Posted on 01/07/2016 9:23:53 AM PST by Kaslin
WASHINGTON -- Chicago has always struck me as one of the most affluent cities in the world. Growing up in Chicagoland, I saw little poverty in the city at the foot of glistening Lake Michigan. I am sure poverty was there, but Chicago in the 1960s seemed rich and abundant with opportunity. Alas, that was long ago. Chicago is still affluent at least on its north side and in the environs around Michigan Avenue, the city's Magnificent Mile. Yet, statistics tell us something different when we consider Chicago as a whole. Its poor neighborhoods are desperate.
Read the headlines from the city that two generations of Daleys governed effectively. Young males, usually blacks, are dying on the streets, often from run-ins with the police. For a certitude, they are acting recklessly, carrying weapons, often knives and guns, but the cops are acting aggressively. Just the other day a young man, agitated and carrying a baseball bat, was shot to death by a cop. Obviously, Chicago cops are dangerous. Moreover, city government seems to be covering up for them.
Chicago, certainly in its impoverished neighborhoods, is a city out of control. There is a rising call for Mayor Rahm Emanuel's scalp. In 2010, I returned to my hometown and took an interest in Emanuel's first race for mayor. I even threatened to run against the Godfather, as he is called, to liven things up. Frankly, I could not believe Rahm would really be interested in serving as the city's mayor. Chicago was already on the verge of ruin. If I were to run, it would be to run a heuristic exercise in politics similar to Bill Buckley's campaign for mayor of New York in 1965, hoping to educate the local pols on the value of non-governmental alternatives to their policies that had obviously become mired in government, bureaucrac and failure. Rahm and I could debate "the urban crisis" in terms very similar to the way "the urban crisis" of the 1960s was debated. Things really have not changed that much.
Crime, corruption and misgovernment were rampant. Last year, homicides in Chicago approached 470. Gang violence in some neighborhoods is a constant occurrence. The city has strict gun laws, but shootings in poor neighborhoods are a regular event. Public schools are in deplorable condition, with the teachers union promising a protracted strike later in the year, the second such strike during Rahm's five years in office. City finances are a dreadful mess, and the city's public school budget is out of balance by nearly $500 million. It hopes the state government can provide the money, but if the state legislature is not forthcoming, then 5,000 teachers are going to have to be laid off by Thanksgiving. The city's pensions are unfunded, and now comes Chicago's crisis with its police force. There are demonstrations almost around the clock, and an aide to the mayor was roughed up when he attended services for one of the cops' recent victims.
What is to be done? On the face of it, things look pretty hopeless. Chicago has been a big government town for years. Charter schools would supply one answer for the education chaos, but the city's education bureaucrats fudge the statistics so it is hard to say what is going on in the schools, and the corruption of its bureaucrats is almost equaled by the corruption of some of its charter systems. In October, Rahm's handpicked public schools chief, Barbara Byrd-Bennett, pleaded guilty to accepting $2.3 million in kickbacks (which is probably only the tip of the iceberg). Now under pressure from the Chicago Teachers Union, 42 of 50 aldermen are in favor of calling for a moratorium on charter school expansion. The good news is that there is substantial support among the citizens for expanding charter schools and choice in education in general. That is about all that can be said for Chicago.
Will the local activists get Emanuel's scalp? Well, Emanuel, why did you choose to run for mayor in the first place? Since you were elected and then reelected things have only gotten worse. You were recognized in the Obama White House, where you served as chief of staff, as a fixer. Chicago's problems defy a political fix. I have looked the city over and I have a solution. Why not relieve the pressure on the cops, the activists and the poor neighborhoods and quit? Go back to Wall Street. You made $18 million there in two years. Stay four and make $36 million. Get a house in the Hamptons. Continue your holidays in Cuba -- that is where you were when the most recent police crisis broke out. Actually Cuba is a very good place for a Chicago Democrat to get fresh ideas on how to govern Chicago. You cannot get more government solutions to urban problems than in Cuba.
Chicago is what happens when you pay people to feed, breed and vote.
May this venomous POS rot in hell.
Bump
Long term democrat rule + insane public unions + huge free sh*t army = misery, ruin and bankruptcy.
Shariah is what happens when you pay Muslims to feed, breed, and vote.
Hello Germany!
‘Young males, usually blacks, are dying on the streets, often from run-ins with the police.’
Really? I thought the police contributed little to the death toll vs other blacks.
My God. What a mess. Any Mayor would have a fight on his hands, cutting through the rainforests of corruption, apathy and balkanized districts. It’s like Detroit was 10 years ago, except with a protected upper class and four times the annual budget.
I grew up on the southwest side of Chicago in the 60s. It was no paradise with the riots, the creeping “’color line”, Black P Stone Rangers, and high racial tensions.
Not from run-ins, during run-ins with the police. Big difference.
“Read the headlines from the city that two generations of Daleys governed effectively. Young males, usually blacks, are dying on the streets, often from run-ins with the police.”
Often from police? How about often from each other?
The Daleys wanted to live in the city they governed; they had no higher aspirations and did not desire anything other than to maneuver the levers of government. That is why they were never found with tainted hands.
Rahm is an envious, greedy and ambitious climber.
His ultimate goal is much more grand than the 5th floor of City Hall.
The murder rate in Chicago is lower today than it was it the late 1960’s.
Liberal response: "Dog whistle! He means it was better when it was white!"
The truth: It was better before it was run by liberals.
Moving right along...
When Daley gave a seat at the table to the agitators like Bobby Rush and Danny Davis, things changed. Now these two are in Congress.
“Really? I thought the police contributed little to the death toll vs other blacks.”
When I wrote articles for the Tallahassee Democrat sometimes the editor would toss in what she felt was an explanatory sentence. These always bolstered her anti-business, ultra-liberal view and never made sense in the context of what I’d written. The sentence blaming cops for contributing to the problem is a sop to the generally accepted (by liberals) concept that the cops are at least as guilty as the blacks. If the sentence were not there the author would be deemed racist and BLM people would probably be all over him the next day. Call it BLM insurance.
Neither The Mayor nor his brother can do any wrong.
They are both brilliant, intellectual Progressive geniuses and are incapable of it.
See?
/s/
IMHO
Yes, I remember those creeping lines too. Halsted, then Ashland, then Damen, then Western. Now it is Pulaski, next stop?
“Obviously,Chicago cops are dangerous”,says the author.
In another paragraph he says-——”Why not relieve the pressure on the cops, the activists and the poor neighborhoods and quit?”
This guy can’t seem to make up his mind.
Anyone who wants to be a cop in that city is nuts. Let the people police themselves.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.