Posted on 01/19/2016 11:30:34 AM PST by Enlightened1
Ted Cruz's Amazing Stances on Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment from 2011 to 2015.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Truly AMAZING!!!!
He’s also for original framer’s intent... Unless it’s the meaning of natural born citizen.
That is unbelievable. I just don’t trust him anymore. What does he really stand for?
he stands for whatever advances his ambition, as always
Ted Cruz was born on December 22nd. 1970. At this time, his citizenship was defined by the Canadian Citizenship Act of 1947.
The Canadian Citizenship Act of 1947 clearly states that: A person born after the commencement of this act is a Natural Born Citizen: (a)if he is born in Canada or on a Canadian ship.
Ted Cruz was a Canadian anchor baby.
Yep, sure seems to be conflicting stances. He accused Trump of the same things. SMH.
Cruz on Natural Born Citizenship:
http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams300.htm
I can't wait to find out how the Cruzers try to slime there way out of this one. The 2011 statement is so forceful, Cruz can't get away with not recalling it.
I keep sayin' it. This is feeling more like GWB's first campaign 16 years ago, every day. Say what we Constitutional Conservatives wanted to hear, then trash sovereignty in office.
Cruz vs. Cruz...an epic debate!
That Calgary Stampeders jersey gives him away every time.
I’ve always found these rare epiphanies amusing. Harvard educated, doesn’t know that the 14th amendment includes “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language. Levin is likewise an extreme latecomer to this issue. Lord help us.
Fluidity of mind... Useful, yes?
Easy, remember this is a edited video, in the 2011 clip he is talking about birthright citizenship according to the 14th amendment, which talks about legal immigrants birthright. In the 2015 clip he’s talking about illegal immigrants (Anchor Babies)
Please post the full unedited video or transcript for both interviews, so it can show the full context
Guess, what, neither one is perfect, one of them is going to be the nominee, I'm fine with either.
Unless you prefer Hillary, which I don't believe you do.
Cruz merely says what is expedient at the time. Bought and paid for.
That's strange. Most people try to never advance their ambition.
Take Trump, for example. He always tries to negotiate a deal in which he loses. Right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.