Posted on 02/05/2016 5:28:20 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Then why the hell weren't those top journalists shouting it from the rooftops and in breaking news banners? . . . On today's Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough said "as we were leaving Iowa, I heard from a lot of top journalists who whispered "you know Bernie won." I heard that time and time again. 'You know Bernie won.'"
With Scarborough asking "where is this, Bolivia in the 1930s?." and Steve Schmidt saying it was "shady as hell," the blame was laid at the feet of the Democrat party, which runs an intentionally process so it can control things. No doubt. But what about the responsibility of those "top journalists" to blow the whistle? Why did they "whisper" and speak "quietly?" How might this campaign be different if the day after Iowa the headline had been either "Bernie Wins" or "Debbie Wasserman Schultz Throws Iowa to Hillary?"
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
If ‘top journalists’ knew Bernie won Iowa, why the hell weren’t they shouting it from the rooftops?
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
'Cause they're not sure Hillary won't be elected President, and they don't like traveling in cattle cars.
Why? He’s just about outlived his usefulness. He’s rapidly becoming a useless eater and the ‘rats don’t want a decrepit old white socialist in the oval office. But he will win -
Best Supporting Socialist in a UNIPARTY production.
Feel the Bern.
It is more nefarious than that. They don t want to lose their lucrative income streams. Truth no longer matters unless it s pre-approved.
...because "reporting the news" isn't part of their job description.
On both sides, it all comes down to the bottom line
“..because “reporting the news” isn’t part of their job description.
Close - their job description is to report ALL about the Cruz shenanigans.
Cause IF Hillary were to win, these journalist hacks would have any and all access cut off.
Mr niteowl77
Because they are cowardly careerists.
Hillary is also currently ahead 385-29 in delegates in this "close race"... because she got 362 "super-delegates" before Iowa even began. Bernie has to face an uphill battle the entire way. For that alone, I hope he wins. Her dozens of felonies and the severe Karmic smack-down she needs also help me lean his way. I also think that his candidacy will be seen as a joke and he would get destroyed in the General, by anyone... even Jeb.
Why doesn’t Sanders declare himself the winner in Iowa and make Clinton prove him wrong...?
I see Trump as being the same kind of vindictive jerk as Hillary and Obama along these lines... and I don't think any of his fervent supporters could sincerely disagree. :/
They certainly aren't cowardly when they attack conservative Republicans and the traditional Americans they represent.
It is because they do not fear them. If anything a GOPer will tell the reporter I am sorry and I promise to reform my ways.
Trump will not bow down and they do fear him. Time for the liberal newsmakers (not reporters) to get their comeuppance.
Reporter's bosses (editors) are 'in tight' with the Democrat Establishment... Bosses don't want to risk losing access, leads and sources. The coin of the realm's 'insider information' - bribes are NOT in cash...
I'm guessing Sanders and Trump both won Iowa.
IOWA's the South Side of Chicago twisted by gang bangers enabled by idiot elites pretending they don't see the corruption. Longest running governor? Longest running fool...
Iowa sucks. Time to find aother State to go first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.