Any current polls indicating his local approval/disapproval?
If that fails, vote Ryan out of office in November. He's the worst of the worst. How many assurances did he give to conservatives that he would respect the conservative agenda?
It sure would be nice to know what motivates his treachery.
It is worth taking him out in the primary or in the general. When they pull this crap, they must know that they will be kicked to the curb. It should have been done long ago with Boehner, but oh, no, that seat in Ohio was SO important. BS. Summary career execution is necessary.
We threw out the sitting Majority Leader because he was a weasel about to betray us on amnesty.
Ryan deserves to be the next to be Cantorized.
Anybody but Ryan. That includes the Democrat and Communists. Better a commie than a sneaking treacherous weasel.
I hope the good people of Wisconsin find one.
The world isn't binary and he inherited a mess of monumental proportions just a few months ago. It would be refreshing to see an omnibus process that doesn't always hinge on crisis timing and bipartisan tantrums.
He is such a dolt the democrats were literally laughing at him and mocking him for being such a dolt, and probably found it hilarious that he came on afterwards trying to defend his betrayal
and Franlkin Graham should have not le3ft the party UNTIL it became clear the GOP weren’t going to do anything to punish Ryan for agreeing to what he did-
Boehner, Obama and Ryan got their revenge against those of us who pay taxes and are fed up with Washington’s BS.
Just tell me who to send the campaign contribution to, Lyin’ Ryan must go!!! Go take your place in the history book with Cantor you bastard!
Regardless that Speaker Ryan has heard his RINO colleagues read the Constitution out loud at the beginnings of the last three legislative sessions, he seems to have ”inadvertently overlooked” the following about his Omnibus spending bill. A previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from laying taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. This is evidenced by the excerpt below.
”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
In fact, based on the Courts statement above, here is a rough approximation of how much taxpayers should be paying Congress annually to perform its Section 8-limited power duties.
Given that the plurality of clauses in Section 8 deal with defense, and given that the Department of Defense budget for 2015 was $500+ billion, I will generously round up the $500+ billion figure to $1 trillion (but probably much less) as the annual price tag of the federal government to the taxpayers.
In other words, the corrupt media, including Obama guard dog Fx News, should not be reporting multi-trillion dollar annual federal budgets without mentioning the Supreme Courts clarification of Congresss limited power to appropriate taxes in budget discussions.
Remember in November!
When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its Section 8-limited powers to support the new president.
Also consider that such a Congress would probably be more willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
Paulie the Beard will get his buddy Zero to campaign for him.
Democrats probably promised him his seat and leadership through old age. He’s not worried because he has the democrats backing him.
HERE IS A FORMAT FR MEMBERS BELONGING TO A TEA PARTY GROUP COULD SUGGEST TO THEIR RESPECTIVE TP GROUP
IT USES THE QUESTIONAIRE CAMPAIGN TACTIC THAT BRINGS OUT THE ISSUES THE MEDIA WILL NOT TOUCH
WHICH TEA PARTIERS COULD SEND OUT DURING THEIR FUND RAISING EFFORTS TO DEFEAT THESE GUYS
We are tired of bills are not being read and billion$ and trillion$ of dollars in legislation called omnibus bills gettng passed. Fundings then get shoveled into agencies with the results being government intrusion as well as its employees that grow into our lives regulating US how we; eat, sleep, pray, get married , and think
Should your Senator or congressman have voted NO on any such 1000 page or more Omnibus funding bills of extended duration beyond 60 days if congress did not do its job and consider (read) what it is passing? (Yes) or (NO) ?
If they voted no and the socialists and the MSM will scream government shutdown.
Would you still support them? (Y) (N) (Maybe). Should Obama care be (fixed) or (dumped) And if either votes to fix and not dump it will you support them for another term (YES) or (NO)
Should your group make this an issue in this campaign.YES NO
IRS EPA. INS..These agencys are out of control INS....
The people who head these agencies get approved by the senate and swear an oath to support the constitution not the executive branch or the president.
Should your congress member support hearings Investigating their funding and operation (Y)(N)
If such officers are found guilty of abusing or exceeding their legislative authorization .
Should they support their encircle which ( censure) (impeachment) (defunding)...If they refuses to do so will you still support them in 2016 ? YES NO
EPA Own waterfront property? You cant clear your waterfront jungle. Federalized property collecting water during a rainstorm and Pay more for the b/s in your gas & idiot lites in your car. Watch what you flush because higher electric bills will save the world and the bankrupt campaign contributers in the solar industry. Ordered modifications on gasoline and diesel engines which greatly increased their cost with regulations that yielded questionable results.
It is time to reign in EPA Funding? (Y)(N)
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We do not allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check. Which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .
Yet we are letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .
.
Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. Should that apply to convicted felons ? (Y) (N) Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ?
Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting the regimes open borders policy including sanctuary cities be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) .
Should the senate have rejected any such candidate to be Attorney General by voting if needed setting aside the 60 vote majority and applying the simple majority Reid rule citing the Hanen court injunction ruling that would restrict the use of the Reid rule to use only when such a ruling by the court is made ? (Yes) (No)
In countries such as Mexico which claims areas of the United States. Where an American citizen decides to be a legal retiree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out .Let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .
Should we deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges we are presently offering illegals to any citizen of the United States living in that country. Yes No
Would you continue to support a Congress member who refuses to support such reciprocal restrictions ? And by doing so believes the United States should support open border one world socialism ? (Y) (N)
Would that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)
Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason Y N
Throw the bearded SOB out GOP, or hasten your highly probable demise.
We have had it.
Time for Ryan to either get rid of the beard or admit the truth
If Wisconsin patriots are ready to put forth a credible candidate, the rest of the country’s patriots stand ready to support a sturdy primary against Ryan. We will put our money where our mouth is, and I will be first in line.
Yes, he could be Cantorized.