Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s Economic Freedom Has Rapidly Declined Under Obama (from 6th most free to 11th)
Daily Signal ^ | January 31, 2016 | Anthony B. Kim

Posted on 02/01/2016 9:30:58 AM PST by Olog-hai

Millions of people around the world are emerging from poverty thanks to rising economic freedom. But by sharp contrast, America's economic freedom has been on a declining path over the past decade.

According to the 2016 Index of Economic Freedom, an annual publication by The Heritage Foundation, America's economic freedom has tumbled. With losses of economic freedom in eight of the past nine years, the U.S. has tied its worst score ever, wiping out a decade of progress.

The U.S. has fallen from the 6th freest economy in the world, when President Barack Obama took office, to 11th place in 2016. America's declining score in the index is closely related to rapidly rising government spending, subsidies, and bailouts. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: economicfreedom; liberalagenda; obama; socialism

1 posted on 02/01/2016 9:30:58 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It has, but it also declined under Bush too. The Welfare State is a lumbering beast that takes more and more and more. Unless you have a conservative in power who vigorously fights against it, it will expand. Under Bush, slowly, under Obama, quickly.


2 posted on 02/01/2016 9:33:22 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

I don’t think anyone was attempting to exonerate Obama’s predecessor. Liberals are liberals no matter the party label.


3 posted on 02/01/2016 9:34:38 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If I recall correctly this survey gives points for things we don’t want and things that destroy our economic freedom.

For example: Import tariffs if we had them protect our industry from predator countries like China. But this survey considers them bad.

It’s like saying personal freedom is low in America because the US has a strong military.


4 posted on 02/01/2016 9:49:02 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Young Americans have no idea what economic growth feels like.


5 posted on 02/01/2016 9:57:01 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Populism is what Populism does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

LOL! Not according to the lyin’ king. EVERYBODY has a job making a $100K minimum to hear him (yech!) speak.


6 posted on 02/01/2016 12:20:03 PM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Such are the consequences for defying the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.


7 posted on 02/01/2016 2:46:35 PM PST by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Economic freedom should be of direct importance to all Americans. As a consumer, employee, employer, or investor, Americans benefit directly from economic freedom.

Investors around the world would be smart to favor countries that have more economic freedom. America is now a less attractive place to invest than when we had more economic freedom.

Private sector investing is the key to prosperity. From the time George Washington paid off our national debt (much of it owed to foreigners) to the present, the United States has been a favorite place to invest. This is what has made America prosperous.

The steel industry, farm equipment, steel, railroads, oil, gasoline, automobiles, airplanes, electricity, personal computers, the internet, shale oil, etc. all owe their existence primarily to private sector investing. We generally got these things early and on a large scale because we were always one of the most free countries.

We took a giant step back with the Smoot-Hawley tariffs which caused the great depression. We take a step back with higher taxes and loads of regulation. We take a step forward when we cut taxes and deregulate.

Socialists turn to government as the key to prosperity. Modern day Peronistas turn to tariffs (also government). Unions turn to labor organizing, baseball bats, and forced unionization.

They may all mean well. But they are all mistaken. Mistaken policy leads to bad results regardless of intent.

Private sector investing is putting Americans back to work in the shale oil industry. More private sector investing can put everyone back to work. Less private sector investing can continue the slide to second or third world status, or quickly lead to another depression.

I know people want a silver bullet such as tariffs. They don’t work. Like it or not, the only way for us to become prosperous again is to earn it. Focus on the consumer, focus on the investor. If you make them happy, a lot more people will be hired: from Facebook, to oil, to automobiles, to farming, to barbers, painters, doctors, engineers, etc.


8 posted on 02/16/2016 5:01:34 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

With the Sixteenth Amendment in the way, the path back to tariffs (the way the federal government was funded in the past) is blocked, even if you get the regulation and corporate taxation out of the way. And there is also the deleterious effect of the Federal Reserve and all federal welfare programs including infrastructure.


9 posted on 02/16/2016 5:28:21 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

‘Indeed, as The Wall Street Journal recently summed it up succinctly, Obama is “a champion when it comes to limiting economic freedom, and American workers have the slow growth in jobs and wages to prove it.”


10 posted on 02/16/2016 6:13:27 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Doesn’t Trump promise tariffs on Mexican goods?


11 posted on 02/16/2016 6:14:10 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There is a good video at linked site.


12 posted on 02/16/2016 6:50:32 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Yes. And Japanese, and Chinese as well.


13 posted on 02/16/2016 7:13:20 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson