Cant see how they could do a recount on the Rat side with the goofy way they have people move to different sides of the room and all the coin flips.
On our side we just mark a ballot and turn it in. Balliots are handed out as you register. Names are checked against voter registration lists.
Representaives from all the parties are invited to watch the counting and the ballots are retained to be recounted if needed.
Fraud is pretty hard to pull off that way.
The Rat side is open for fraud.
Do it! Fast.
Looks like voter fraud...
Why?
Late ballot boxes are a sign of voter fraud. When fraud's done boxes are kept back in close races to ‘adjust’ the vote ... Those boxes can't be sent in until the vote is known so the ‘right number’ of votes can be added.
Add too many and the fraud's obvious - add to few and an ‘Al Gore loses in Florida’ thing happens.
The FBI should investigate precincts turning in late boxes - that's where the fraud would have happened. First check the 'dead vote'. When the ‘dead’ vote's high it's a sign fraud is happening.
The way the vote's increased illegally (in the old days) was to vote the people who didn't show up to vote... hence ‘the dead’ were an unintended consequence of voter fraud. Fraud often happens in communities with traditionally higher crime rats... black and minority communities. White liberal elites choose these communities because it decreases the chances anyone will snitch. Did some of the late ballot boxes come from precincts dominated by Mexican meat packer workers?
The FBI can send out letters asking people if they voted - and at what polling station in precincts that have a large 'dead' vote.
"Once all preference groups meet the established viability threshold, the number of delegates for each group will be determined. Each group then elects its delegates and alternates from within the group. All participants then reconvene and take a verbal vote to ratify the selection of delegates."
How would a recount between two democrats work. Every subsequent count would increase the number of votes for both candidates. I suppose the winner would be determined by whoevers vote count was first to exceed the total population of the state.