Posted on 03/04/2016 12:20:53 PM PST by Steelfish
In New Fox Poll, Trump Loses Against Hillary, Comes in Last Among GOP Candidates
Michael Cantrell March 1, 2016 1 I don’t recall seeing an election cycle this brutal and divisive — thanks in large part to the passions stirred up from eight years of Obama and an angry electorate — as people who once aligned with one another are now at each other’s throats over who the GOP candidate should be.
While there’s lots of good arguments being made for most candidates — except Kasich because there’s absolutely no good reason that guy should be leading anything — what it all boils down to is whether or not our candidate can beat Hillary.
Well, here’s a a Fox News poll that shows how each candidate matches up against Queen Bee.
Look where Trump finishes. Ouch.
(GRAPH) Despite what Trump and others continue to tells us over and over again, if this poll is accurate — always something we should take with a grain of salt — he doesn’t fare very well against Hillary. At al
(Excerpt) Read more at youngcons.com ...
I don’t believe their stupid poll for one minute. Any of the candidates running could beat Hillary Clinton.
You AND me. It would be the hours of standing that would do me in. Not a spring chicken anymore, but I am amazed at the cross slice of Americans who one sees at the rallys. Young, old, and all demographics. With Trump we would have an ALL-AMERICAN president again. Wouldn’t that be beautiful?
i will never watch fox news again
Was the poll commissioned by romney?
Polls are only believable by Trumpettes if Trump is leading. Even RCP which shows the same poor Trump performance vs Hillary and even worse against Bernie is discounted.
Gut Feel “Trumps” math. We are living in never-never land.
Roger Ailes and entire staff of Fox News voting.
The Iranian hostage crisis and Carter’s inability to deal with it was a big reason why Carter’s poll numbers steadily declined and Reagan’s rose. That story led the nightly news every day for months and months.
Trump has no such circumstance to work in his favor. People who point to the 1980 poll numbers as a comparison to 2016 are totally misguided.
BFD
Bulls&*#
Oh wait....what's that you say? This article is from 6/16/15? Right you are! But it's a good example of what a difference a little bit of time can make in the actual outcome.
“Registered voters” - always unreliable.
Gee a dope of more than 5 points in a few days why HOW could THAT happen hmmm?
When I see Hillary losing to everyone EXCEPT Trump, I see “global warming science.”
I know. Many of the Trump fanboy club won’t watch Fox, read National Review, Charles Krauthammer, Thomas Sowell, George Will... The list goes on and on. So I’ve been pushing for a safe space on FR the fanboy snowflakes will do fine
It would be "no such circumstance" if Romney or any other member of the GOPe, including Cruz, was running against Hillary, but I can think of at least a couple of events that could blow up in Hillary's face just like the Iran hostage situation. Let her worry about which of the multitude of situations she's involved with and she knows could be trouble, that Trump can use against her. He probably knows more than we do. But unlike the GOPee, he's not going to sit on his hands and let her waltz in.
Almost every other poll says the same thing, even the one he quoted to Cruz last night.
There’s no way Kasich beats Hillary. Most people don’t even know who he is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.