Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DIRTY TRICKS CAMPAIGN=> Cruz Camp and Cronies Continue the Disgusting and Dishonest Antics
Gateway Pundit ^ | 02/16/16 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 02/16/2016 1:12:19 PM PST by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last
To: for-q-clinton
So you’re on board with working deals with the democrat MINORITY leaders but not the House and Senate leaders who happen to be Republican. That’s a recipe for disaster...he might as well run as a democrat.

Nope. He won't have to compromise with the GOP-e. Obama has shown how easily they fold. You don't even have to do anything, only tell them that you're going to do something, and they'll surrender...

Even if they take a stand on stalling Obama's replacement for Scalia, it won't make up for their rolling over on gazillions of his picks, and having let the Dems stall on a gazillion of Bush's picks.

Not to mention Robert Bork.

161 posted on 02/16/2016 6:53:12 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: jennychase
You says "Republicans will be in a strong position to improve its share of the black vote in 2016 if @realDonaldTrump is nominee." @SenatorSessions

Can you link that quote to a credible source please? My Startpage search give me nothing.

Thanks

162 posted on 02/16/2016 6:53:44 PM PST by LowOiL (Woe to you when all men speak well of you, for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Why is she wearing tiny saguaro cacti as earrings?


163 posted on 02/16/2016 6:53:56 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
It;s Ok with Rush, Levin and who cares Beck.

Rush even when so far as to say he doesn't get involved in primaries except against Perot?

I thought Perot was an independent? what primary?

What is Rush on? Levin's finance's son works for Cruz and isn't happy with his blow back

Beck well enough said.

Cruz might die in South Carolina

Rush must have been referring to summer of 1992 during re-election campaign of Bush41 when he was cementing himself into the uniparty by attacking Perot on both Social Security and NAFTA, and I myself was part of the chorus still believing the nonsense. I pulled the lever again for Bush even though my inner self was telling me that it was a mistake.

Rush was becoming/became part of the soft sell for internationalism, and remember how he picked up the ball later for the Dubai ports deal and really swallowed everything during Bush43. Looking back there was nothing globalist that he refused to accept. And it wasn't until this past summer that the term "uniparty" ever crossed his lips, thanks to Trump. He is getting the message, but very slowwwwwlllyyyy.

P.S. Speaking of crazy lies, I've now seen video twice of Cruz on Hannity saying that Trump has been pro-abortion for 60 years. I'm sure he is just 69 years old so what the frig is he smoking?

164 posted on 02/16/2016 7:11:01 PM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jennychase
Ok, traced the quote back to a Buzzfeed article.

Except it reads far different that that quote.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/darrensands/a-quiet-republican-theory-donald-trump-can-win-black-voters#.movOroYJN

QUOTE: " think he's going to be talking about issues that could appeal to African Americans -- like trade," Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions told BuzzFeed News. "So I think there could be support for him there." END QUOTE

Notice that quote does not match what you posted.

Here is what you posted. QUOTE: "Republicans will be in a strong position to improve its share of the black vote in 2016 if @realDonaldTrump is nominee." @SenatorSessions ...END QUOTE

165 posted on 02/16/2016 7:16:00 PM PST by LowOiL (Woe to you when all men speak well of you, for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #166 Removed by Moderator

To: for-q-clinton

As opposed to Trump who uses taxpayer money to pay off his debts. He takes loses and goes bankrupt. Writes it off on his taxes and the taxpayer covers it. Meanwhile he’s sure to get his money out of it.
==
Then he’ll probably be able to get Mexico to build that wall.


167 posted on 02/16/2016 7:30:44 PM PST by QuigleyDU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Subsequent dirty tricks by Cruz campaign consistent with this earlier fraudulent and threatening Cruz mailer:


168 posted on 02/16/2016 7:43:04 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

“I just read that Jeb!.com clicks are getting redirected to trump.com......My God Trump is a sleazy lying bastid”

You’re just making up more lies yourself, as usual.

There’s no such website as “Jeb!.com”

AND you’re lies are pathetic anyway; everyone can see that’s not even a valid domain name.


169 posted on 02/16/2016 7:45:26 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

No one believed these stupid stories


170 posted on 02/16/2016 7:50:30 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
He must have been referring to this one ...

http://www.jebbush.com/

171 posted on 02/16/2016 7:50:44 PM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Democratic-Republican

Jeb never owned that domain and it has never been used for his campaign. Trump doesn’t own it either. This issue was debunked two months ago:

” As it turns out, the Bush campaign doesn’t own jebbush.com. The domain name is owned by a company called Fabulous.com Pty Ltd., an Australian company that helps people monetize their internet domain names. The site was apparently created on Nov. 19, 1997 and updated on Oct. 20, 2015, according to a domain registration search.

Both Jeb Bush’s and Donald Trump’s campaigns have denied involvement.

The Bush campaign also doesn’t own www.jebbushforpresident.com. That domain name is owned by a gay couple encouraging readers to “have a Chat, Share Viewpoints, and Learn from Each Other.” Jebbushforpresident.net is an anti-Bush site created by “a loyal Florida Republican in the hope of saving the Republican party from supporting Jeb Bush for President.”

Bush’s isn’t alone. Former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina found out not long after her presidential announcement that CarlyFiorina.org that someone purchased the website and filled it with one sad face emoticon to represent every person at the company laid off during her tenure. TedCruz.com was snatched up by someone who plastered the words, “Support president Obama. Immigration reform now!” across the page.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/who-owns-jebbush-com/


172 posted on 02/16/2016 8:14:53 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Yawn.

omg I’ll vote for that democrat trump now...not!!!


173 posted on 02/16/2016 8:17:59 PM PST by RginTN (Donald J Trump- why would the people of Ky want a rookie senator when they have Sen Mitch Mcconnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Read slowly, Trumpbots:

“Of course, Senator Cruz denied having anything to do with the ads.

But it was a lie.

And now there is proof that a Cruz PAC is behind the nasty anti-Trump and anti-Rubio robocalls.”

Note that in the first sentence, Cruz denies involvement. Note in the third sentence that Cruz is *not* involved.

How is any of this a “lie”?

Ugh. Trumpbots twist the facts so much it’s abolutely pathetic.


174 posted on 02/16/2016 8:20:14 PM PST by Theo (Trump = French Revolution. Cruz = American Revolution. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain

Yes, this article lies. It twists facts to make Cruz look like he’s lying. But the evidence isn’t there.


175 posted on 02/16/2016 8:21:12 PM PST by Theo (Trump = French Revolution. Cruz = American Revolution. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
Thanks for all the info!

1997 is a long time to cybersquat that bush name. Wow.

I wonder if anyone snaked any Trump names yet? Squatters would have to be pretty brave, they can either expect a payday, or being served with papers.

176 posted on 02/16/2016 8:22:48 PM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

So you’re saying with the majority in the senate and house and the fact that they GOP will rollover for Trump...he should still negotiate with Pelosi and Schumer? Why on earth would we want him to do that?


177 posted on 02/16/2016 9:19:06 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
So you’re saying with the majority in the senate and house and the fact that they GOP will rollover for Trump...he should still negotiate with Pelosi and Schumer? Why on earth would we want him to do that?

(sighs heavily).

Well, Trump can't count on the wet Kleenex tensile strength of the GOP-e Congress, right?

So he has to go it alone.

And as Rush quoted the late Justice Scalia as saying, "Are you kidding? The leftists NEVER change their minds."

And, as the GOP-e will try to backstab Trump, just as they would Cruz, that means it will be Trump alone against the Democrats.,

Without support from the GOP, he cannot steamroller the Dems.

That leaves caving (euphemistically called "compromise" which to a Dem means "the Democrats keep all their must haves and the Republicans surrender all of their must haves, and give a couple of concessions as well for good measure"...

(This is all the GOP-e has ever done).

OR

...since, without GOP-e support, a "flawless victory" is out of the question, making a deal.

In which, as I noted before, each side gets some of what they want, and gives up some of what they want.

That's a hell of a lot better than the GOP has ever done, even under Reagan: look at Reagan's Amnesty deal, his tax cuts, his military growth: all squandered by globalist traitors like Bush, and buried and cannibalized by the GOP-e, in search of things to surrender to the Dems in order to get sloppy seconds from the Dem's call girls, or get invited to the tony cocktail parties where everyone openly laughs at them the moment they leave the room...

If you want to *win*, you need to primary Mitch McCuckold, and about two dozen other Senators, and an equal proportion of GOP sellout House members, rather than childish, smug ad hominem attacks on Trump supporters.

And do it all in the same election cycle, so the hydra cannot regenerate immediately.

178 posted on 02/16/2016 9:38:56 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

That so much spin.


179 posted on 02/16/2016 10:12:10 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
You've accused Trump supporters of having a 1st-grade education, and a 2nd-grade education.

But when one posts at a higher level, you are reduced to grammatical errors and sputtering:

"That so much spin"

Troll status: confirmed.

180 posted on 02/16/2016 10:21:45 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson