyrant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: OldArmy52

he also mentioned it being used in IRS tax cases.


21 posted on 03/12/2016 10:53:45 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble mined asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

Who he?


22 posted on 03/12/2016 11:09:55 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Obama the guy with appointees who can’t take care of sensitive documents and information


23 posted on 03/12/2016 11:11:11 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (GOPe/MSM - "When we want your opinion, we will give it to you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

trump is bright but not brilliant.


24 posted on 03/12/2016 11:24:45 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
Yes, the dangers of a fascist government are very, very real.

You have been living under one for over 7 years or haven't you noticed?

25 posted on 03/12/2016 11:47:30 PM PST by itsahoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
It would be a hard sell to ban hard encryption itself so they figure they will just make all the hardware insecure and screw us over that way.

The primary reason the feds want this!!! They want Apple to not have hard encryption, so no company will have hard encryption.

All devices will be compromised. I side with Apple on this one. The feds don't want to stop terrorists, hell they're escorting them into our country and funding them, all at the same time they try to destroy patriots.

26 posted on 03/12/2016 11:47:56 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Our feckless leader, The Master of Disaster, the Ayatollah of All Crapola..


27 posted on 03/13/2016 12:28:45 AM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Said the grad without grades.


28 posted on 03/13/2016 1:43:27 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

the guy that had every record since his birth sealed is claiming there are real dangers without full access to all everyone’s personal information?

that’s pretty funny.

and in typical libtard fashion... he cannot spot the irony


29 posted on 03/13/2016 1:55:38 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

You know, no issue is truly fully-understood, until one hears the wit, wisdom and logic, of Barack Hussein Obama.

So he can’t scoop ice cream. So what ... he’s a genius.

Thank you Kenya and Indonesia for this gift that keeps on giving the whole year ‘round.

And thank you, liberals, DNC, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. Only you could bring this light that shines down from somewhere.


30 posted on 03/13/2016 3:13:01 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

I think you’re on to something there. They have nothing to gain by admitting they can break into any device. Much more to gain by making us believe we have a place to hide. Win Win by both Apple and the Feds. Apple continues to sell based on that point and the Federales can show some proof that they didn’t do anything illegal because they couldn’t. I hate being that cynical but there it is.


31 posted on 03/13/2016 4:15:58 AM PDT by EandH Dad (sleeping giants wake up REALLY grumpy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
I suspect they want to convince people that certain devices are secure

True, and they do a good job of it to the point where they require it under various laws. One example: http://netlib.com/compliance/ of many. Granted it's not in a phone used by stupid terrorists, but it probably has no back doors except where specified (e.g. device management interfaces)

32 posted on 03/13/2016 5:25:07 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EandH Dad

See link in my previous post. Not likely to have unknown back doors, especially considering the wide variety of vendors that would have to be compromised or in collusion with the government.


33 posted on 03/13/2016 5:26:48 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

The government is not doing this to pursue terrorists, the government is afraid somebody, somewhere, might be able to make a purchase or financial transaction without their knowledge or ability to take a cut


34 posted on 03/13/2016 6:34:50 AM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
" The dangers are real but you continue to let people stroll on in with no vetting process."

Those aren't the real dangers. There is hardly a single person in the 0b0z0 regime who could pass the same OSI background investigation for the TOP SECRET security clearance -- that I did.

And, for sure, that includes 0b0z0 himself -- and Hildabeast Clinton and her paramour, Humma whatzhername...

35 posted on 03/13/2016 9:02:02 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah: Satan's current alias. "Obama": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson