David Brooks should be home ironing his pants.
Cruz is not my number one pick, but this is just a baseless hit piece.
The devil, you say, eh Brooks? Must live on a cave on Easter Island. Communicates to Cruz through one of those giant heads.
No better endorsement than this! Go Cruz!
They fear him and Trump because they know the minute either of the two gets elected, they and their quisling so-called conservative ilk cease to exist as a viable mouthpiece for elitist Republicanism.
It is real easy to be scandal free when you have Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch.
As far as they are concerned the only thing that matters in a criminal trial is the letter behind your name; (D).
Maybe Brooks would like Cruz if Cruz had better creases on his pant legs.
Cruz needs to perform ‘RINOplasty’ on the GOPe
I giggled all through this ludicrous Times essay.
Brooks’ vehemence makes me wonder if Cruz has said something against accepting gayness as 100% normal agenda. I don’t say this as a cheap smear — his gender issues seem to be at the heart of Brooks’ mixed relationship with conservatism.
Go along, and get along.... [with the liberal elites].
David has acknowledged numerous times this as a major character flaw that he is continually fighting against and still it happens...
I never waste my time listening to NPR or the statist drivel that passes for news on PBS
Brooks is one of the most dangerous people out there. He convinces liberal New York Times readers that they are making a conservative choice when they are picking the most demonic of traitors.
Media types who are straight-out hateful are not nearly as dangerous.
It’s time for many of these so called journalists to leave the business.
Brooks is another Jewish Canadian, like David Frum. Both are fixtures at NPR, as the “guest conseravtives”. Both are less supportive of Israel than Senator Cruz. Brooks would be an odd choice to select to reflect on the Christianity of Sen. Cruz.
Brooks was a senior at the same college I attended when I was a Freshman. We likely had some of the same teachers. So, if he should decide to “dismiss his [Cruz’] followers as the ‘poor, uneducated and easy-to-command’ types.” I’ll be happy to offer myself as a counter-example.
David Brooks is a pillow-biter.
Oy.