Posted on 02/09/2016 1:39:30 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
Ted Cruz's was a good response and it was the proper response. Trump's answer was just bluster trying to make himself look like a tough guy.
Shouldn’t the title be, “Ted Cruz responds to a Woman attending a Donald Trump Rally”?
Need repeating, thanks manc
The next time Trump discusses anything of substance in depth will be the first time.
Also, it was announce he is getting a lot of Gay lobby money to go along with his Hedge fund and Wall Street GS money.
didn’tAgain? Do you have a source?
The leftists and dregs in the media like to misinterpret and magnify anything their "enemies" say to discredit them, like they successfully did against George Allen when he was running for the senate in Virginia. He lost because fifteen years or more ago he used the word "macaca."
That tactic will not work for Trump. Hurray! Free at last!
Of course the same press ignores the real and disgusting profanity used by Hillary over the years.
Meow!
Said the phony religious guy Cruz who barred false witness
and stole nice Doc Carson’s votes.
Says a guy being investigated for violations of election laws with his “SHAMING” mail. Cruz is the second coming of Tricky Millhouse Cruz
Did Nixon use profanity on the campaign trail? Did he use it in front of families? Children?
No
“Profanity? using a word that primarily means CAT, and next means WIMP is vulgar? LOL”
Then you obviously won’t mind if you are called a pussy. Please laugh and say thank you.
It’s kinda catchy!
Way to go, GGG, but she won’t read it.
They hide from any truth they haven’t ‘created.’
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
did Nixon intimidate voters with data from their voters records without permission?
Cruz did. Nixon didn’t rig election, Kennedy did.
Cruz has bigger problems
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/new-hampshire-republican/
I had not read that part of what he said, thanks for the info....and I have no problem with it.
The problem I have here with zealots on both sides is that their candidates are held up as perfect, without any fault. Each side accuses the other of holding their guy up as some sort of cult.
I, myself, hope and pray that the man who can get the job done is the one who is elected.
Thanks for the link.
I’ve been saying now there is a strong human desire simply to be told what to do and be led by a “strong man” in the image of Putin, Castro, Teddy Roosevelt, etc.
Strong men can be good or bad or just stupid.
I’m afraid what we have here is stupid bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.