Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The South Carolina primary results don't mean Trump will be the nominee
The Brookings Institute ^ | February 20, 2016 | John Hudak

Posted on 02/20/2016 8:55:29 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Today, South Carolina Republicans cast votes in the 2016 presidential primary. As expected, two things happened. First, Donald Trump wiped the floor with the competition. Second, pundits have overreacted in declaring that his second win clears him a path to the nomination. The latter is not only premature, but rabidly underestimates how the party primary system works. But in due fairness, let's address both points.

Trump continues to be underestimated

This is not a post to bash Donald Trump. In fact, as a student of elections, Trump wildly impresses me. He entered a crowded race in which Republicans had not just a number of choices, but a diverse set of good choices. The GOP had young and old, white and nonwhite, male and female, domestic policy guys and foreign policy wonks, experienced politicians and newcomers. Ben and Jerry may have endorsed Bernie Sanders, but the GOP race quickly became the Baskin Robbins of politics.

Enter Donald Trump. He surely brought something different and new to the table. But along with his success as a businessman and tremendous wealth, he also had an easily critiqued history and absolutely no political experience. Combine that with the lack of polish and decorum expected of presidential contenders, and his candidacy seemed not only easily undermined, but doomed. Everyone underestimated Trump, assuming his brash, flippant, offensive, brutally honest, and clearly genuine rhetoric would force him out of the race quickly. Nothing was further from the truth.

As time went on, he just grew more popular. Comments that would normally force a candidate from the race--and political relevance generally--seemed to propel Trump further. And that success continues. After losing a controversial race to an even more controversial Ted Cruz in Iowa, Trump went on to win in New Hampshire and again tonight in South Carolina. That success is indisputable. It is a testament to a very different candidate, who does whatever he wants, in a year where predictions and expectations are thrown out the window. Actually, somehow Mr. Trump has built a wall to combat common wisdom and he's making the political intelligentsia pay for it.

Tonight's win in South Carolina is not only impressive in itself, but it is in a state that had clear currents and moments that favored other candidates. Jeb Bush should have won South Carolina because his father and brother were successful in the state and still remain very well liked. Marco Rubio should have won South Carolina because his story is a compelling one; his foreign policy chops connect well with a defense-oriented state, and Nikki Haley, the popular Republican governor, endorsed him. Ted Cruz should have won South Carolina because the Republican electorate is deeply conservative and disproportionately evangelical Christian. Donald Trump most certainly should not have won South Carolina. He's a wealthy New York businessman with New York values, multiple divorces, a slight relationship to religion, and a history of supporting liberal causes--traits that typically don't resonate with South Carolina Republicans. Yet, despite all of the things other candidates had going for them and the myriad reasons Trump shouldn't have won, the Palmetto State picked the Donald. His message focused on fear, anger, disgust, and a desire to "Make America Great Again" touched a nerve. It's quite odd. In some ways, "Make America Great Again" is the 2016 version of "Yes, We Can." People are responding to the message not necessarily because of its substance, but it makes them feel the way they want to feel. It inspires them as the kind of alternative they want to see. Earlier this week, I drew parallels between how Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump connect with very different supporters in very similar ways. But perhaps, instead, Donald Trump is the 2016 and Republican version of Barack Obama. Trump supporters hope he can change Obama's "Hope and Change."

There is no reason on paper, by demographics, or by outward appearance Donald Trump should be successful in South Carolina, but alas, he won the primary there and marches on to Nevada and then Super Tuesday with more wind at his back than any other candidate by far. His momentum is huge.

Why Donald Trump is overestimated

Every other Republican candidate--and probably both Democratic candidates--would love to be in Donald Trump's shoes. Dominant, in control of most news cycles, Teflon to scandal and his own gaffes, connecting with should-be-out-of-reach demographic groups with ease, and trouncing the competition. Despite that, the reports of Donald Trump's coronation as the next Republican nominee are quite premature. He may well end up the GOP nominee. Yet, there are several reasons why he may not.

The GOP race remains a crowded field. There are five other candidates of varying success and even if you discount Carson (you should) and Bush (you probably should), Cruz and Rubio are serious contenders. So long as that many candidates remain in the race, it becomes difficult for Trump to amass a majority of delegates heading into Cleveland. Cruz and Rubio may not be able to beat Trump in many of the states to come, but they can be enough of a nuisance to keep him from the type of "clinch" we have seen in previous years after a handful of primaries and caucuses. That moment usually comes early (or early-ish) when it becomes clear someone will march to the convention and the race effectively ends. This year is not one of those years.

Party rules make it hard for Trump to clinch. While some states are winner-take-all in their allocation of delegates. Many are not. Many allocate strictly proportionally or function as a winner-take-all if and only if a candidate receives a supermajority (between 66 percent and 85 percent depending on the state). Trump is "winning" by pulling 30-40 percent of states' votes, making those winner-take-all-thresholds far out of reach. It also makes securing the nomination formally (winning a majority of delegates) or informally (broad support being so obvious that further competition is seen as fruitless) that much more difficult.

Party leaders don't like Donald Trump and they're scared to death of his candidacy. The GOP brass see themselves--right or not--to be in a very strong position this year. Secretary Clinton's candidacy exists in the shadow of scandals and investigations and her primary competition is a self-described socialist. They think their chances to retake the White House are quite good, but only if they have the right candidate. They believe Donald Trump is not that candidate. The Republican primary contest has "uncommitted delegates" (Democrats call them "superdelegates") who are able to cast convention votes without input from voters. There are fewer of them than Democrats have, but in a close primary contest, they may make a difference. These unpledged delegates tend to be state party leaders.

If Republicans head to Cleveland with no candidate securing a majority of delegates (every political pundit's daydream), and a brokered convention comes to fruition, the uncommitted delegates may play an outsized role. So, too, may the party brass--the baron-like establishment that Trump and his supporters rail against. It would be a risky proposition to strip the man with the most delegates from being the nominee, but the party may see it as their only avenue to beating a Democrat in November and thus make it a reality. For the GOP leadership the calculus is easy: if we nominate Trump we absolutely lose; if we give the nomination to someone else, Trump's supporters will be angry, but we at least have a chance of winning. Economists' expected value calculations make that decision a no-brainier. The politician's calculations make it more difficult.

That said, if Republican leadership have any opportunity to usurp Trump's momentum and keep him from being the 2016 Republican Party nominee, they will do it. The crowded field, the primary rules, and the preferences of many in the party mean it's a real possibility. Trump and, in a similar way, Ted Cruz have built campaigns and candidacies based on running against and explicitly spitting in the face of the party brass. They work well with angry voters, but in a brokered convention it is a death knell. A brokered convention is great news for party leaders afraid of Trump, for more mainstream candidates like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, and for the health of the Republican Party. But at the end of the day, the almost unbelievable state of the Republican primary could be salvaged on the floor of Cleveland's Quicken Loans Arena. If it takes that long, the man or woman chosen in a smoke-filled room may bask in the glow of being the Republican nominee. But the real winner in that situation will be the person Democrats select as their nominee a week later in Philadelphia. In that way, the only thing worse for the Republican Party than Donald Trump would be an establishment-led overthrow of Donald Trump.

For those making absolutist predictions based on the South Carolina results, take a deep breath. This race is nowhere near over. We have no idea who the nominee will be. The only thing Trump's unbelievable win in South Carolina tells us is that the Republican primary will continue to be an unbelievable mess...maybe even a YUGE one.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; brokenrecord; brookingsinstitute; cruz; cutandpastebots; gangof14; ibtz; ilovetowhine; johnhudak; propagandadujour; rubio; tdscoffeclutch; tedcruz; tedspacificpartners; trump; usualsuspect; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah; willthemudstick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 last
To: TheConservativeParty

Agreed.


281 posted on 02/21/2016 3:46:48 PM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

His constant unsubstantiated lies and claims about Cruz are intolerable. It sounds like a Hitler Youth rally, talking about the Jews. I was watching the Nuremberg trials last night and the similarities struck me. It is all the anger and the hate, directed at the innocent instead of the real culprits.


282 posted on 02/21/2016 4:39:38 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I was thinking of a way to describe the antipathy toward Trump among the secular Conservatives and even some of the Christian Conservatives and it comes down to New York values and every time that Trump goes on a smear campaign, it reinforces the opinion that Trump is a crass New Yorker...but they are laughing their heads off because Trump,is taking out the only real Conservative in the bunch.

The Real Conservative that was not native born? The brilliant Constitutional lawyer that does not even know he is not eligible to be our President? How many others are out there like me? I have been aware for over fifty years that a President must be born on US territory. I am not alone, count on it.

283 posted on 02/21/2016 6:13:01 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! - already voted for Trump 2016 & Dude, Cruz ain't bona fide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
You just got schlonged by a super schlongmeister, and you're getting saucy with me? Look me up next Jan. 31, I might just let you cry on my shoulder.
284 posted on 02/21/2016 6:27:55 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house , the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutierrez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson; LS

Keep laughing, guys, all the way to the ...... uh, oh.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3399899/posts


285 posted on 02/21/2016 6:41:33 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house , the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutierrez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus; Liz; LS; Rebelbase
So what is Cruz's position really? Do you know what his talking points are? Really?

Talking points? Dude! Seriously? You think you support what you claim to be a serious candidate and you try to convince us by asking about his talking points? With that kind of buzz spinning around in your head you must live inside the Beltway.

Yes we all read his so called issue papers on his webstie. Boorrrrinnnnnng!

286 posted on 02/21/2016 6:55:07 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: free_life
I called Trump vs Sanders in early September and that is exactly what it will be.

No, it's going to be Trump vs Hillary. I called that last fall too.

The Dem party is even more corrupt than the Republican Party, if that is possible, and Sanders isn't going to be allowed anywhere close to winning.

Look at all the delegates Hillary is racking up BETWEEN primaries.

287 posted on 02/21/2016 7:16:45 PM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

All the way to Making America Great Again. Happy to do so without your help. American Revolution was won with less than 1/3 of the people doing the work.


288 posted on 02/22/2016 3:08:01 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: LS
American Revolution was won with less than 1/3 of the people doing the work.

Well, good luck with the 47%, Sparky.

By the way, isn't that game one you Beltway Boys have been playing at, and losing, since about 2008?

Keep the conservatives at home, so you can have all the glory and control to yourselves?

Do tell.

289 posted on 02/22/2016 3:23:45 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house , the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutierrez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus; Jim Robinson
I don't believe your poll results.

Tell Jim.

290 posted on 02/22/2016 3:27:35 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

The conservatives, “Sparky,” in case you haven’t been watching the polls and elections, are backing Trump. He wins even the “very conservatives.” So you can quit that little game right now, “Sparky.”


291 posted on 02/22/2016 3:32:42 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: LS; lentulusgracchus

“The conservatives, “Sparky,” in case you haven’t been watching the polls and elections, are backing Trump. He wins even the “very conservatives.” So you can quit that little game right now, “Sparky.””

What you said, LS. Those darn “very conservatives” anyway : )


292 posted on 02/22/2016 7:17:00 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson