Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/06/2016 4:33:29 PM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: COUNTrecount

2 posted on 02/06/2016 4:42:49 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

If you ask 100 people in the military what would happen if they handled classified material the way Hillary did, all of them (even democrats) would say that they would end up in prison for a long time. You would get the same result with NSA, CIA, and even government contractors. Jonathan Pollard could tell you what happens even if you allow our allies access to classified information. Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden (if we ever catch him) could elaborate on what happens when classified information is mishandled. Hillary was the worst of them all, and she may get promoted for her crimes.


3 posted on 02/06/2016 4:43:11 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


4 posted on 02/06/2016 4:46:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
From the article:

The publicly available information makes clear she and her aides violated so many elementary security prohibitions that alumni are speechless. They wonder, had they done what she did, how quickly they would have lost their clearances and jobs and how extensive the criminal indictments against them would be.

**************

It is doubtful that Hillary's people had security clearances. Ask the FBI agents in charge of trying to get them all to comply with the law.

Hillary joked about how she was able to keep Huma from having to meet with the people conducting them.

So, what does that say?

They were handling Top Secret and Uber Top Secret information and sharing it all without even having the credentials to do so.

We take it for granted that they all had security clearances, but did they?

Will Hillary be able to convince a court of law that she really didn't know what ''Top Secret'' was, therefore she should be acquitted?

7 posted on 02/06/2016 5:01:15 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
Her Royal Arrogance did it intentionally.

One reason is that she wanted to freely share information when and to whom she saw fit.

After all, laws and cumbersome government restrictions are made for the little people.


8 posted on 02/06/2016 5:08:50 PM PST by Iron Munro (The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Who was directly responsible for monitoring State Department communications and security? Does that person, or those people, still have a job? If so, WHY?


12 posted on 02/06/2016 5:23:12 PM PST by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Extraordinarily clear and concise explanation of the Clinton Email problem.

Devastating indictment of Clinton’s arrogance and wanton disregard for the security and safety of the United States.


15 posted on 02/06/2016 6:18:46 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
State's current leadership, however, is clearly trying to provide cover for Clinton by disputing classification decisions of other agencies. Bureaucrats often engage in such internecine warfare, but the operating principle has long been that the classifier of information retains control over its distribution and release. This principle rests on the common-sense notion that the agency originating or acquiring the information is best-positioned to decide how much protection it requires. State would feel the same way the intelligence community feels today about Clinton's callous disregard for its judgments if, for instance, the Defense Department decided to declassify State reporting cables. Significantly, as Fox News's Catherine Herridge has reported, the FBI is asking the originating agencies for their judgments, rather than relying on State's post facto obstructionism.

Typical Clinton dodge: "It depends on what the meaning of 'Classified' is." All reality is based on their subjective interpretation.

16 posted on 02/06/2016 6:27:22 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

If the State Department employees, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, think that they work for the Democrat Party, then they should repay all the money the U.S. Taxpayers paid them to work for us.

And no retirement. The Democrat Party can pay that.

I am so damn tired of seeing US taxpayer-paid federal employees who are loyal to the Democrat Party but not the US taxpayers.

Make ‘em pay!


17 posted on 02/06/2016 7:21:02 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Even the NYT (after burying this tidbit far down in a story about the email problem)finally stated the legal situation:

“According to the law and security procedures Mrs. Clinton agreed to follow when she became secretary, such material should not even have been sent over the State Department’s official but unclassified state.gov server.”


21 posted on 02/07/2016 10:12:15 AM PST by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain fInor a murderer, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

In a long article on Hillary’s email problem, even the NYT had to balance their bias in her favor with this item, buried far down in the article:

“According to the law and security procedures Mrs. Clinton agreed to follow when she became secretary, such material should not even have been sent over the State Department’s official but unclassified state.gov server.”

Case closed.


22 posted on 02/07/2016 10:20:58 AM PST by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain fInor a murderer, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson