Posted on 01/27/2016 11:10:48 AM PST by ru4liberty
Trump was able to keep this film from coming to light when it was filmed 25 years ago. It's not hard to see why he wanted it kept under wraps. It shows what an unprincipled, dishonest, cruel, opportunistic individual he is.
This film will require an investment of your time (1 hour 20 minutes). That doesn't seem like an unreasonable amount of time to investigate someone who aspires to be the president of the United States. I even recommend that you view it twice (a few days apart) so that you will pick up on some of the things you might have missed the first time. There's a lot to take in.
Fine. I'll put you down for someone who prefers ignorance over a well informed decision.
Two questions: (1) If it's legally determined that Cruz is eligible to run, will you vote for him in the primary? In the general? (2) What candidate(s) would you be willing to vote for the in general if Trump is not the nominee?
Finally, based on some of the posts to this and other threads, it's becoming increasingly difficult to be convinced that Trump's 5th Avenue remark was actually a joke as has been claimed.
Why did the documentary get canned? Could it be because it had false information and they did not want to get sued?
I think that is likely. I don’t know who made it or why so I don’t know their agenda. I’m not watching it.
I think that is likely. I don't know who made it or why so I don't know their agenda. I'm not watching it.
I see. So you don't have enough confidence in your ability to discern fact from fiction to view it. How well this speaks of the typical Trump voter. It's so like 8 years ago when another candidate who was being swooned over had groupies who didn't want to hear anything negative about him.
You have determined that you have sized up the content of the film plus the reason it was quashed which would indicate that you believe you have certain clairvoyant talents. I submit to you that it's cowardice, not clairvoyance, that keeps you from viewing it.
I have found a common thread running through (almost) all Trump supporters -- they are curiously uncurious regarding anything that might put Trump in a less-than-flattering light. And why should they have to do so, really? After all, this is only the position of the president of the United State's we're talking about. Why should we be bothered that the man has a history of making promises he can't or won't keep? Or that he's given to exaggeration when the simple truth should suffice? He means well. Isn't that all that really matters?
This was uploaded last fall, not at the “last minute.” If I’d found it then, I would have posted it then. I just now found it, so this is when I posted it. Capiche?
“So what?” Is that seriously your question? I suppose it doesn’t matter if any old candidate will do. But on a board where constitutional conservatism has been the sought-after standard for almost 20 years, it’s very troubling when the members are suddenly willing to settle for less. Much, much less.
Reading and understanding policy objectives shows someones ignorance? You use insults and opinion and you think that is well informed? You got your head up your you know what where the sun don’t shine mr rude!
Answer to question number (1) no I will not, I will stick with Trump to end of primary. (2) I will vote for any candidate to keep Hilliary or Sanders out of WH, some will require longer nose holding than others and all of them other than Trump I will have to hold my nose.
Same questions to you: (1) Will you vote for Trump in primary if it is determined Ted is not eligible to run or he has no chance of winning nomination? (2) what candidates other than Cruz would you be willing to vote for in general?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.