Posted on 01/27/2016 8:04:02 AM PST by xzins
Full Title:
GUT WRENCHING: Eye Witness Claims in Detailed Interview that #OregonStandoff Protestor Robert "LaVoy" Finicum Was Executed by FBI (VIDEO)
Join THE true Liberty Movement alternative to Facebook...set up a FREE social profile now at the new Grassfire.com! CLICK HERE TO GET STARTED.
Last night news broke that #OregonStandoff Spokesperson Robert "LaVoy" Finicum was shot and killed during a federal traffic stop near Burns, Oregon. In the hours following the shooting reports started coming out suggesting it may very well be possible Finicum had his hands up and did not present a weapon, nor did he attempt to cause harm to agents.
The reports asserting this included claims there was a witness or witnesses in the vehicle who watched the entire event unfold. But until now we hadn’t heard from those witnesses publicly.
Now one of the witnesses has completed a gut-wrenching interview in which she says FBI agents fired an estimated 120 rounds at Finicum and his vehicle, six of which entered his body.
Here's more from the video page.
This is breaking, first-hand, eyewitness audio testimony of how LaVoy Finicum was killed by federal agents on January 26, 2016. The young lady's voice that you're going to hear was in the car with LaVoy, Ryan Payne, Ryan Bundy, and Shawna Cox.
The federal agents fired the first and only shots, according to this testimony. Finicum had his hands in the air when he was shot.
You're going to likely see video testimony from this young lady in the near future. Please pray for this whole situation. This is a tragic thing that didn't have to happen had cooler heads prevailed.
Full video interview below.
“Accuracy must not be a part of FBI training if this is true.”
After listening to the whole tape, and assuming the accuracy of the witness’ perceptions, this makes sense.
The FBI and whatever else organization could easily have killed all of these people at any time once they stopped the vehicle. They could have been shot to bits like Bonnie and Clyde.
Most of these people were not shot because fedzilla did not want them dead. This was an example. This was an act of State terrorism. The laser targeting, the car shot to bits and shot all around the passengers was to drive home their vulnerability. At least one had to die to prove the government’s willingness and resolve to execute dissidents, but the others were intended to be terrorized. They will mostly be let free to carry the story home. This is meant to intimidate and suppress dissenters. This is much more subtle and strategic than the federal atrocities at Ruby Ridge and Waco.
That is how I read it, anyway. Willing to hear other theories which account for this bizarre sequence of events.
Guessing the “bikers got what they deserved at Waco” Hussein Head bootlickers will be quite satisfied with Big Media’s version of this as well.
I would say that the vast majority of police personnel hold a VERY conservative worldview. Of course, under federal threat, departments have been FORCED to accept sub-par candidates with leftist, anarchist penchants over the past 3 or 4 decades. Otherwise, Obama's "army" in police uniform would be virtually nill.
I’m not at all sympathetic with the govt but I don’t give this story of the shooting any credence either.
I’ll wait.
He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.
Was he one of the ones in the video destroying utility security cameras?
“That is how I read it, anyway. “
Very good points you mention. I had not thought of it that way.
Actually. The two instances may turn out to be very similar.
(Except Finnicum was not a low-life street thug who had just committed a strong arm robbery — or anything close thereto)
“I wonder how many police will kill civilians for Obama”
Waco II proved that a lot will.
We’ve heard plenty of cases of someone being shot by the cops followed by stories that they were trying to surrender with their hands up. Are there any pictures that would settle the matter one way or the other?
Ad hominem. Impressive.
He destroyed security cameras? Well, then execute him.
Are you serious. A cop shoots a kid trying to take his gun that had just robbed a store and the President gets involved. Hands up don’t shoot, ring a bell?
“He died as a consequence of his own actions. That is sad.
Was he one of the ones in the video destroying utility security cameras?”
You are saying destruction of property should carry a death sentence with NO charges or trial? Seriously?
White lives don’t matter.
The eyewitnesses in the Fergusen case were what proved the claim of hands up don’t shoot to be true. That and forensic evidence.
There is no reason to think the same would not be true here.
There are a variety of details. All can be checked for accuracy, as can the shots in the body.
Good to see you out there again ... been a long time my friend.
After looking at the video that was in the thread you linked I have concluded that you are in fact correct. These people were being very silly.
The Cameras are indeed attached to a pole that has multiple heavy conductors running to it. The Cameras are clearly marked as part of a SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system.
What we have here are people who desperately want to believe there is a massive conspiracy controlling the government and that the government is intent on spying on them. (Like they couldn't do it with satellites.)
I am very familiar with the type. They imagine boogie men behind every bush. Nothing is what it seems, and everything points to government conspiracy.
They espouse a severe form of "confirmation bias." Everything they see is looked at in such a way as to confirm the theory that they already wish to believe.
This is the sort of hot-head, knee jerk, reactionary behavior that hurts rather than helps their cause.
The important thing seems to be to always believe Big Media headlines, especially when there is no obvious, overt political connection.
These are two totally different situations. You don't come across very well when you call anyone who disagrees with you regarding the biker incident a "Hussein Head bootlicker."
CORRECTION: PROVVD TO BE FALSE
The eyewitnesses in the Fergusen case were what proved the claim of hands up don’t shoot to be FALSE. That and forensic evidence.
There is no reason to think the same would not be true here.
There are a variety of details. All can be checked for accuracy, as can the shots in the body.
But,that means we get a green light also!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.