Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/29/2016 8:51:16 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox

Ping


2 posted on 02/29/2016 8:51:44 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think just as important, it is about who the President appoints as Fed Governors.

No on has asked the question if Yellen would be given another term, or would she be replaced. And what is the basis for his potential appointments to the Board of Gov. of the Federal Reserve?


3 posted on 02/29/2016 8:53:13 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

2016 is all about Borders.


6 posted on 02/29/2016 9:00:24 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No 2016 is about deciding if America will be made up of Americans or not.


7 posted on 02/29/2016 9:00:43 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Just wondering whether Scalia's heretofore-unpublished votes are binding under Court rules, or whether they become moot and are disregarded, unless he actually produced a written opinion or dissent. After all, until the opinion is published, he could have changed his vote.

Does anyone here actually know?

9 posted on 02/29/2016 9:03:14 AM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I thought it was about the WALL ?


10 posted on 02/29/2016 9:05:37 AM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is true, but an emphasis on SCOTUS does not help us. We need as much apathy as possible among the baby-killers and parasites on the loony left. SCOTUS, as an issue, might bring them to the polls even if they are indifferent to their treasonous nominee.


11 posted on 02/29/2016 9:08:35 AM PST by Pollster1 ("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Very good article, but bad title.


12 posted on 02/29/2016 9:09:16 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And if Trump does end up winning, I do hope he appoints Ted Cruz.


13 posted on 02/29/2016 9:16:49 AM PST by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A logical corollary to Blackwell’s point is that the GOP must retain the Senate. But apparently, advocating that the GOP retain the Senate is contrary to the agendas of some around here....


14 posted on 02/29/2016 9:18:37 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

In my mind this coming election is all about immigration, just as it will be for every upcoming election in the Developed World. Trump is the only candidate who expresses the view of the vast majority of American voters that immigration must be controlled and borders secured if we are to protect our homes and families. I don’t know anybody who doesn’t think personal security is a top priority. The attack on Pearl Harbor was the single, most important factor uniting a deeply divided American public to enter World War II. Unfortunately the passage of time has dulled the memories of this generation that a very similar event happened on September 11, 2001.


15 posted on 02/29/2016 9:19:35 AM PST by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I have been yelling this for the past two years.

Even if the Senate Republicans somehow find the minimal balls necessary to block Obama's far left-wing liberal replacement for Scalia, there are still three Justices left on the Court who will be over 80 years old next year. The next President will determine the direction of the Supreme Court for the next 30 years

The Constitution now says whatever the hell 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices want it to say. Either we will have a far left-wing oligarchy of Justices legislating from the bench for another generation or we will not. This election will decide.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

20 posted on 02/29/2016 9:30:56 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good article. Ken Blackwell appears to be resisting infection with Trump Derangement Syndrome.


21 posted on 02/29/2016 9:34:43 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Has there ever NOT been a clarion call to the voting booth? If it’s not the ‘end times’ in one fashion or the other: SCOTUS, roll-back of XYZ, or...

Course, I’ve not seen anything BUT a continual shift to the Socialist Left in my 25yrs of voting age, so I’m not exactly sure where, let alone IF, those brakes will kick-in.


24 posted on 02/29/2016 9:44:44 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No it’s not “all about SCOTUS”.

SCOTUS always has the same importance as a vacancy can open on any given day.

Other issues rise and fall in importance, but SCOTUS is a constant.


27 posted on 02/29/2016 10:11:42 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Trump and/or Cruz, it's all good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is one of the many reasons why I believe that all the ‘conservatives’ who are claiming that they won’t support Trump will eventually come around to vote for him. There is simply too much at stake.


28 posted on 02/29/2016 10:14:00 AM PST by No Dems 2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
<>If justices can act like a continuing constitutional convention in which five men and women can transform settled law on whim, we have passed from the rule of law to the rule of men.<>

There are two powers above Scotus.

God Himself.

We the People.

It is way past time to trim the wings of a morally twisted Scotus. Article V is right in front of our noses.

37 posted on 02/29/2016 12:05:28 PM PST by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Didn’t John Roberts’ betrayal on Obamacare destroy the argument that we need a GOPe president for SCOTUS appointments.

If you don’t know by now that there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the Rats and the GOPe, you are either part of the GOPe scumbags or you’re just plain stupid.


38 posted on 02/29/2016 12:11:28 PM PST by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson