let me get this straight...
the sellers were indicted for selling the parts, but the “fake” buyers were indicted for pretending to want to buy them?
um... if they are guilty of buying... they someone is guilty of selling. Am I missing something here?
I meant the sellers were not indicted.
From what I understand, the grand jury was not to consider any charges against those who were illegally taped; IE: They couldn’t indict those who were selling the baby organs as they were recorded with a hidden camera without their knowledge.
Whereas the fake buyer had full knowledge they were being recorded and thus the tapes could be considered evidence against them.
Of course, now it is being reported across social media as evidence that the tapes were ‘faked’ - which I’ve gotta admit, that’s a fascinating concept, someone being indicted for making a fictional video...
My daughter was absolutely sure this was the case until I asked her: then what were they indicted for? You or I could make a fictional movie about selling body parts, and no grand jury would convene to examine it. No crime could have been committed in a fake tape.
And then she paled, realizing that all of those tapes were absolutely real.
Obama can pardon 65 terrorists who have committed or plotted mass murder of Americans, but two Oregon ranchers sit in Federal prison for protecting their land. And at the same time while this political indictment against moral activists is perpetrated against video makers, Hilary Clinton is not only walking free, she is running for President!
What the hell is going on here?
Yes, TexasFreeper 2009, you are missing something. The Orwellian dimension. War is Peace, Love is Hate,etc. etc.