Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis 'will not destroy the US shale industry'
The Telegraph ^ | January 24, 2016 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor, Davos

Posted on 01/24/2016 11:17:44 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

To all oil-producing countries that are leftist aholes: Bwaahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Embrace the suck.


21 posted on 01/25/2016 8:28:59 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Riiiiiiiiiiiight.


22 posted on 01/25/2016 8:29:13 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff

According Airliners.net Iran is currently on an airliner buying binge. They have to replace the aging airlines they flew for years under the sanctions. Reports are they will immediately buy 127 Airbus airliners (8 A-380, 16 A-350). Many will be used airliners until new can be delivered. Reportedly A320 and A340.

It also said the Iranians are buying 580 airliners in the next 10 years.

They will also probably be looking to China or Russia to buy military aircraft to replace aging F-14 fighters.

Probably from the $150 billion Obama gave them back of sanctioned money.


23 posted on 01/25/2016 8:32:26 AM PST by r_barton (We the People of the United States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

no, because they can’t, but mostly because it is not in their national interest


24 posted on 01/25/2016 8:37:56 AM PST by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: r_barton

Airliners make nice big drones.


25 posted on 01/25/2016 8:42:08 AM PST by cookcounty ("I was a Democrat until I learned to count" --Maine Gov. Paul LePage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

They currently have only about 200 airliners in all of Iran. So something is going on. The airliner was the weapon in 9/11.


26 posted on 01/25/2016 8:45:05 AM PST by r_barton (We the People of the United States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: r_barton

They are upgrading their fleet. $150 billion will let you do these things. Iran is ordering 8 A-380’s. Wow. This is the biggest and nicest plane available.


27 posted on 01/25/2016 8:54:46 AM PST by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Energy guru Daniel Yergin says rich investors have $60bn war chest to buy up distressed fracking assets after Opec war of attrition"

Well, step right up, then, rich investors. Throw your junk investments/debt down the hole. That will be good for a few weeks and a laugh.


28 posted on 01/25/2016 11:34:01 AM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is one twisted propagandist, by the way. In regards to the Greek debt problems, he blamed Germany for refusing to shovel more money to Greece.


29 posted on 01/25/2016 11:38:14 AM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Funny, I haven’t seen an article on “peak Oil” for a while.


30 posted on 01/25/2016 6:37:43 PM PST by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Ok, agreed, “shutter” is the wrong term / way to look at it. But, the point is, there is a LOT of oil now available at moderate cost in relatively short time frames (under a year), all over the planet. The odds that, barring a major war, oil could go back up over $100 / barrel for over a year (in 2016 dollars), anytime in the next, oh, 20 years or so, seem pretty low.

Granted, Obama HAS set the world up for a major war in the next generation or so, with the likelihood of significant numbers of nukes involved increasing with time...


31 posted on 01/25/2016 7:34:20 PM PST by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
In order to mobilize the people and equipment needed to nave another boom, especially when some who overextended toward the bust are either scratching or selling out for pennies on the dollar to get flush (I am speaking of the myriad service companies involved, not the oil companies, for the most part), and their bankers who will be slow to loan money to get things going, I believe the price will be over 80 for a year before widespread new drilling occurs.

Yes, we know where the oil is, but getting it out of the ground is a business enterprise and it has to make a profit.

In the meantime, an army of oil workers is idle or getting settled in new and different jobs which they might not want to leave, and that doesn't keep well. The longer equipment sits idle, the more it costs to get it going again, and it costs money every day it sits, in depreciation and degradation. Because of the size of the equipment, it is cost-prohibitive to store much of it inside, and it suffers from sitting idle.

Nope, You won't see a rush to the barricades unless there is very good reason to believe that oil prices will be at a level for a time period long enough to justify the mobilization and investment needed to start drilling wells on a widespread basis.

There will be some continued drilling by some of the bigger and better funded players, but that is a small fraction of what it was. (Presently, in this area the rig count is less than 25% of what it was at the peak.)

With the decline rate in horizontal wells, I expect oil will be back over $50 in a year, and over $80 in three. Unless, of course, the depression deepens and people have no place to drive.

As for setting the stage for another World War, we are rapidly approaching that point. That nuclear proliferation into the hands of fanatical governments has been fostered by the current government is amazing to me, especially when they seem so 'concerned' about American Christians owning black rifles (because somehow that is allegedly dangerous).

Of course, that might change the picture entirely, as far as oil is concerned.

32 posted on 01/25/2016 7:52:38 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Millions of barrels of oil / day. As best as I’ve been able to research, Saudi is presently producing a bit over 10 million barrels per day (not including nat. gas liquids and so on) and has about 2.5 million barrels / day reserve capacity. Their output has increased a little over the past few years, but demand has increased more.

US production (esp. when natural gas is included) has climbed vigorously:

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=20692


33 posted on 01/25/2016 7:58:11 PM PST by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Well, we are partially agreed. I still look at how quickly (in relative terms) the recent US capacity came online (with largely equipment that had to be built new, not “restored to serviceable condition”, and add in the overseas suppliers desperate for cash, and the prospect of yet lower production costs. To me, even with a US production fall, this adds up to a gradual recovery to around $50 / barrel, maybe a bit more, and then somewhat of a “hold” there for a good while. The average price “should” be set by the “swing” costs in the US, but the overseas players will be important too. So, we shall see. You may yet be right...

As for a depression, well, worldwide, the future economy is not looking so good at present, is it? (It’s a pretty lousy way to get to low energy prices!)

By “major war”, I don’t think it will be a World War, though it could be. IMO, some sort of regional conflict with “several” to maybe 100 nukes tossed about by parties like Iran, Saudi / Pakistan, maybe Israel gets dragged into it, is increasingly likely — and that’s pretty bad! :-(


34 posted on 01/25/2016 8:24:08 PM PST by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
Oil wells don't generally 'hold', at least not until late in life when their production is significantly reduced from their IP. Horizontal wells in tight formations like the Bakken lose about 80% of their production rate in the first three years, and while the decline is not as sharp from there, it continues at a lesser rate.

So the curves of demand and supply will cross out there somewhere, and where, when, and how steep the curves are will determine the next price peak.

As for 10 years, well, not exactly. I worked my first horizontal well in 1990, and continued to work horizontal wells (and some vertical exploration wells) until I worked my first Bakken horizontal well in 2001.

We did a lot of experimenting with well geometry, reentry laterals, different drilling fluids and tools, it was a very interesting time. The production guys developed completion techniques including multistage fracs.

The Bakken became national news in 2006-2008, and it really boomed from there.

This year the rig count is down 75% from the high.

The first wells were not drilled with new rigs. In fact, while there were some new rigs being built, old rigs were retrofitted for walking to operate within the pad well concept, especially after the Three Forks Formation (the rock formation below the Bakken) proved to be a producer, too.

The last of the retrofitted rigs I worked on had been released by may of last year, although there were others.

But now, there are specialized rigs designed to move from wellhead to wellhead on a multiwell pad, with no wells to drill.

The other aspect will be less obvious to you, but far more so to me.

While there are always some roaring young lions in the industry, the majority of the hands that were in supervisory positions as Wellsite Geologists, Company Hands, Directional Drillers and Toolpushers were leftovers from the last boom. Guys ranging in age from their 40s to their 70s. In 10 years you are going to lose a lot of those people. The longer it takes, the harder it will be because the personnel won't be there to make it happen.

Mining will experience the same phenomenon and has to some degree, as has the timber industry.

The danger of shutting down extractive industries and then trying to turn them back on is that the people, equipment, and know-how are perishable.

At some point you end up reinventing the wheel.

Back to the War. I don't see any of those interests (and others) as proxies or otherwise, taking on 'the little satan' without taking on 'the big satan'. Aside from that, alliances will probably serve much the same purpose as those in Europe before WW1 did to pull nation after nation into a conflict that essentially was sparked by the shooting of an Archduke in an obscure country. Little straws break camel's backs.

35 posted on 01/25/2016 9:39:38 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson