Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 2016 Election Is All About SCOTUS!
Townhall.com ^ | February 29, 2016 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 02/29/2016 8:51:16 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Kaslin

Good article. Ken Blackwell appears to be resisting infection with Trump Derangement Syndrome.


21 posted on 02/29/2016 9:34:43 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
A logical corollary to Blackwell’s point is that the GOP must retain the Senate.

Even a truly Conservative President will not be able to get much done if Chuck Schumer is Senate Majority Leader.

The Republicans (RINOs and all) need to hold onto the Senate for at least the next two years. The President and the Congress would then have two years to undo the last 8 years of Obamanation. Any RINOs that refuse to support the President and help roll over the Democrats would be at the top of the list for replacement in the 2018 and 2012 primaries.

22 posted on 02/29/2016 9:35:53 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yep, we all know *everything* passed by Congress is just hunky-dory. Maybe, even ‘blesses’ by SCOTUS as legal...

/s - just in case.


23 posted on 02/29/2016 9:42:16 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Has there ever NOT been a clarion call to the voting booth? If it’s not the ‘end times’ in one fashion or the other: SCOTUS, roll-back of XYZ, or...

Course, I’ve not seen anything BUT a continual shift to the Socialist Left in my 25yrs of voting age, so I’m not exactly sure where, let alone IF, those brakes will kick-in.


24 posted on 02/29/2016 9:44:44 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
I agree 100%. But I've literally been called a Democratic plant for Hillary when I say that we have to hold on to the Senate. For people who believe the most important thing in the election is to destroy the "GOP-E", they want Republican senators to lose.

If we can get past this election and hang on to the Senate, the numbers will favor us moving forward. But this year, 24 of the 34 seats up are held by Republicans, so we're incredibly vulnerable.

25 posted on 02/29/2016 9:54:55 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Not to worry you any further, but there is a two and a half week period between when the new Senate comes in, and the new president is inaugurated. That means that Obama is going to be in office for two and a half weeks with the new Senate.

A newly elected Senate is not bound by any rules of the prior Senate. They can make up whatever rules they want, including no filibusters, reducing the number necessary for a quorum, etc..

In other worlds, if the Democrats win the Senate this November, you can expect to see them hold incredibly expedited hearings on Obama's Supreme Court nominee, and fam through that confirmation before the new President is inaugurated. Totally legal/Constitutional.

Which means we could lose the Supreme Court before the new President even takes office, even if the current Senate GOP hold firm.

26 posted on 02/29/2016 9:59:22 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No it’s not “all about SCOTUS”.

SCOTUS always has the same importance as a vacancy can open on any given day.

Other issues rise and fall in importance, but SCOTUS is a constant.


27 posted on 02/29/2016 10:11:42 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Trump and/or Cruz, it's all good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is one of the many reasons why I believe that all the ‘conservatives’ who are claiming that they won’t support Trump will eventually come around to vote for him. There is simply too much at stake.


28 posted on 02/29/2016 10:14:00 AM PST by No Dems 2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73; datura

Before the Fed came into being, JP Morgan and other big New York money center bankers performed the backstop function that the Fed is tasked with doing.

Morgan and his fellow bankers did it out of necessity and what they were doing was in a gray area legally. After the Panic of 1907 they knew that the US economy had grown too big for them to backstop and they pushed for the creation of a central bank to free themselves from having to try to bail out the US banking system.

The Fed was created to be a consortium of private banks with some government oversight.


29 posted on 02/29/2016 10:14:05 AM PST by Pelham (more than an election. Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: al_c

I used to.

Ted has so jumped the shark with me, I don’t want him anywhere near decision making on my behalf.


30 posted on 02/29/2016 10:16:09 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The McConnell-led majority would much rather confirm the Obama nominee than Ted Cruz. The last thing they want is a Justice who actually knows and supports the constitution.


31 posted on 02/29/2016 10:24:56 AM PST by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Probably so.

I’m not for that either.


32 posted on 02/29/2016 10:34:55 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Appreciate the info.

So, the idea was to give a BIGGER group of (independent) foreign interests/people this ‘backstop’ authority; over a system that couldn’t be controlled prior, backed by the taxpayer. Gotcha. ‘Gray area’, indeed.

I still seem to be missing that Central Planning Amendment that must have been passed some time ago. I’m sure I’m missing something.


33 posted on 02/29/2016 10:45:17 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
A newly elected Senate is not bound by any rules of the prior Senate.

A Democrat controlled Senate is not bound by any rules.

The only reason that Harry Reid did not abolish the Supreme Court filibuster when he unilaterally abolished the filibuster of all other presidential appointments is because there were no Supreme Court vacancies at the time. If Scalia had died while the Democrats still controlled the Senate there is no doubt whatsoever that Reid would have unilaterally abolished the filibuster for Supreme Court appointments as well.

So you are absolutely correct that this is yet another reason why the Republicans (RINOs and all) need to hold on to the Senate this election. If not, then in January you can count on every single judicial vacancy (from Supreme Court down to the district courts) being filled by Obama and Schumer before the next President is sworn in.

34 posted on 02/29/2016 11:07:36 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

In your opinion, how has he jumped the shark?


35 posted on 02/29/2016 11:22:42 AM PST by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I'll back Rubio...

If that doesn't tell you all you needed to know about Ted and his dedication to getting our borders under control, nothing will.

36 posted on 02/29/2016 11:24:37 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
<>If justices can act like a continuing constitutional convention in which five men and women can transform settled law on whim, we have passed from the rule of law to the rule of men.<>

There are two powers above Scotus.

God Himself.

We the People.

It is way past time to trim the wings of a morally twisted Scotus. Article V is right in front of our noses.

37 posted on 02/29/2016 12:05:28 PM PST by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Didn’t John Roberts’ betrayal on Obamacare destroy the argument that we need a GOPe president for SCOTUS appointments.

If you don’t know by now that there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the Rats and the GOPe, you are either part of the GOPe scumbags or you’re just plain stupid.


38 posted on 02/29/2016 12:11:28 PM PST by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

“So, the idea was to give a BIGGER group of (independent) foreign interests/people this ‘backstop’ authority; over a system that couldn’t be controlled prior, backed by the taxpayer. Gotcha. ‘Gray area’, indeed.”

No foreign interests involved.

“’backstop’ authority”- Banks require a lender of last resort.

” over a system that couldn’t be controlled prior, backed by the taxpayer. “ Taxpayers are not involved.


39 posted on 03/09/2016 7:58:02 AM PST by Pelham (more than election. Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson