Skip to comments.
Results from Nevada
CNN Politics ^
| CNN
Posted on 02/23/2016 9:02:31 PM PST by FormerRep
http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/nv/
Here are the results.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; luzer; luzers; nevada; nevadaprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-168 last
To: trebb
Marco
"Gang of Eight PRO-AMNESTY BILL" Rubio
has NOT won ONE State,
and
is currently polling THIRD in his home state of FLORIDA. Watch what happens ON SUPER TUESDAY.
"A number of Jeb's supporters went to Trump instead of padding Rubio as much as they had hoped. "
DUAH !
Have you even CONSIDERED THE FACT that,
Jeb "La Raza" Bush's supporters WERE "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" and THEIR BACKERS !
So now they've BOUGHT Marco "Gang of Eight PRO-AMNESTY BILL" Rubio !
Did you ever think that's WHY
"A number of Jeb's supporters went to Trump instead ..." ?
161
posted on
02/24/2016 10:50:53 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: proudpapa
"Look for Cruz to bounce back in the Bible Belt."
I'm counting on it.
162
posted on
02/24/2016 10:53:52 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
Oh how jack booted of me...
again I say the Medellin case was never tried in the World Court...
To: Tennessee Nana
You can NOT understand the WORD
"AGAINST" ! Read it again, DUMMY.
The World Court was
TRYING to get DOMINION THOROUGH the
Medellin v. Texas IN the United States SUPREME COURT ! HOW
DENSE CAN YOU GET ? ! !
"Ted Cruz, who won cases ....against the World Court. ..."
this is not true...
the Medellin case was never tried in the World Court..."
IT IS REVEALING WHAT YOU LEFT OUT, TO TWIST MY WORDS INTO A LIE. Look what
I found:
Ted Cruz, a Republican, represents Texas in the Senate.
... In the 2008 case Medellin v. Texas, which I argued as solicitor general of Texas, the high court upheld U.S. sovereignty
and prevented the president from using a treaty to overrule the Texas judicial system.
The central questions in that case were:one could the World Court use a treatyto order American courts to reopen final criminal convictions;
and, two,could the president order state courtsto submit to the World Court's authority?
Texas argued that the answer to both questions was no,
and the Supreme Court agreed, 6 to 3.
...If the Supreme Court concludes that a treaty can be used to prosecute Americans,regardless of their constitutional rights,
the ramifications could be alarming were these treaties to be ratified:
- Nothing would stop the United Nation's Arms Trade Treaty from being used to vanquish Americans' Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
- Under the Convention on the Law of the Sea,
U.S. businesses could be subject to the decisions of the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea based in Hamburg, Germany,rather than the rulings of American courts.
- The Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities could allow
decisions on how to educate a child with disabilities to be made by foreign tribunalsrather than by the child's parents.
... It is the province and duty of the Supreme Court to interpret U.S. law.
No treaty should abdicate this decision-making power to another authority.
In Medellin v. Texas, the Supreme Court rightly defended U.S. sovereignty and upheld the structural limitations on government power, which serve to protect individual liberty in the United States.
...
So now,
YOU SHOULD APOLOGIZE FOR TRYING TO TWIST MY WORDS
164
posted on
02/24/2016 11:35:05 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Smokin' Joe
We haven't had a situation where we'd find out if those who didn't support a Conservative in the primary would vote for the Conservative in the General. If Cruz does not get the nomination, that test will not be made this time either.You had a lit of "ifs" in your post - keep telling yourself that while stressing the word "conservative" - you have only your mind telling you how bad somebody who isn't Cruz will do, but you insist on thinking the worst so you have an excuse to allow the Dims another shot.
165
posted on
02/24/2016 11:41:40 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Yosemitest
Did you ever think that's WHY "A number of Jeb's supporters went to Trump instead ..." ?For your thesis to be correct, then they should have considered Trump anathema from the start - they just got tire of backing losers and opted to try to get some return on their support - have you considered that????
166
posted on
02/24/2016 11:58:14 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: trebb
TRUMP VOTERS
DON'T "THINK" ! They "FFFFFEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL !
167
posted on
02/24/2016 12:00:40 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: trebb
Actually, I only used the word “if” once.
168
posted on
02/24/2016 12:06:27 PM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-168 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson