I'll only comment on the hypocrisy in the mainstream media, which has treated the Cruz issue seriously with well-researched articles and published opinions from learned scholars of constitutional law, whereas with Obama it was strictly ridicule. But the fact remains, Cruz isn't eligible.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Yep. Citizen, not Nat. Born.
2 posted on
01/12/2016 10:11:26 AM PST by
moehoward
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Hope you’re wearing Nomex!
3 posted on
01/12/2016 10:13:17 AM PST by
bigbob
("Victorious warriors win first ande then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
So Wait, let me get this straight. Two Mexicans can sneak across the border, Zero Percent American in any way.
Punch out a baby 400 Feet in Texas and that Kid is a 100% American entitled to all our rights and benefits?
But An American Citizen who is in another country and has a baby, THAT baby isn't an American Citizen? Even if he was born to an American?
WTF kind of sense does that make!?
Oh Wait it doesn't because Ted Cruz IS an American Citizen through and through.
4 posted on
01/12/2016 10:13:26 AM PST by
KC_Lion
(The fences are going up all over Europe. We shall not see them down again in our lifetime.)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Good thing he can sit on SCOTUS.
5 posted on
01/12/2016 10:14:16 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: Behind the Blue Wall; All
I think Cruz falls into the "eligible" category as do all children of American citizens do if those children happen to be born in a foreign country.
I ONLY know this because there WERE pregnant American women in the KSA who gave birth there too. Their children were considered U.S. citizens.
Of course, maybe the laws have changed.
To: Behind the Blue Wall
"Cruz was naturalized at birth" but not natural born?
Is this like a natural partial birth abortion?
WaPo. Nuff said.
9 posted on
01/12/2016 10:17:12 AM PST by
DrewsDad
(Choose Cruz - The Consistent Constitutional Conservative)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Yet they have no problem with Obama hiding everything about his past.
10 posted on
01/12/2016 10:17:15 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
12 posted on
01/12/2016 10:17:25 AM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Democrats will suddenly discover this argument, en masse, in September of this year, if Cruz is our nominee.
That much you can bet on.
14 posted on
01/12/2016 10:17:37 AM PST by
samtheman
(Elect Trump, Build Wall.)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
15 posted on
01/12/2016 10:17:40 AM PST by
TBBT
(uot)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
“He’s not a natural born citizen,” BUT
He “was naturalized at birth.”
He is just “not a natural born citizen” because of his politics.
How about how many of Hillary’s emails were born classified?
16 posted on
01/12/2016 10:18:01 AM PST by
Faith Presses On
("After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations...")
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Cruz isn't eligible.See tagline.
18 posted on
01/12/2016 10:18:38 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(Is Ted Cruz a US citizen? Yeah? Then Shut Up and Sit Down.)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
The mainstream media have no shame whatsoever. Double standards are just fine with them. It’s all about the cause, ethics be damned.
19 posted on
01/12/2016 10:18:50 AM PST by
Genoa
To: Behind the Blue Wall
20 posted on
01/12/2016 10:19:12 AM PST by
South40
(Ted Cruz = the only conservative in the race)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
So we are now referring to English interpretation of English law? What ever happened to the concept of a Republic governed by IT`S own laws and any domestic interpretations of them? Carried to furthest extent, you could then say international law and their interpretations now trumps American laws and our`s. That is at the heart of why we had a war of Independence, we`re free to make our own laws and interpretations of them..
21 posted on
01/12/2016 10:19:27 AM PST by
nomad
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Oh. So now all of a sudden they’re concerned about it? Obama sniffers.
22 posted on
01/12/2016 10:19:47 AM PST by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
23 posted on
01/12/2016 10:19:53 AM PST by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><> GO CRUZ!!!!)
To: Behind the Blue Wall
See? If Obama had been a Republican, he would have been destroyed over his eligibility. Cruz will be destroyed over his eligibility, because he’s not a Democrat and isn’t a dark skinned Hispanic.
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Wait, then how can Obama sit in office? His father certainly wasn’t a US citizen.
25 posted on
01/12/2016 10:20:19 AM PST by
Politicalkiddo
("If this poor life of mine could save you, [my country] how willingly would I make the sacrifice!")
To: Behind the Blue Wall
I have stayed out of the political food fight over political candidates.. Many reasons, and not pertinent to this subject. The powers that be will decide IF Cruz is eligible... and the political machines will either allow him on each states ballots or not. Thus far I am not impressed with the manner in which Cruz has allowed this big question to manifest. He had to have been paying attention to the Trump hunt of the current White House resident citizen status.
AND I cannot imagine that Cruz slept through Hillry’s birthing the birther movement of the current resident. The Constitution is to liberals whatever they say it is and means... and surely Cruz did not enter this race thinking the liberals were going to ignore such a plum opportunity to clip his wings.
28 posted on
01/12/2016 10:21:17 AM PST by
Just mythoughts
(Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson