Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Source: Clinton IT specialist revealing server details to FBI, 'devastating witness'
Fox News ^ | 3/11/2016 | Catherine Herridge

Posted on 03/11/2016 10:28:32 AM PST by SueRae

Former Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, a key witness in the email probe who struck an immunity deal with the Justice Department, has told the FBI a range of details about how her personal email system was set up, according to an intelligence source close to the case who called him a “devastating witness.”

The source said Pagliano told the FBI who had access to the former secretary of state’s system – as well as when – and what devices were used, amounting to a roadmap for investigators.

"Bryan Pagliano is a devastating witness and, as the webmaster, knows exactly who had access to [Clinton's] computer and devices at specific times. His importance to this case cannot be over-emphasized," the intelligence source said.

The source, who is not authorized to speak on the record due to the sensitivity of the ongoing investigation, said Pagliano has provided information allowing investigators to knit together the emails with other evidence, including images of Clinton on the road as secretary of state.

The cross-referencing of evidence could help investigators pinpoint potential gaps in the email record. "Don't forget all those photos with her using various devices and it is easy to track the whereabouts of her phone," the source said. "It is still boils down to a paper case. Did you email at this time from your home or elsewhere using this device? And here is a picture of you and your aides holding the devices."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonprobe; fbi; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemail; hillaryemailgaps; immunitydeal; nongovemails; pagliano; pleadeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
"Classification is based on content, not markings."
1 posted on 03/11/2016 10:28:32 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SueRae

IT guys know all.


2 posted on 03/11/2016 10:30:00 AM PST by fulltlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The importance of this story is NOT in the information it provides about Clinton, which should be harmful to her; rather it is the fact that sources high in the FBI are happily leaking it. They’re putting down a marker....either Clinton gets indicted, or the whole story gets leaked...creating a huge problem for the DoJ


3 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:26 AM PST by ken5050 (Trump: "I'm no conservative, but I sure can play one on TV")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

After a thorough investigation the Obama “Justice” Department will clear Hillary of all allegations and attribute it all to a vast right wing conspiracy attempting to smear her good name.

Seriously, does anyone think that Hillary Clinton will get prosecuted when Lois Lerner was not?


4 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:34 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt
Don't get too excited. Vince Foster is still waiting.


5 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:34 AM PST by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

...His importance to this case cannot be over-emphasized,...

Pretty damaging statement.


6 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:38 AM PST by WILLIALAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

7 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:39 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (So our choice will be either Trump or Clinton? I need a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

I’m sorry, I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t believe that that lying criminal Shillary is ever going to be prosecuted. They’ve had at least 20 years of various criminal acts upon which to put her azz under the jail, but here she is running for president.


8 posted on 03/11/2016 10:32:51 AM PST by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

And loretta “lala” lynch will prolly take no action regardless of how many beans this guy spills. Now, if you are a climate ‘denier’ you may be in trouble with the doj.


9 posted on 03/11/2016 10:33:24 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Didn’t someone come out from the Justice Department and say Clinton was cleared. I thought I saw something like that this week.


10 posted on 03/11/2016 10:34:17 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
...according to an intelligence source close to the case...

Who might perhaps be a Clinton operative. I seem to remember "sources close to the Starr investigation" suggesting all sorts of devastating things were coming, and that helped make Bill look relatively innocent when the actual charges were revealed.

11 posted on 03/11/2016 10:36:15 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Bryan Pagliano.

There’s one guy I wouldn’t want to be right now.

He will sleep with one eye open the rest of his life and never be able to have a cat.


12 posted on 03/11/2016 10:36:19 AM PST by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Wasn/t the DOJ——one of the Castro brothers said it.

They’re sucking up to Hillary so she/ll pick a castro as VP.


13 posted on 03/11/2016 10:37:42 AM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

No joke. I was thinking the same thing. It’s likely harder to hide from them than it is the Mob.


14 posted on 03/11/2016 10:39:03 AM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

When my brother and I joined the USAF in 1962, one of the questions on the enlistment form was “Have you ever been employed by a foreign government”.
Because at the time I worked for Trans-Canada Airlines (now Air Canada) at Cleveland Hopkins AP and TCA was owned by the Canadian government, I answered in the affirmative.
The next day, I was called back to the Cleveland induction center and escorted to a room where two government “suits” politely questioned me for about an hour. Later reflecting on their questions, it was clear that each was designed to determine my sentiments about and loyalty to this country.
Apparently satisfied with my “interview”, I was tapped to be the Group Leader and charged with getting 60 guys and their records to the airport, on the flight to Houston and Lackland AFB to begin Basic.
I went on to be given a Top Secret Clearance in the photomapping and analysis section at The Corps of Engineers School outside DC. I can say now that we saw more than a few fresh aerial photos of Cuba, Vietnam and other potential 1960s hotspots.
Had I disclosed ANY of that information, I would probably still be in prison.
Why is Hillary STILL AT LARGE??????


15 posted on 03/11/2016 10:40:21 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt
> IT guys know all.

And still nothing will happen to her because of the rampant corruption in DC. Here's how the MSM will portray her until after the election:


16 posted on 03/11/2016 10:40:37 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
mrsmel said: "They’ve had at least 20 years of various criminal acts ..."

While that is true, it is also true that Hillary is aging and has become less powerful and more careless.

John Gotti was known as the "Teflon Don" for a reason, but that didn't stop him from dying in prison. I'm sure there are younger, more ambitious followers in Hillary's circle who would not miss her.

17 posted on 03/11/2016 10:41:48 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

This guy better move out of the country on an assumed name.


18 posted on 03/11/2016 10:44:54 AM PST by wastedyears (uchikudake - toki michite - ikiru tame - tokihanate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
“Didn’t someone come out from the Justice Department and say Clinton was cleared. I thought I saw something like that this week.”

Yes, one of those dopey Texan Castro Dems said that on a Sunday morning show. But he wasn't leaking inside info; we was revealing himself to be an ignoramous.

19 posted on 03/11/2016 10:47:18 AM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

I would be very, very happy to be wrong.


20 posted on 03/11/2016 10:48:17 AM PST by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson