Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck

They wanted to conserve self government and keep government limited. Conservatism of that type was considered radical at the time (and still is today).


45 posted on 01/25/2016 5:36:20 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
They wanted to conserve self government and keep government limited.

Actually it was the Tories or Loyalists who wanted to keep their Colonial form of limited self government...not the radicals at Lexington and Concord.

Conservatives generally speaking are not in the forefront of radical change.

72 posted on 01/25/2016 7:08:16 PM PST by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson