Posted on 02/22/2016 8:31:51 AM PST by elhombrelibre
And so it begins (again)...
When Ben Carson got a little to close to him in the polls, Donald Trump compared him to a child molester, and when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) began to get close to him before the Iowa caucuses, Trump, the GOP leader in the presidential race, started suggesting that Cruz was not a natural born citizen. And, now that Marco Rubio seems to have picked up some momentum with a second place finish in South Carolina, Donald Trump has started to direct his ad hominem venom at the Florida senator.
It started with a tweet the morning of the S.C. primary:
(Excerpt) Read more at mrctv.org ...
Let the People decide if they want a President born of two citizen parents (Trump), one citizen parent (Cruz), or no citizen parents (Rubio and Jindal).
The people already said No to Jindal.
Then why does he keep threatening them?
That is one of the ways. In the business world, which is what Trump is use to, the threat of a lawsuit is sometimes better than a lawsuit.
Check your sources. Columbia University doesn’t seem to agree with you.
http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/AmLegalHist/WillHamiltonProject
During the period when a presidential run by Hamilton would have been practically possible, ranging from his resignation as the Secretary of the Treasury in 1796 to his death in 1804, a hypothetical candidate Hamilton would have easily met the latter two of the required criteria. In 1796, when his resignation as Secretary of the Treasury would have allowed him to run for President, he would have been 41 years old. Likewise, he had been a resident of New York for some 22 years in 1796, dating from his initial attendance at King’s College (Now Columbia University) since 1774.
In politics that's known as an empty threat or a political stunt.
NO anchor baby has citizenship, even though it is being recognized...giving it to them is a perversion of the law.
“Every Person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.******* This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, **********who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”
Senator Jacob Howard,
co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, 1866.
The exact same thing would be said upon filing of a lawsuit.
If he files that kind of takes the "empty threat" out of the equation.
Trump: pro Planed Parenthood, and against giving land back to the states, unable to decide between Israel and Islam, pro abortion etc. He is a big gov’t liberal.
Oh, but is against The Establishment. So is Sanders - go vote for him.
“Born here of citizen parents” Really?
I have three grandchildren. Their mother was born here of natural born parents (us), grandparents and great grandparents, but their father is a foreign national.
So, under your “analysis”, my grandchildren are not “natural born citizens” because they do not have two citizen parents.
And that’s what the Founders intended. I think not.
Wrong? Are my grandchildren “natural born citizens”? Yes or no.
That’s why I said citizenship (maybe). Sadly, there is a law that provides for citizenship for all people born in the US. The 14th Amendment doesn’t require it for visiting tourists, refugees, or illegal aliens. Permanent residents with a green card, I don’t know for sure. Rubio may be a citizen under the law, but that does not make him a NBC without further court clarification.
That’s exactly what they intended.
Foreign national parents bring foreign nationalities and loyalties.
And this shows why your “natural born citizen” analysis is garbage. My grandchildren have naturally born grandparents (us), four citizen great-grandparents ( two of whom were naval officers in WW2), and eight citizen great-great grandparents, but, to you Trumpies, the kids “bring foreign nationalities and loyalties.”
And that’s not what The Founders intended.
Unable to win the election on conservative policies ( sorely lacking in the Trump campaign) you try to win on this smear instead.
Very sad.
Neither Rubio’s nor Jindal’s parents were US citizens when they were born. What a crazy race, THREE non-eligible guys.
He’s correct.
Because that is what it is!
Rep. John A. Bingham,In the United States House on March 9, 1866 commenting upon Section 1992 of the Civil Rights Act, was “simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution,that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
Rep. John A. Bingham,In the United States House on March 9, 1866 commenting upon Section 1992 of the Civil Rights Act, was “simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution,that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
Rubio was never another citizen before American. The second he popped out of his mama, he was American. And how soon did he get his USA BC? Probably right then, in an American hospital. He has FAR MORE CLAIM to NBC status than Cruz, who was not officially American until age 16.
The only question is, was Rubio an anchor baby, born to an illegal in this country? I don’t think so. I think his mom had a work permit or green card, so she was a legal resident. As long as that is true, that she was legally here, he was NBC and he proved it right after birth if he had a BC right away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.