Posted on 02/10/2016 2:17:21 PM PST by TBBT
Was not Rush pushing Rubio just a few days ago? Rush is a phony. I stopped listening to him years ago.
Roberts was not Cruz’s first choice.
He was the choice of Bush simply because he did not have a paper trail. Cruz argued for a real conservative.
However, once Bush made his choice Cruz had to support his boss. Cruz has said he regrets it.
you listened but did not hear
to continue to not hear is perhaps detrimental
You take everything personal and to an extreme.
it is possible to observe and issue a finding of what was observed. The finding can be without either favor or prejudice. It is what was observed.
Typical Cruz, nothing is ever his fault, he got an excuse for every bad decision he’s made.
Get back to me when you are able to put a coherent thought together.
Profound sounding but wrong.
Conservatism is a worldview that is founded on this concession: "man is depraved."
Nationalism is a worldview that is founded on this assertion: "virtue is collective."
Matthew 3:9
And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
Romans 2:29
But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Rush....get back with us an tell us how Ted Cruz is going to win a general election with just you, Levin & Nutcase, Glenn Bech supporting him!!! You three fine gents have either been smoking too much reefer, drinking Jim Jones Kool-aid, or just sumply are all insane!!! LMAO!!!
Go Donald J. Trump!!!
Why do you assume that if someone disagrees with you, that they’re “parroting unsupported conclusions”?
Maybe the reason they disagree with you is because they know more about it than you do.
I only wish. Daddy needs a new bass boat!
The one issue that Cruz is not conservative on is legal immigration—
I do not understand why the H-1B visa issue is totally disregarded by Limbaugh, Levin, and Beck. I have emailed them on this issue, more than once, with no response either in writing or on radio. Interestingly, I seem to recall both Limbaugh and Levin talking about H-1B visas (and other Visas) but for some reason, they give Cruz a pass. For me, my first choice was never Cruz because of it.
lol - you missed taking your prozac.
Many argue he is...
On the other side of the political coin they rigged the Democrats into believing open borders and illegal immigration and sanctuary cities were a liberal cause.....when all it did was make Americans poorer and benefited the cheap labor lobby. There would be no need for minimum wage if American citizens had the right to compete only with legal labor, instead of illegals.
Trump was the wake-up call on immigration and so called free trade that the D/R establishment fears.
— Ap
LOL!!
BTTT!
I’m fed up with your dishonesty and here’s my challenge: let’s open up a new thread and let’s debate it...you can bring forth Trump’s mythical conservatism and I’ll bring Ted Cruz’ solid, unquestionable conservative credentials. I do note you’ve already set up an escape clause by claiming no one is the final “arbiter, which really begs the question of how you plan on redefining it.
I would say Nationalism is my priority.
This election is about Nationalism vs Globalism.
Trump presents himself as a Nationalist even if he has had policies that are not orthodox conservative. Though socialist, Sanders is far more Nationalist than Hillary (who is knee-deep with the finance clique and the CFR-types).
If this country and its politics doesn’t take a Nationalist turn, it will be game over for the country, game over for our Constitutional system, and game over by definition, for conservatism.
Conservatives tell me the country needs to adjust its tie when in fact its pants are on fire.....
How many replies flatly announcing your opinion without any supporting evidence or even any supporting arguments on this subject have you posted?
An opinion can be supported by evidence without having to specifically detail all that evidence over and over and over and over again.
Funny thing is - if more people actually knew anything about the NBC issue, then people would already know this, and wouldn’t have to think they were “debunking” anything by asking for the evidence one more time.
I didn’t.
How many?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.