Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2016 5:29:35 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

‘Cruz victory threatens ethanol’s power’

They say that like it’s a bad thing. Let ethanol stand without govt crutches, if it can.


2 posted on 02/03/2016 5:36:04 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I, for one, want ethanol OUT of my gasoline. It damages engines. To protect them, you have to buy additives, which adds to the price of fuel.


3 posted on 02/03/2016 5:37:32 AM PST by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Once an industry or state gets on federal welfare, it’s like breaking a heroin habit. Ethanol dirties the environment, damages engines and has no benefit except buying votes for politicians.


4 posted on 02/03/2016 5:38:33 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Ethanol backers, however, say the meaning of the caucus results are being overhyped into a "false victory" for "Big Oil."

I don't see it so much as a victory for "Big Oil" as a victory for small engines.

If the market wants ethanol, there will be a market for ethanol. The mandate is as damaging and unnecessary as the agency to oversee it.

5 posted on 02/03/2016 5:38:39 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

“This was not about Ted Cruz, and it was never about Ted Cruz. It was about moving everyone — and also, Ted Cruz moved,” said Eric Branstad, the state director of pro-ethanol group America’s Renewable Future and Terry Branstad’s son. “

Stick it up your crony, Eric.


7 posted on 02/03/2016 5:40:21 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I am a Trump supporter, but I salute Cruz for taking his principled stand


9 posted on 02/03/2016 6:00:09 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Ethanol can still thrive. . . . In the private sector and not on the backs of the taxpayer.


10 posted on 02/03/2016 6:02:25 AM PST by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Hog and beef farmers will be thankful for less expensive feed. It may be the deciding factor in saving their farm.


11 posted on 02/03/2016 6:08:53 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

If the only thing Cruz ever accomplishes is the ultimate death of the Ethanol Teat Suckers, his candidacy will have been well worthwhile.


12 posted on 02/03/2016 6:10:25 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Populism is what Populism does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Last time I checked Cruz won’t have a line-item veto.

Ain’t enough votes in Congress to repeal Obamacare or impeach Obama. But overriding a Cruz veto on ethanol....that they can get done.


13 posted on 02/03/2016 6:12:23 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Let’s not forget, 10% ethanol in your gasoline results in a 10% reduction in fuel mileage. We’re still burning the same amount of petroleum, just subsidizing the ethanol industry and corn growers. Welfare, by another name.
I wonder who are the big ethanol investors?


14 posted on 02/03/2016 6:14:51 AM PST by Fireone (The future must belong to those who tell the truth about Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

It should threaten Iowa’s first in the nation status as well. We cannot afford to be blackmailed by the ethanol lobby every four years.


15 posted on 02/03/2016 6:23:25 AM PST by CPT Clay (Hillary: Julius and Ethal Rosenberg were electrocuted for selling classified info.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

As it should.

That stuff is ruinous to fuel systems and engines and is completely unnecessary.

I wonder if Trump would have won Iowa if he had come out against it?

Seemed like the natural position for him to take, but he didn’t.


17 posted on 02/03/2016 6:43:05 AM PST by lifeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Any way they can augment those ethanol plants to make corn liquor? Moonshine? Both a fuel and a food...


22 posted on 02/03/2016 8:20:28 AM PST by dps.inspect (quite well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson