Posted on 01/28/2016 8:33:04 AM PST by Biggirl
An article in the Huffington Post this week proposes that Christians acknowledge Muhammadâs greatness and accept him as a prophet as a way to move forward in interreligious dialogue. Writer Craig Considine writes that he is a Christian with deep admiration for Muhammad, but doesnât convert because, although he was an extraordinary human being, Muhammad is not âthe man.â
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It this like the ‘peace’ of Communism...when everyone is either converted, driven underground, enslaved or DEAD?
The truth of the principle that one should turn the other cheek depends on the context. In a context where one's God given natural rights are being attacked or threatened, turning the other cheek would be a contradiction to the God given natural duty to preserve and protect natural rights.
Also, one of the main causes of the spread of evil in the world is the unwillingness to pronounce moral judgment and declare the mohammed was evil and should be condemned, because he advocated the assault on natural rights.
The Chrislam heresy is being preached from every hilltop it would seem.
Here it is to military action.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uomds1zjQ0
Someone needs to use that song about ISIS
Next step is for Huffpo to instruct Christians to acknowledge Mohammed to be the second Son of God, born in Mecca.
There is NO LOVE in Islam. It’s never mentioned, never commanded.
Neither is any form of charity, btw. Muslims are never told to aid or feed the poor.
In reality, Mohammad more closely resembles Hitler than any other historic figure, yet the left embraces Islam.
Their delusions are astounding.
Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. Are people so blind to the facts that they cannot see the future?
And yet, we seem to embrace Islam as a viable religion, to be protected by the 1st Amendment.
Why did we not protect the Nazi ideology during WWII?
We seem to enjoy living with cancer inside our national body.
Many prophets had flaws, but Mo is in a completely different league. It’s not just his personal flaws. His message sounds like the one who tempted Jesus in the wilderness, not like any of God’s real prophets.
Mooselimb belief #1
If you die fighting non-muslims for your moon god, you go direct to heaven. There, you have an eternity of cardinal pleasure.
This is a positive for thuggish, brutal, evil people.
Folks have thought about a workable solution for 1400 years.
We’re still looking for a solution to Ilam beliefs.
PS. Allan’s Snackbar (or whatever they shout before they chop off your head) is a declaration their moongod is better than all other God’s.
Mooselimbs need a belief adjustment
muhammad was a thief, a pedophile and a murderer. Not a model for Christians.
Prophet for Satan perhaps.
Another scholastic moonbat living in a teacher's lounge.
Hey Craig, admire this:
Their ‘prophet’ was a ravenous, murderous, pillaging and burning, enslaving, raping, merciless warlord. Those crusades by his murderous hordes took over great swaths of Christian lands.
Once he satisfied his lust for land and blood and power, he decided religion would be the way to keep his subjects in line, in a psychological way. So, kachinga! He becomes a prophet.
Christians then mounted their crusades to take back their lands.
This history is little known among most Americans, and you can blame our pubic school teachers.
I think can think that an earthworm is a canadian goose...it is not.
“What about John the Revelator?”
Never heard of him. Please tell me more. How could any CHRISTIAN accept the contradiction of a post-Christ prophet?
“Never heard of him.”
Really? Who wrote the last book in your copy of the New Testament?
“How could any CHRISTIAN accept the contradiction of a post-Christ prophet?”
What contradiction exactly?
Even with all that under his belt, he’s still an idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.