Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barney Frank Praises Ted Cruz For Position On Gay Marriage (2014)
http://www.realclearpolitics.com ^ | October 30, 2014

Posted on 01/19/2016 10:40:17 AM PST by NKP_Vet

Former Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) praised Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for his view on gay marriage on Thursday's broadcast of CNBC's Squawk Box. Cruz appeared on the show prior to Frank and said though he believes marriage is between one man and one woman, that it is up to each state to decide what their marriage law should be.

"I support the Constitution letting each state decide each marriage law consistent with the values of their citizens," Cruz said. "If the citizens of California decide they want to allow gay marriage, that's a decision for them."

Barney Frank said Cruz's comments represent an "evolution" of how gay marriage is viewed in the U.S.

"Ted Cruz is one of the most conservative people in American politics. He just made a very important statement that you quoted, that you ran on the air, which he said if a state wants to have same-sex marriage, that's okay," Frank said. "So even Ted Cruz's position, as I said he's the leader of the right in America, he represents an evolution in favor of allowing same-sex marriage."

"It's even more vindication that the country is moving when someone on the right takes that position," Frank said.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; cruz; homosexualagenda; pervert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
So Bwarney Frank likes Ted Cruz's position on sodomite "marriage". Will Cruz is wrong. The only thing that will stop sodomite "marriage" is a Constitution amendment. Saying you're OK with states deciding it is crazy and I don't care who the politician is. This sodomy garbage needs to be stopped dead in it's tracks but it will never happen because of republicans that refuse to ask for a Constitution amendment, led by RINO Boehner and McConnell.
1 posted on 01/19/2016 10:40:17 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Who new Franks respects the constitution?


2 posted on 01/19/2016 10:43:17 AM PST by libbylu (Trump's supporters have the same brain disease as Hillary's supporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Ted’s problem is...that ship has already sailed. The USSC has ruled.


3 posted on 01/19/2016 10:44:22 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

4 posted on 01/19/2016 10:44:37 AM PST by South40 ("One of the reasons I like Ted Cruz so much, is that he's not controversial," ~Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I remember his battles with Dick Armey.


5 posted on 01/19/2016 10:44:58 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Barney Frank said Cruz's comments represent an "evolution" of how gay marriage is viewed in the U.S.

No Bwaney, Cruz is saying States rights in ANY matter should super-cede Federal mandates.

IOW, Get the Federal Government off our backs!

6 posted on 01/19/2016 10:45:40 AM PST by PROCON (Proud CRUZader!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Barney's been wearing that belt around his neck a little too tight.

 

It's cut off the oxygen to his brain.

7 posted on 01/19/2016 10:45:51 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

ROFLMAO!!!!

Oh yeah I’m sure Cruz’s numbers will go up now knowing Barney Frank praises him.

LOL!


8 posted on 01/19/2016 10:45:51 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I do believe that Cruz thinks it a state issue now (since it’s not in the CURRENT constitution). That is not at variance with it becoming a “federal” issue if the US Constitution is revised. The two positions are not mutually contradictory.

You do realize that Barney Frank is simply attempting to wound Ted Cruz with his remarks...don’t you?


9 posted on 01/19/2016 10:46:04 AM PST by House Atreides (Cruzin' [BUT NO LONGER Trumping'] or losin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

So Barney BJ was a proponent of Proposition 8?


10 posted on 01/19/2016 10:46:28 AM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I like Ted Cruz, but on this issue I like Rick Santorum better. He has been both right and consistent over many years. It’s worth noting that Barney Frank isn’t praising Rick.


11 posted on 01/19/2016 10:47:03 AM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands (Conservative 2016!! The Dole, H.W. Bush, McCain, Romney experiment has failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Donald Trump: “You have to go with it. The decision’s been made, and that is the law of the land,”


12 posted on 01/19/2016 10:48:13 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The Tenth Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.

............

Ratified in 1791, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution embodies the general principles of Federalism in a republican form of government. The Constitution specifies the parameters of authority that may be exercised by the three branches of the federal government: executive, legislative, and judicial. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers that are not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, except for those powers that states are constitutionally forbidden from exercising.

For example, nowhere in the federal Constitution is Congress given authority to regulate local matters concerning the health, safety, and morality of state residents. Known as police powers, such authority is reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. Conversely, no state may enter into a treaty with a foreign government because such agreements are prohibited by the plain language of Article I to the Constitution.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Tenth+Amendment


13 posted on 01/19/2016 10:48:43 AM PST by justlittleoleme (Cruz or Lose. Trump is a progressive populist liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Cruz appeared on the show prior to Frank and said though he believes marriage is between one man and one woman, that it is up to each state to decide what their marriage law should be.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I’d feel much better about Ted if he stressed the fact that God created marriage as between one man and one woman.


14 posted on 01/19/2016 10:49:21 AM PST by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

This should really give Ted a boost. Having a former congressional felcher endorse anyone is a real source of coprophilic pride fit for the next parade.


15 posted on 01/19/2016 10:49:46 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

From a purely constitutional POV Cruz is right. And the SCOTUS is dad wrong.


16 posted on 01/19/2016 10:51:34 AM PST by NRx (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
The only thing that will stop sodomite "marriage" is a Constitution amendment. Saying you're OK with states deciding it is crazy and I don't care who the politician is.

You do realize that Trump is fine with SSM, and doesn't even think the issue should be returned to the states, but that SSM is now "the law of the land", right? Cruz is correct with regard to the Constitutional principles. If you can change the Constitution via an amendment, great. I would even support that effort, and I'm sure Cruz would as well. But until the Constitution is changed, the correct Constitutional answer is that marriage is a state issue, not a federal one.

17 posted on 01/19/2016 10:51:39 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Wow that is like an endorsement from hell. People acted like Jesse’s James endorsement of Trump was bad, this is way worse.


18 posted on 01/19/2016 10:52:20 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

dad=dead*

Proof reading is my friend...


19 posted on 01/19/2016 10:52:34 AM PST by NRx (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I forgot to give the typical Trump Fan response.. this was from 2014. Old News.


20 posted on 01/19/2016 10:54:20 AM PST by justlittleoleme (Cruz or Lose. Trump is a progressive populist liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson