Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dp0622

Even the governments own information will admit ethanol contains about 2/3 of the energy of gasoline. With 10% ethanol that translates to about 3-4% worse mileage.

Ethanol also attracts and absorbs moisture like any alcohol that can cause corrosion and deterioration of internal parts susceptible to moisture. It eats some traditional tubing, gaskets, seals, etc. It is particularly bad for 2 cycle engines. I’ve had to learn how to completely rebuild 2 cycle carburetors and have had to do it for every 2 cycle engine I’ve got.

The real profiteers on corn ethanol as a gasoline additive are the granary and silo operators as the subsidy recipients, IMO. The farmer gets the benefit of stable and/or modestly increased price for his corn.

Ethanol gas additive only benefits those green zealots who would have us all riding horses (until the PETA dipshits stop that).


11 posted on 01/25/2016 3:50:13 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

that’s a pretty strong case.

i’m open minded. hoping for a scientific response explaining why it’s a good thing for the subsidy to be supported by a candidate.

even an overpoweringly good economic reason would suffice.

not thrilled about it damaging my car though


14 posted on 01/25/2016 4:19:59 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson