Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Napolitano: Case Against Hillary 'Overwhelming, Damning and, from Her Perspective, Grave'
PJ Media ^ | 01/21/2016 | Debra Heine

Posted on 01/21/2016 10:12:48 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Reacting to the latest bombshell revelations about Hillary Clinton's email arrangement, Judge Andrew Napolitano said on The Kelly File Wednesday night that Clinton should be lawyering up, because "the case against her is overwhelming, damning and, from her perspective, grave."

Mrs. Clinton, on the other hand, continues to insist that the latest allegations about her emails while secretary of State change "nothing." During a Wednesday interview with NPR, she said, "I'm just going to leave it up to the professionals at the Justice Department, because nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified."

Via Politico:

"As the State Department has confirmed, I never sent or received any material marked classified, and that hasn't changed in all of these months," she said. "This, seems to me, to be, you know, another effort to inject this into the campaign. It's another leak," she said in an echo of a charge her spokesman Brian Fallon made on CNN Wednesday morning.

On Fox News' Special Report last night, Charles Krauthammer said that he was "shocked by the brazenness" of Hillary Clinton's latest denial of wrongdoing, noting that the Obama-appointed inspector general of the intelligence community had confirmed that Clinton sent emails that were more highly classified than "top secret."

Journalist Stephen Hayes said he spoke with three national security lawyers who deal with this sort of thing for a living, and they all said that without exception there's no question this person would have lost her clearances if this were any other employee. "She probably would have lost her job, and possibly already been indicted," Hayes said.

Later on The Kelly File, Judge Napolitano told Megyn Kelly that Clinton should think about lawyering up. "Mrs. Clinton should be consulting very high-powered, national security criminal defense lawyers," Judge Napolitano said, explaining that lawyers with national security clearances would be able to see the evidence against her.

He added that "the case against her is overwhelming, damning and, from her perspective, grave." Napolitano charged that when Clinton laughs the serious issue off, "she's effectively mocking the 100 FBI agents that are investigating." The judge explained that Clinton's assertion that she never sent or received anything marked "classified" is merely a word game, because no intelligence is ever marked "classified."

"It is marked 'confidential,' 'secret,' 'top secret,'" Judge Napolitano said. "Under 'top secret,' there are four sub-markings, the most sensitive of which is this Select Access Privilege (SAP), which is what two dozen of her emails had on there."

Host Megyn Kelly wondered if the emails in question really are all that sensitive. Napolitano conceded that some of her classified emails might not be, but not the ones that are classified in the "SAP" category.

"That is the highest level of classification," he said. "Do you know what type of information in there? The name of moles, black ops, secret programs that the government wants to deny the existence of. For her to have put that on an open server while she was secretary of State is absolutely grossly negligent and must be the basis for an indictment."



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: emailscandal; hillary; napolitano
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 01/21/2016 10:12:48 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And, if and when it gets “referred” to AG lynch, proceeding to prosecute will be denied. The IG can have all the damning evidence he wants but if the “right” people don’t feel it necessary to prosecute, game over.


2 posted on 01/21/2016 10:15:31 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Some Lawmakers investigating her aren’t allowed to view the docs but any teenager hacker could gain access to them.

It really is incredible.


3 posted on 01/21/2016 10:15:48 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

TS/SAP on a private server open to the internet?

That’s literally incomprehensible.

It’s cigarette and blindfold time.


4 posted on 01/21/2016 10:16:19 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

She is in a catch 22. Trump won’t pardon her. She needs to go down now to get an Obama pardon


5 posted on 01/21/2016 10:16:25 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillary’s a case of the old, “Give ‘em enough rope and they’ll hang themselves.” The best thing to keep her from the Presidency was to make her Secretary of State.


6 posted on 01/21/2016 10:16:35 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Hillary s gang is trying to introduce a new narrative.

That Hillary didn t knowingly receive or send any confidential emails. That along with the revelation that Petraeus faces new scrutiny and punishment after already copping a plea is a good indication of where this is going to go. I.E Nowhere.

7 posted on 01/21/2016 10:17:05 AM PST by Fhios (Just say no to the apostrophe on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I will fall down in a deadshock if she gets indicted.


8 posted on 01/21/2016 10:17:21 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has Nappy ever been right about anything?


9 posted on 01/21/2016 10:18:06 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rush was mentioning that this info was also shared with servers in the Clinton Foundation.


10 posted on 01/21/2016 10:18:45 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Mrs. Clinton should be consulting very high-powered, national security criminal defense lawyers,"

Checking the Grand Junction Yellow Pages, I do not see a section for "Attorneys—National Security Criminal Defense." Is there such a section in the D.C. Yellow Pages?

11 posted on 01/21/2016 10:23:29 AM PST by snarkpup ("The Democratic party's policies are like a warm blanket of asbestos." - Crystal Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Her Royal Hipness will never be prosecuted. They will issue a finding that it is not a crime. She gets a pass, because she is rich and powerful. She has nothing to worry about.


12 posted on 01/21/2016 10:27:30 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

She is in a catch 22. Trump won’t pardon her. She needs to go down now to get an Obama pardon


Good point.

Hitlery is between a Barack and a hard place.


13 posted on 01/21/2016 10:28:48 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Clintons are releasing 500 Trump documents, probably thinking that she may have the lead if she gets the dirt out first.

This lady is clueless and oblivious to the consequences of her own evil ways.

Question is what will Obama do when faced with the fact that Hillary's chances to even make it to the DNC convention intact is next to zero and his entire presidency will fall to whomever the RNC puts up as a candidate?

14 posted on 01/21/2016 10:29:17 AM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios
He added that "the case against her is overwhelming, damning and, from her perspective, grave." Napolitano charged that when Clinton laughs the serious issue off, "she's effectively mocking the 100 FBI agents that are investigating." The judge explained that Clinton's assertion that she never sent or received anything marked "classified" is merely a word game, because no intelligence is ever marked "classified".

"

15 posted on 01/21/2016 10:29:41 AM PST by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am not the least bit excited about these developments. She could be caught selling missile systems to communists and nothing would happen. She could rape several women and nothing would happen. She can continue lying and nothing will happen. Obama will not let Hillary go down.(ehem)... No one else can run with Obama’s purse to bring about the glorious revolution.


16 posted on 01/21/2016 10:31:26 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I disagree with ya...respectfully.

I believe she’z finally stepped in it. Remember, the Atty. General can be impeached.

This one is too big. I feel evidence will also show her server was also compromised.

17 posted on 01/21/2016 10:31:37 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“...nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified.”

And in response, I reiterate: You were a member of the National Security Council (not the NSC Staff); held the highest clearance and accesses available; signed non-disclosure agreements that included requirements for the handling of classified information; and you were one of a handful of government officials with Original Classification Authority, so you were (or should have been) familiar with basic classification guidelines. Bottom line: Whether the information in those emails was marked CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, TOP SECRET and has handling caveats or not makes no difference whatsoever. For probably the first time in your life, you and you alone are responsible.

The “My dog ate my classification manual” defense won’t work for you. To coin a phrase, “That dog don’t hunt.”


18 posted on 01/21/2016 10:34:32 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nice of Megyn Kelly to give Hillary a pass.


19 posted on 01/21/2016 10:34:48 AM PST by Carnac the Magnificent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

Yes, there are. Except you don t consult with them. They re assigned to you. They are payed very well.

Clinton is going to use Kendall, but I think he s going to be charged and convicted also. He may drop Hillary if she is indicted.


20 posted on 01/21/2016 10:36:06 AM PST by Fhios (Just say no to the apostrophe on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson