Posted on 02/29/2016 2:26:51 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
Like the "Hands Up" MYTH and LIE, here it is again.
In his own words: HERE
I feel like I’m in the twilight zone.
It is unreal how people have been blinded by the color orange.
What Duke said about Rubio and Cruz was 100% right. Both were for AMNESTY!!
Anybody but a liberal would agree with Trump’s plan to stop the mass flow of Muslims into the country and anybody but a liberal would disagree with a wall. Cruz and Rubio have now called for the exact same policies as Trump, when both of them blasted him two months ago for both policies.
This story was ginned up by somebody who saw that blacks are also attending Trump's rallies, and I don't mean the stupid BLM folks.
Duke did not endorse and Trump had previously disavowed him, yet the media is trying to turn Trump into being the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan.
The media have no shame.
Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan both agreed with and supported Obama for President.
Why is it that it's only REPUBLICANS that have to worry about WHO endorses them?
I wonder how much the Left funnels to Duke, so that he can stay in business and embarass the candidate of their choosing by professing support?
... AND????
Go to RAT camp my friend! They will appreciate your sentiments with open arms!
YES. He DOES NOT need to release his TAXES.
Who the hell cares? For what purpose?
The only CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS to run for President (besides state election filings)....
1. NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
2. 35 YRS OF AGE
3. 14 YEARS CURRENT U.S. RESIDENT
Where is the “TAX RETURN” requirement????????
My ears are ringing from you yelling so loud.
I don't care who votes for Trump or if he accepts their vote or not.
My post was to show that Trump is a big liar. In 2000 he knew full well who Donald Duke was, but a couple of days ago the said he didn't know who he was. That is a Lie.
The current MSM is the enemy of freedom and truth.
The great thing about Trump is he doesn’t kowtow and kiss the ring of the racist media. He plays offense not defense.
hey if you’re a Christian, anti LGBT agenda, want muslim immigrants vetted, are catholic or want secure borders...
you may be on the ADL list of GROUPS...
CNN used the endorsement lie as a set up and then CNN used the followup interview and vague references to “groups” which includes those above....and mentioned Duke, the KKK and “groups”...
Now by sunday one would have to assume the lie was known by CNN so why the followup by CNN..?? because its a SMEAR CAMPAIGN MANUFACTURED BY THE LIBTARD MEDIA..... lie lie lie llie and the uninformed might believe it....
Plus there was another trap.... if trump said he was aagisnt the “groups” it wooudl include the lgitimate political opponents of the anti Constitutional regime...Christians, anti LGBT agenda, want muslim immigrants vetted, are catholic or want secure borders... and trump woud ahve dug himself deeper into a trap...
TRUMP SENSED A SETUP AND WAS THEREFOR VAGUE SINCE THE PRESENTATION WAS NOT CLEAR AND WAS CONTINUATION OF A LIE DONE KNOWINGLY BY CNN...ESPECIALLY IN VEWI OF HIS FRIDAY REPUDIATION...
nice try CNN...
Diamond and Silk thoughts about David Duke, The Democrats and The kkk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR93wQm-YDk
The problem with all that is that most (not all) the replacements go to Washington and promptly turn to mush. My own Rep. is a perfect example. It’s like they walk in and some GOPe Jedi-turned-dark-side does the mind control thing on them. He (my Rep.) was a real firebrand in our State Legislature; in DC, he votes GOPe every friggin’ time.
Solution is of course a single strong man who will not be corrupted by power but a paragon of virtue and beyond reproach. I am most happy that our founding fathers did not believe that way instead set up a system of distributed powers that would be balanced against each other but I’m quite sure that everyone here who supports the strong man knows far better than Adams or Jefferson or Franklin or Madison.
My post was to show that Trump is a big liar. In 2000 he knew full well who Donald Duke was, but a couple of days ago the said he didn’t know who he was. That is a Lie.
Go back and look at what Trump said. He said I don’t know david duke. There is a huge difference between that and I don’t know who he is?
A “disclaimer” first: I am leaning toward but not “committed” to Trump, and have Cruz as my #2, though Cruz’ campaign is weakening that latter, with me.
You are making it an either-or. Not to mention putting words in my mouth. Can you imagine the US going into WW2 with an Obama as President, and the current crop of (mostly) useless-or-worse dolts in Congress? We’d probably all be speaking German or Japanese, today. (No knock against Germans in general, as I am of partially German background myself.)
The situation today is much different, but just as dangerous as it was in Dec., 1941. Electing a strong President with a conservative bent and the will to fight the Establishment is a must. I wish we had another Reagan, or a conservative version of FDR, but we don’t, so we’ll probably have to settle for a strong-willed but admittedly erratic guy who at least is not controlled by his donors. The checks and balances you rightfully quote are still in place, not that I have much faith in Congress, but if things get too far out of hand, we boot the new Pres. out in 2020.
Now, if you think Trump would be a Putin or worse, then you are entitled to that opinion, but most of us here on FR just don’t see it that way, and none of us would support anyone who seriously appeared to be such.
IMO, the bigger threat is that even an independent (from the donors) & strong President cannot defeat the Establishment / Bureaucracy. Virtually no one is talking about what’s going on in the 2016 Congressional and lower races, which is a shame, and a potential huge problem.
Is there a risk that a strong President advocating a break from our present path would go awry? Yes. But, the thing is, it’s a lot lower risk to the country than continuing on more or less as we are.
One last thing: The former risk would be a lot easier for me to evaluate if somebody would actually ask Trump substantive questions.
I’m likely to be offline for a day or 2, so, I’ll have to leave it at that. Thanks for the civil discussion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.