Posted on 03/01/2016 5:05:59 PM PST by Maceman
Former top Ted Cruz adviser Rick Tyler says conservatives wont stop making their case against the likely nominee.
The big, set-piece battle of the Republican primary is very nearly over but the guerilla war against Donald Trump may have just begun.
Trump is poised to seize the Republican nomination today if the Super Tuesday polls prove predictive but the spirits of the candidates hes brutalized, ridiculed and (nearly) beaten are likely to haunt and harass him for the next eight months.
And Ted Cruz clinging to hopes that a win in home-state Texas would forestall an Alamo moment represents the greatest latent threat for Trump, who has seen a steady stream of Ill-never-vote-for-him pronouncements over the last week. Some of those defections (former RNC Chairman Mel Martinez, to name one) have come from the partys establishment wing. But Trump faces a far, far bigger threat if the right revolts and the declaration by conservative Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse last weekend was an ominous one, auguring a possible (but not inevitable) second front against Trump.
Cruz isnt likely to follow Sasse if he withdraws from the race, but hes already proven himself to be the Che Guevara of the tea party movement. He turned on the GOP establishment in the Senate, whipped up House Republicans to rebel against former House Speaker John Boehner, and shut down the government over Obamacare. Cruz owes his brand to RINO hunting. He doesnt like Trump despite their early-campaign flirtation and will like Trump a lot less if he inches toward the center in a general election.
Enter Rick Tyler, a veteran conservative strategist who was, until recently, Cruzs communications director. I sat down with Tyler for POLITICOs Off Message podcast over the weekend and heard a message that should take some of the fizz from The Donalds bubbly: Hard-core conservative Republicans may not oppose him publicly, but they could silently undermine his candidacy and many of the partys big-money donors, especially pro-Israel heavyweights like Sheldon Adelson, could take a far lesser role in Hillary-bashing than they might have otherwise.
I think that Hillary Clinton will hammer [Trump] and expose him for what he is And if I had to bet, I would say that Hillary Clinton would beat Donald Trump, said Tyler, who was defenestrated by Cruz last month after he retweeted an inaccurate story about Marco Rubio allegedly demeaning the Bible. The parting was amicable. And the dismissal of Tyler, who worked for Newt Gingrichs super PAC in 2012, was widely viewed a PR move: Rubio, Trump and Ben Carson had been criticizing the Texas senator for what they deemed dirty tricks, and somebody had to be the sacrificial lamb.
Cruz signed a pledge, like every other Republican to support the eventual nominee but they didnt say how much, Tyler reminded me.
When I asked Tyler if his ex-boss would back Trump with force, he replied, Not much because because, you know, Donald Trump runs around and calls Ted Cruz a liar Thats very personal.
When I asked him how serious a problem tea party hostility would be for Trump, he said: Oh, its very significant.
Tyler outlines the case against Trump from the right a case Cruz and others are likely to pursue even while supporting their nominee: If you care about gun rights, having Donald Trump be aligned with Michael Bloomberg would be an anathema he has been quoted as saying, I don't like guns. He has been quoted as saying, I support the assault weapons ban. And that's true on abortion, partial-birth abortion, gays in the military, homosexual marriage. You know, hes gone hes supported TARP. Hes supported I mean, its on and on and on. I mean, this guy has a contradictory statement for everything he now proclaims and professes to be.
It seems unlikely that Cruz or Rubio or Bush or Carson or John Kasich will actively oppose Trump as nominee their allegiance to the Republican Party is stronger than Trumps. But they could sap his strength by sniping at him, issue-by-issue from the wings.
Tyler raised the specter of 2012, when eventual nominee Mitt Romney whom many on the right viewed as an establishment sell-out savaged Gingrich after the former speaker took the South Carolina primary.
I am sorry to say that our party is going to engage in the politics of personal destruction and that were going to call each other names and not talk its very Alinskyite to me, said Tyler, who remains in close touch with Cruzs team. You know: Pick a target, freeze it, focus on it, and destroy it. You know, that seems to be how Donald Trump and now, to some extent, Marco Rubio has decided to run their campaigns. I think thats a bad I think thats a bad omen for the future of the party.
And theres another factor: Its not clear how enthusiastically the big GOP super PACs will support Trump; Tylers Gingrich-backing PAC was buoyed by cash from pro-Israel billionaire Sheldon Adelson. Tyler thinks Trumps recent off-the-cuff comment that he was neutral in the Israel-Palestinian standoff was a major error. Could Adelson sit 2016 out?
Former Ted Cruz campaign official Rick Tyler says Donald Trump's bruising tactics may earn him the GOP nomination but could haunt him with Republicans for the rest of election season.
I think its certainly possible, he said. I mean, because, on the one hand, you have Donald Trump who just doesnt even doesn't seem to understand the Middle East and its problems and how to move forward with it
Tyler, who signed up with MSNBC a couple of days after he was dismissed, looks pretty good for a guy who has just seen the bottom of his own campaign bus. The crime: Tweeting a false report alleging that Rubio had made a disparaging remark about the Bible in the presence of Cruzs evangelist father.
I talked a bit about the kerfuffle with Tyler (he says his boss is squeaky clean) during our 45-minute interview and he expressed contrition. I posted it, and it was poor judgment to post it, he said. The reason it was is because it was going to be blown up as, you know, I was criticizing Marco for not being a Bible-believing Christian. I never believed that. Of course, I still believe that he is. I took it as more of Marco was being you know, it was teasing.
He rejected, out of hand, my suggestion that he was a sacrificial flack thrown over so Cruz could arrest the Tricky Teddy narrative. Yet he was candid, even a tad gloomy, about Cruzs path to the nomination with Trump blocking the road.
Yeah, its narrow, Tyler told me.
Ted if Ted wins Texas and wins some substantial portion of the delegates, he will have a mass of delegates, he explained, laying out a complicated, and in Tylers view, somewhat unlikely scenario. He will have then had two wins. Rubio will if Rubio doesn't win any on Tuesday and then goes on to lose his home state of Florida, which right now he would, it should be game over for him. Then maybe, then maybe theres an outside chance we get a consolidation around Ted Cruz, and he could either accumulate enough delegates to get to the convention or at least stop Trump from accumulating enough delegates to get to the convention.
Tyler, like almost every other operative gunning for Trump, is still scratching his head over the developers unprecedented, rapid rise. But he defends the campaigns decision to play Eddie Haskell nice with Trump early on, telling me that Cruz needed to use those opening months to establish name recognition and create a likeable image in the minds of voters. And that my point here, not his hasnt always been an easy task for Cruz, who has a far greater gift for combat than cuddling.
First, they have to know your name, right? Tyler adds. Second
they have to like you. And then the final is the contrast phase. And if you skip around those steps, it doesnt really work.
They will, if trump,worshipers think Tea Party doesn’t want trump.
WOW! WELCOME ABOARD, cba123.
#NeverTrump
The threat of the Never Trump voters - one out of every five Republicans - is a reminder that political coalitions tend to be zero sum: reach for a new group of voters and you risk losing a group of older ones.
Its some of the candidates. Not the tea party. Unfortunately, a number of tea party candidates reneged on campaign promises. Or, just sided with liberals such as the gang of eight.
If Cruz can get the truth about trump.........good
If so, then they are playing right into the hands of the RINO Establishment. They would rather have Hillary than Trump...and to Hell with the country (which is to say, US).
No thanks, I won’t help or gratify them. Even Cruz says that he will support the nominee.
The real TEA Party is behind Trump. These are the phony TEA Party “leaders” who came in after the fact and pretended they spoke for us. Now they plan on helping Hillary.
Reality? What is it?
He has never ever been outside the DC beltway or left the radical left media circuit.
Glenn just spits out the latest Soros talking points at Leftico.
A rekative met him and called him
a certified lying Soros sociopath.
No, he doesn't. Trump is a big government progressive.
That has the ring of truth.
It will be interesting to read the reactions here from the Cruz and Rubio supporters. Regardless, if Cruz and Rubio try scorched earth on Trump and break that oath, Trump will burn them unmercifully.
Tyler has strong reputation as a werewolf operator...
...but he got caught before sun up
“No but there will be some psuedo Tea Party fund raising scams that will.”
You have that correct.
No, because TEA is a movement of financial discipline above all else. A lot others are glomming onto it with every social idea they can find. But TEA meant TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY. Remember the guy in the trading floor yelling “stop spending, stop spending, stop spending!!”
TEA should have no problem with Trump.
Exactly. Looks like the enemedia got a head start.
The subversives who say they are tea party will.
The Tea Party is all in for Trump here in Georgia.At least in my area.
Hear,Hear!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.